Official~Best offsets for running FAT tires!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2013 | 01:44 AM
  #616  
Tim30250's Avatar
Tim30250
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 18
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Drive Clean
Anyone know what will give me a nice flush fitment with a 19x10 on the rear? Im also looking to run at least a 285/35/19 tire. Thanks !
I was researching the same thing. The answer to this question is in post #176 on page 12 of this thread. BLNEWT got a great flush fit with a 20x10 +45 and was able to run a 295/30 without lots of negative camber. If you were going 19" you'd probably want to use a 295/35.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2013 | 02:38 AM
  #617  
Drive Clean's Avatar
Drive Clean
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 110
Likes: 57
Originally Posted by Tim30250
I was researching the same thing. The answer to this question is in post #176 on page 12 of this thread. BLNEWT got a great flush fit with a 20x10 +45 and was able to run a 295/30 without lots of negative camber. If you were going 19" you'd probably want to use a 295/35.
Thanks! for some reason i thought he was running 10.5 in the back. My bad!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2013 | 11:14 AM
  #618  
Tim30250's Avatar
Tim30250
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 18
From: San Antonio, TX
Easy assumption to make.. It seems many more people are running 10.5 in the rear than 10. I am in the process of selecting some upgraded wheels and tires myself. It appears that with the 10" wheel you can run a 295 tire with a +45 offset. As BLNEWT measured, that will give you 2mm clearance to the fender. Unfortunately, a 10.5 wheel with the same offset and tire would stick out about 4mm and require a good deal of neg camber. I've had a hard time finding a 10" +45 rear wheel that fits my taste and my budget, so its looking like I may also go with a 10.5 wheel and use a 285mm tire to be safe.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2013 | 12:19 PM
  #619  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,876
Likes: 4,949
If you go 10.5 w/ the same fit as mine you'd want a +50 offset, but if you look at dagon68s Sedan he's running 295s on a 10.5 +45 and sneaks them in, not sure what camber he's running, might want to shoot him a PM for more specifics.
https://www.myg37.com/forums/brakes-...-my-sedan.html
Keep in mind the originator of this fine thread "Robert K" is running a 10.5 +45 19" w/ 285s and the fit is spot-on w/ in-spec camber.
https://www.myg37.com/forums/g37-sed...read-g37s.html
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2013 | 12:45 PM
  #620  
Tim30250's Avatar
Tim30250
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 18
From: San Antonio, TX
Another variable that really isn't talked about much is the width of the tires themselves and how they can fluctuate (at the same stated size) from brand to brand. In my research, I've seen 285 width tires measuring between 11.0" and 11.4" as per manufacturer specs. That equates up to +/- 5mm of width fluctuation on both the suspension and the fender side. That variance can certainly make or break a fitment, ride height and camber adjustments not withstanding.

What's most amazing about your setup, BLNEWT, is that your 295 tires have an advertised width of 11.9" and they certainly only fit because you found the perfect wheel size and offset for them. I would simply emulate your setup since I would love to run the 295, but I'm having trouble finding 20x10" +45 or 20x10.5 +50 wheels to choose from.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2013 | 01:18 PM
  #621  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,876
Likes: 4,949
Originally Posted by Tim30250
Another variable that really isn't talked about much is the width of the tires themselves and how they can fluctuate (at the same stated size) from brand to brand. In my research, I've seen 285 width tires measuring between 11.0" and 11.4" as per manufacturer specs. That equates up to +/- 5mm of width fluctuation on both the suspension and the fender side. That variance can certainly make or break a fitment, ride height and camber adjustments not withstanding.

What's most amazing about your setup, BLNEWT, is that your 295 tires have an advertised width of 11.9" and they certainly only fit because you found the perfect wheel size and offset for them. I would simply emulate your setup since I would love to run the 295, but I'm having trouble finding 20x10" +45 or 20x10.5 +50 wheels to choose from.
Good luck Tim, the wheel search is something I found to be a bit of a chore but The guys over at GOTO racing (member 1cleanG) really helped dial in my offsets. The wheels I bought were blanks and even though I got a standard offset cut they were available to cut almost any reasonable offset from almost zero to +60. Maybe you can get lucky and find a wheel you like w/ the proper offset or contact the vendor to see if you can get a custom cut. Just keep in mind if you happen to have an S or plan on upgrading to big calipers down the road that will play a big part in your wheel selection.
Have fun w/ your search & good luck BTW if there's a particular style you're after I've done a fair amount of wheel searching so I may be able to give you some further choices.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2013 | 11:15 AM
  #622  
dagon68's Avatar
dagon68
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
Hey all yes I am running a 10.5 with 295 with no issues. I am dropped on swift springs. I tell everyone to shave the bumper bracket in the rear and shave the plastic hump on the front fender liner (just behind the headlights) but to honest I have done neither. I have rubbed in these areas on occasion but nothing bad enough to cause me to trim this stuff. I was on stock alignment for over a year until recently I took it to a shop and they just adjusted the rear by changing a bolt to give them more play to adjust. I don't know what the alignment specs are or I would post them. Here is a picture of the wheel compressed on a hill. As you can see it cambers in just fine with know issues. anyway if anyone has any questions or needs more pictures just PM me or post here I will be more than happy to help :P





Last edited by dagon68; Nov 25, 2013 at 01:39 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2013 | 08:24 PM
  #623  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 126
From: Houston, Tx
I'm running a 285/35-19x10.5 +45 and plan on going to a 295/30.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2013 | 07:29 AM
  #624  
Tim30250's Avatar
Tim30250
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 18
From: San Antonio, TX
One aspect of the "fat tire" upgrade I haven't seen commented on too often is traction.

How has off-the-line traction and the overall performance dynamics of the car changed when everyone went to their wide tire setup?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2013 | 09:40 AM
  #625  
dagon68's Avatar
dagon68
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by Tim30250
One aspect of the "fat tire" upgrade I haven't seen commented on too often is traction.

How has off-the-line traction and the overall performance dynamics of the car changed when everyone went to their wide tire setup?
I can still spin my rears easily but if I take off right I get a nice jump out of the hole Definitely better traction. Handling is also much better. I put my wheels on before I had the springs and I could tell a difference in traction and control but once I lowered it, it felt more "on rails". The alignment added some tightness to it all. I feel no power loss with regards to "rotational mass" from the weight/size of the tires and rims. I would say in fact the opposite has happened. I feel more power and handling getting to the pavement
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2013 | 10:54 AM
  #626  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 126
From: Houston, Tx
Traction is relative to the tires. With that said more tire patch increases traction. However increase tire patch also leads to increase hydroplaning. Why one must buy a great tire.

Also make note that with larger wheels/tires you can have increased rotational mass which takes more torque/power to turn. This is why I'm a big advocate for a top-of-the-line wheels/tires that has a low rotational mass.

There is always a negative with a positive when modding/building cars. Cheap, Fast, Reliable; Pick two.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2013 | 01:45 PM
  #627  
dagon68's Avatar
dagon68
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by Robert_K
increase tire patch also leads to increase hydroplaning.
Yes I have noticed this. My skid control (or whatever its called) saved me.

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Also make note that with larger wheels/tires you can have increased rotational mass which takes more torque/power to turn. This is why I'm a big advocate for a top-of-the-line wheels/tires that has a low rotational mass.
Oh so true. I was very concerned with the weight of Vossens when I was looking into what to buy but in the end I ended up going with them. Mainly because of my budget but if I had the extra dough I would have gone with a light weight wheel over these any day.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 02:06 AM
  #628  
Infiniti_Isaac's Avatar
Infiniti_Isaac
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Fat Tire Full Square Setup for Sedan

First off, love this thread! Just read all 42 pages tonight. (Yeah, my eyes are a little blurry.)

So here's my question:

I have an '07 G35x Sedan on stock springs for now but going to Eibach Pro-Kit soon for mild drop. I autocross my car and want the largest rubber I can get on there (especially in the front) and stay full square.

There's a set of 19x9.5 +42 Enkei RPF1 wheels with 275/35/19 tires on them on craigslist right now. I really want them but I'm a little worried about the fronts hitting my fender lip. I didn't see this exact size discussed for the front of sedan so thought I'd ask. Any input greatly appreciated!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 08:58 AM
  #629  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,876
Likes: 4,949
Originally Posted by Infiniti_Isaac
First off, love this thread! Just read all 42 pages tonight. (Yeah, my eyes are a little blurry.)

So here's my question:

I have an '07 G35x Sedan on stock springs for now but going to Eibach Pro-Kit soon for mild drop. I autocross my car and want the largest rubber I can get on there (especially in the front) and stay full square.

There's a set of 19x9.5 +42 Enkei RPF1 wheels with 275/35/19 tires on them on craigslist right now. I really want them but I'm a little worried about the fronts hitting my fender lip. I didn't see this exact size discussed for the front of sedan so thought I'd ask. Any input greatly appreciated!
I'd use the tire calculator and plug in your old specs and then post the new specs, use the new reading w/ a strait edge out on your car to see exactly the amount of extension in the wheel well. I'm thinking 275s in front is a bit much, probably be about 5mm outside the fender once you drop it. Like you noticed you don't see the wider tires up front, the fender isn't rolled like the rear so it's not as easy to fit. You could just get new front 245/40/19s but they'd be stretched a bit on a 9.5.
https://www.myg37.com/forums/tire_rim_calculator.php
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 12:33 AM
  #630  
Infiniti_Isaac's Avatar
Infiniti_Isaac
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by blnewt
I'd use the tire calculator and plug in your old specs and then post the new specs, use the new reading w/ a strait edge out on your car to see exactly the amount of extension in the wheel well. I'm thinking 275s in front is a bit much, probably be about 5mm outside the fender once you drop it. Like you noticed you don't see the wider tires up front, the fender isn't rolled like the rear so it's not as easy to fit. You could just get new front 245/40/19s but they'd be stretched a bit on a 9.5.
https://www.myg37.com/forums/tire_rim_calculator.php
Thanks blnewt. You hit the nail on the head. I did end up buying the wheels and tires because I really wanted RPF1's and they were a great deal. The fronts stick out about 5mm. Since I'm not lowered I'm okay but I'd probably need to go with a 245/40/19 in front if I lower it. I actually really like the even fender gap in the back and wish I could just lower the front about one inch to even it out. I'm AWD so I don't want this thing slammed and scraping in the snow.

If someone wants to run 275/35 in the front of a dropped sedan looks like they could do it with 19x9.5+45 and rolling the inner fender lip. I'll post some pics of my setup later this week.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.