G37 Sedan

Q50 Eau Rouge

Old Feb 25, 2014 | 12:59 PM
  #181  
Chris11LE's Avatar
Chris11LE
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 810
Likes: 23
Originally Posted by blackfunk
But you lose the warranty, the nicely done interior, the resale value and most importantly you'll never have the badge - it really does count for something.
True. Resale value to me isnt a huge deal, as I keep my vehicles for long periods of time.

On the flip side, "long periods of time" and German cars *still* dont seem to get along well with each other. I know Mercedes is making great strides, but lets see how the new C class is holding up years from now, after the warranty has expired.

As far as the interior goes.....well, the nav screen on the upcoming C class makes it look hideous. Oddly enough, I noticed in the new Mazda 3 commercials, they have the same "tacked on" look to their nav screen. Maybe its the future, maybe they cheaped out, I dont know. I DO know Im not a fan.

And comparing the CL-A to the Q50 is NOT apples to apples. AFAIK the CL-A is a true compact car. Like Acura ILX/Honda Civic size. Obviously the Q50 is not. So pricing comparisons are thrown out the door since its not a fair comparison.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 08:03 AM
  #182  
soundmike's Avatar
soundmike
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 36
Infiniti Q50 Eau Rouge gets the heart of a GT-R

Infiniti Q50 Eau Rouge gets the heart of a GT-R

The latest evolution of the Eau Rouge packs the same 3.8-liter, twin turbocharged V6 found in the GT-R but with a unique tune of 560 horsepower and 443 pound-feet (600 Newton-meters) of torque. That makes it 15 hp more powerful than the standard 2015 GT-R but gives up 20 lb-ft of torque. Power gets to the ground through the GT-R's all-wheel-drive system. Infiniti predicts that the Eau Rouge would sprint to 60 miles per hour in less than 4 seconds and on to a top speed of 180 mph.

According to Infiniti Communications Senior Manager Kyle Bazemore in an email to Autoblog, the modded GT-R powertrain was not the only choice for the Eau Rouge. It also considered "developing a high-power sports diesel" and hybrid versions with an electric supercharger. However, "this was the clear solution for this concept car," Bazemore said. Other than the drivetrain, the Eau Rouge in Switzerland is identical to the one shown in Detroit. Sadly, it is not confirmed for production; so we might not be getting the fabled Infiniti GT-R sedan any time soon. Still, we can hope.

In addition to the Eau Rouge, Infiniti is also adding a new entry-level Q50 that is launching first in Europe and China. It is powered by a 2.0-liter, turbocharged, petrol four-cylinder with 211 hp and 236 lb-ft (320 Nm) of torque and a seven-speed automatic. There is a chance the powerplant could also arrive in US models later as a less expensive, more economical option to the car's standard V6. Scroll down to read the full press release on both models and listen to the Eau Rouge start up.

Infiniti Q50 Eau Rouge gets the heart of a GT-R [w/video] - Autoblog
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 08:23 AM
  #183  
Black Betty's Avatar
Black Betty
Thread Starter
Lexus Defector
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 21,148
Likes: 2,093
Well it looks like a lot of people were wrong about this concept, including me. Great job Infiniti. If it were to make it to production with that power train it would most certainly price it out of my range. But kudos for going ***** to the wall on the concept. Now if it could just make it to the production line with most of the good stuff kept intact and a different (less expensive) power plant I'll be in line.

I think the 2.0 l turbo 4 might be a popular option because of tuning potential. I hope it makes it here as a less expensive and powerful option that would help sell more cars.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 09:28 AM
  #184  
NeverBoneStock's Avatar
NeverBoneStock
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 69
From: Vancouver, WA
Blah !! I would rather have a Q sedan and put one of those GTM turbo kits in it that Betty is never going to get ... Save some money ya know ....
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 09:51 AM
  #185  
Black Betty's Avatar
Black Betty
Thread Starter
Lexus Defector
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 21,148
Likes: 2,093
Originally Posted by NeverBoneStock
Blah !! I would rather have a Q sedan and put one of those GTM turbo kits in it that Betty is never going to get ... Save some money ya know ....
Or you could save even more money and get an old Civic and build the hell out of that motor and have an even faster car. Sure you'd be driving a Civic, and not a luxury sedan. But it would be hella fast and you'd save a ton of money!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 11:18 AM
  #186  
crazjayz's Avatar
crazjayz
Registered Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 499
Likes: 18
From: Los Angeles
I told you so? Hahaha. I'm just worried that the price is going to be even higher than what I predicted before... When stating +500hp +600tq, I didn't think the torque figure would be in Nm though. That's kind of disappointing.

Originally Posted by crazjayz
Then buy a GTR, the Q50ER wouldn't be for you. Just like you wouldn't cross-shop a Range Rover Autobiography with a C63 Black Series... but they're the same price. But if you're looking for a 4-door supercar, your options are the likes of the E63, M5, Panamera, and here's the breakdown
  • M5 - $92,500
  • E63 - $92,770
  • Panamera S - $93,200
  • Q50 Eau Rouge - starting around $75,500, fully loaded at $90,000*
*This price comes from the 19% premium between a base Q50S AWD and a fully loaded Q50S AWD. If they made the car start closer to $70,000, a fully loaded car would be $83,300. More likely though they're going to make a bunch of stuff standard, and probably only keep the "tech" stuff optional (radar guided stuff). Thus, the base will probably be closer to $85,000.

At $90k fully loaded Q50ER would actually be a bargain. A well equipped M5 is around $105k, and the same goes for the E63. The Porsche, we all know, is in a different league with it comes to pricing. Moderately equipped you're looking closer to $110k. Now, if you think I'm really insane, possibly because I'm comparing it to the wrong car class (I should be looking at the C63, M3, ISF), check this out.

If the Q50ER really does have a 550hp engine, which would pretty much mean something exactly like the GTR. Why? Because they all nearly weigh the same.

GTR - 3829lbs
Q50S AWD - 3849lbs
Q50S hybrid AWD - 4145lbs

If they just did a drivetrain swap, the weights wouldn't change all that much (I would actually think they would go down). So pretty much, you're talking GTR performance for $90k. The C63, M3, ISF crowd is no comparison to a GTR; heck, even E63/M5 can't hang with a GTR. So sure, it's a bit more expensive than these cars, but it's also delivering something significantly above them too.

The GTR is the "bargain" supercar because it can keep up with the likes of Porsche and Ferrari at half the price. The Q50ER may be the bargain supersedan if it can keep up with something like a Panamera Turbo at half the price.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 11:31 AM
  #187  
alfredo24pr's Avatar
alfredo24pr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 796
Likes: 95
From: Puerto Rico
I doubt Infiniti will release this model at a price less than the GTR or close.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 11:36 AM
  #188  
Diego@Vossen's Avatar
Diego@Vossen
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 271
From: Miami, FL
Amazing Infiniti!!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 12:06 PM
  #189  
VQHRLover's Avatar
VQHRLover
Registered Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 7
From: Vancouver BC
Any word on what transmission they will be using for the Q50ER? Hope its not the garbage 7 speed we have to deal with...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 12:20 PM
  #190  
alfredo24pr's Avatar
alfredo24pr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 796
Likes: 95
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by VQHRLover
Any word on what transmission they will be using for the Q50ER? Hope its not the garbage 7 speed we have to deal with...
Obviously not. Probably GTR trans, brakes, etc...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 12:22 PM
  #191  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,173
Likes: 244
From: Doha, Qatar
My money's on a beefed up 7AT. The GTR tranny is far from being luxurious, sounds like small animals are being grinded down in it even while idling lol
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 12:35 PM
  #192  
Black Betty's Avatar
Black Betty
Thread Starter
Lexus Defector
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 21,148
Likes: 2,093
Originally Posted by crazjayz
I told you so? Hahaha. I'm just worried that the price is going to be even higher than what I predicted before... When stating +500hp +600tq, I didn't think the torque figure would be in Nm though. That's kind of disappointing.
You called it. However, keep in mind that this is still the concept, not a production model. Remember the JDN said that the car will not share the exact same engine as the GTR but that it will be produced in the same plant. Maybe GTR power plant for the concept, but different engine in the production version?

And yes, it looks like they aren't playing around so the sticker shock will probably be pretty intense. Now that the car is truly as badass as people seem to be clamoring for, cue the complaints that it's priced way too high. For people who dont like it, there will always be plenty of things to complain about that it doesn't have or that it does have. Even cars that are near perfect in most gearheads' minds all have a vocal group of haters. Like most of the Infiniti haters I read comments from on places like Jalopnik are guys who are driving used $25K cars and picking apart cars that cost 2 or 3 times as much and saying why they wouldn't buy them. As if a manufacturer would build a car based on the opinion of people that never could or would buy them.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 01:40 PM
  #193  
PongSanity's Avatar
PongSanity
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 996
Likes: 129
From: St. Thomas Virgin Islands
kudos to infiniti for an amazing concept... lets hope the production car is as close to it...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 02:05 PM
  #194  
hinomura's Avatar
hinomura
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 249
Likes: 10
Probably the only Q I would trade my G for, hell I can even keep my ridiculously punny vanity plate theme. RG37S --> Q50ERG3. If they do release it *gulp* I'll eat ramen for a year if I have to, in order to afford this behemoth.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 02:19 PM
  #195  
crazjayz's Avatar
crazjayz
Registered Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 499
Likes: 18
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Black Betty
You called it. However, keep in mind that this is still the concept, not a production model. Remember the JDN said that the car will not share the exact same engine as the GTR but that it will be produced in the same plant. Maybe GTR power plant for the concept, but different engine in the production version?

And yes, it looks like they aren't playing around so the sticker shock will probably be pretty intense. Now that the car is truly as badass as people seem to be clamoring for, cue the complaints that it's priced way too high. For people who dont like it, there will always be plenty of things to complain about that it doesn't have or that it does have. Even cars that are near perfect in most gearheads' minds all have a vocal group of haters. Like most of the Infiniti haters I read comments from on places like Jalopnik are guys who are driving used $25K cars and picking apart cars that cost 2 or 3 times as much and saying why they wouldn't buy them. As if a manufacturer would build a car based on the opinion of people that never could or would buy them.
Haha, yeah, I completely agree with what you're saying. With regards to sticker shock, I think we may have an FX Vettle edition on our hands again. I also believe you're right about the powerplant. I posted an article a couple pages back that said that Infiniti would be developing a new twin-turbo powerplant, and moreover, everything else stated in that article came to fruition.

Originally Posted by hinomura
Probably the only Q I would trade my G for, hell I can even keep my ridiculously punny vanity plate theme. RG37S --> Q50ERG3. If they do release it *gulp* I'll eat ramen for a year if I have to, in order to afford this behemoth.
You mean 5 years right? Normal meal = $15 at 3x a day = $45 a day. Ramen is $3 a day. Net is $42 saved a day, or $15,330 for a year. You'll need 5 years to break $75k. .....
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.