Thats ok Lek,...John still hasnt evened up the score in Tiger Woods Golf.

Just like you Lek...I too was nice guy and let him win a few...LOL

 

ohhhh man. Let's talk about the many days I whooped that azz in Tiger. Times even you'd be playing someone else online and ask me to putt for you cus you didnt have the skills

Your Tiger skills are weak my inferior friend

 

lol, how can you "KEEP" whooping me when you only beat me once??

I thought you asians knew math

 

john says i cant count. i think he's just repressed the multiple losses in his mind looool

 

graphics look terrible. the G looks cartoony and too sharp...GT4 FTW

 

I was messing with some of the photo editors to try out different effects. And also it seems like when their uploaded to Forzamotorsport.net it removes the anti-aliasing. They look better on my TV then they do online.

That being said, yes, GTHD demo does look better in some respects but I really don't care about the nominal difference in graphics when Forza has so many more things that GT has yet to put into their game.

 

I agree with U, Gran Turismo is the best driving sim {IMO} U should see the details on how they design the game and every little thing they put together...the game designers also go to the track and test the cars to mimic how the car should perform in the game
http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/driving/...3E2wjP55bgEszc

 

I agree, the Graphics were definately a disappointment for me, however the gameplay is good.

 

The Forza team did the same thing. They put so much work into getting the physics right, they did the graphics last.They even said the graphics were the last thing they were working on. They mic'd the cars, the measured the tracks, this is a tit-for-tat thing. If you're a graphics *****, that's all well and good, be a graphics *****, nothing wrong with it. I just never understood how GT was proclaimed to be such a great simulator when you can bumper car around the corner and not loose speed or take damage?

GT= Better graphics, more cars than Forza
FM= Better physics, damage modeling, strong online components

 

I say F*CK all the simulators lol

 

LOL, don't get me wrong, I like NFS and Midnight Club too. I just like racing games in general.

 

Shhh Sony fanboy!!!!!!

 

^+1 LOL..... I was thinking the same thing. I've played both and like both, they just have different strengths.

 

If they ever did crash zone testing on the real cars, I would have to turn my head from that. too painful to watch

That was one thing that bugged me about the GT series. I have the demo on the PS3 though and I have to admit it is amazing. I let the 360 dl forza 2 last night (Demo) I will check that out later on tonight.

 

Fanboy or not I know the history. Polyphony was making racing games when microsoft was still discovering security holes in windows 98!!

There are many cars available in japan that are not here stateside IE Tommy Kaira (SP?). I only play GT for the euro and asian cars, not for US muscle. In addition, if anybody truly knew the reason cars in GT do NOT take damage is b/c the actual car manufacturers would ONLY provide a license to their cars/designs etc IF and ONLY IF the cars show NO signs of damage. I can post many links regarding this...and again this was something that started after GT1, waaaay before xbox was even on store shelves. The car manufacturers MAY since then have changed their rulings, but this was the main reason that the cars in GT never showed any damage. It wasnt a lack of development, it was a licensing restriction placed on polyphony/sony...