Audio, Video & Electronics Post questions, reviews, and other general info about the G's Nav, sound system, satellite radio or aftermarket stereos

New Navigation Looks Like It Still SUCKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 02:52 AM
  #1  
civic4982's Avatar
civic4982
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
New Navigation Looks Like It Still SUCKS

The new navigation looks like the interface still sucks crap.

Where's the touch screen that Acura/Honda have been doing for 3 or 4 years now?

Are they going to be doing voice activation for the navi?

A huge improvement I noticed is that they combined all the in cabin info onto the screen like they did on the murano and the FX/QX/and others (it's about f'in time). They've also got a much better input device than that piece of $hit miniature joystick that only a 5 year old child could have small enough hands to use.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 04:30 AM
  #2  
Hypnoz's Avatar
Hypnoz
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
The 07 G sedan and G37 have the same navigation, which is touch screen or you can use the wheel/buttons.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 07:00 AM
  #3  
muscarel's Avatar
muscarel
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by civic4982
The new navigation looks like the interface still sucks crap.

Where's the touch screen that Acura/Honda have been doing for 3 or 4 years now?

Are they going to be doing voice activation for the navi?

A huge improvement I noticed is that they combined all the in cabin info onto the screen like they did on the murano and the FX/QX/and others (it's about f'in time). They've also got a much better input device than that piece of $hit miniature joystick that only a 5 year old child could have small enough hands to use.
Yes, the Navigation system in the new G37 looks identical to that in the 2007 sedan. It is a very good unit - and much better than the 1st gen unit. With the new system you have 3 choices (choices are good) - touchscreen, the round **** and buttons, or voice activated. It also contains your radio, music box, etc information. It is also hard drive based, making it much faster than the previous DVD unit.

It is one of my favorite features of the new gen cars.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 07:50 AM
  #4  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Garnet Canuck
Traveling Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 3
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
The Navi in the 2nd gen is absolutely amazing. The graphics are incredible, it's lightning fast, and like others have mentioned, it does in fact have touch screen and can be voice activated.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #5  
mantisG35's Avatar
mantisG35
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: OC
Originally Posted by civic4982
The new navigation looks like the interface still sucks crap.

Where's the touch screen that Acura/Honda have been doing for 3 or 4 years now?

Are they going to be doing voice activation for the navi?

A huge improvement I noticed is that they combined all the in cabin info onto the screen like they did on the murano and the FX/QX/and others (it's about f'in time). They've also got a much better input device than that piece of $hit miniature joystick that only a 5 year old child could have small enough hands to use.
huh? it is touch-screen. PLUS drive a BMW with iDrive and that should make you feel VERY good about infiniti's navi
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #6  
ElixXxeR's Avatar
ElixXxeR
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Yea, to the OP, you need to experience the nav. It is the best in the industry for the class of car as of now, truly amazing. And the old one did not suck.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 02:37 PM
  #7  
anotha's Avatar
anotha
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
I wasnt aware people did not like the 1st gen nav, what exactly did you all not like?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #8  
muscarel's Avatar
muscarel
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
I didn't say the 1st gen was no good, but re-reading my email, perhaps I may have implied that.

The 1st gen was very good for its time.

When Infiniti was using DVD, BMW was still using CD. Now they are using hard drives, and BMW is using DVD. They're a generation behind.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #9  
bostonmerlin's Avatar
bostonmerlin
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Boston
1st gen was good (2003).. loved 3d view. what i wanted vs what i got was touch screen. back then the lexus nav was the one to beat if i recall. you could argue fingerprints but overall touch is faster for me to use. i cant wait to use gen 2. traffic, touch, faster, nicer screen/graphics, more car functions integrated. Hell, i even liked my sexy-momma-voice chick! The gen2 should be fun to use. This is where 2007 sedan owners should speak up as they've been using the soon-2-be g37 system for a while now.
bm
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 09:21 AM
  #10  
civic4982's Avatar
civic4982
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
acura/honda navi is light years ahead even the newest one on the g37 coupe.

my mistake on it being touch screen though.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #11  
civic4982's Avatar
civic4982
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mantisG35
huh? it is touch-screen. PLUS drive a BMW with iDrive and that should make you feel VERY good about infiniti's navi
why compare it to something that sucks? you go drive an Acura TL or RL and that should amke you feel VERY bad about Infiniti's navi.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 09:59 AM
  #12  
G35_TX's Avatar
G35_TX
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
I agree. Honda has the Navi systems down good.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #13  
mantisG35's Avatar
mantisG35
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: OC
Originally Posted by civic4982
why compare it to something that sucks? you go drive an Acura TL or RL and that should amke you feel VERY bad about Infiniti's navi.
because i havent seen them?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #14  
CHI-TOWN G37's Avatar
CHI-TOWN G37
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by civic4982
acura/honda navi is light years ahead even the newest one on the g37 coupe.

my mistake on it being touch screen though.
It's also voice activated, which you missed as well. I've had Honda/Acura Mercedes and have played with my Bro's BMW NAVI. BMW is the worst, followed closely by MB with Honda/Acura light years ahead of them. As long as this new Infiniti system is DVD based and has touch/voice it should be all good as that is about as good as it gets today. XM real-time traffic is also available which once again is about as advanced as you could expect.

Not sure what is so suck-crap about that
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #15  
ICHANCE's Avatar
ICHANCE
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Jackson,MS
Originally Posted by civic4982
acura/honda navi is light years ahead even the newest one on the g37 coupe.

my mistake on it being touch screen though.
Hey guys you gotta remember where he's coming from.............................................. ................Civic. The world of the wrong wheel drives.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.