G37 Coupe

Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 08:14 PM
  #3226  
tomro99's Avatar
tomro99
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 680
Likes: 10
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by eljoker
3.5? **** that's Lambo/911/Ferrari territory. That hard to believe on a 50k sedan built for the masses. Not even the M3s and C63s do that.
Was just about to say that. M4 does it in 3.7.
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 09:46 PM
  #3227  
sdwilly's Avatar
sdwilly
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by eljoker
3.5? **** that's Lambo/911/Ferrari territory. That hard to believe on a 50k sedan built for the masses. Not even the M3s and C63s do that.
That would also be faster than the lighter weight, more HP 911 Carrera S, which does it in 3.7 (W/ PDK & Sport Chrono)

The Lexus RC-F which has quite a bit more HP but comes in around 100lbs heavier does 0 - 60 around 4.4 seconds.

Last edited by sdwilly; Sep 16, 2016 at 12:05 AM.
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 09:51 PM
  #3228  
ThebigJ's Avatar
ThebigJ
Registered Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 243
Likes: 17
I don't buy that.

Although below 4.0 is no longer a big deal since Camaro 2ss can do it in 3.9, corvette 3.7, given the weight, power, lack of lsd there is no way a RS sedan doing it below 4.0 let alone 3.5 sorry. 4.3-4.4 should be possible though.

Whether :

1) He is spinning so speedometer is inaccurate.
2) He is going downhill

or maybe he has some mods other than just tires.
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 10:20 PM
  #3229  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
KAHBOOM
Super Moderator of Pwnage
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 195
From: NC
I don't know about 3.5 but I've always said, about my test drive, it felt like I was losing 1/2 second to 60 just because of losing grip on the RS400
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 02:12 AM
  #3230  
gill1606's Avatar
gill1606
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 601
Likes: 99
From: skyline boulevard
if you watch the video he starts acclerating at 4 seconds into the video and hits 60 by 7 seconds into the video. he went from 0-60 between 0:04-0:07 in video, which is a good 3 seconds at least. It could have been 3.25 sec, 3.50sec, or 3.75sec, but he was at 60 by 7 seconds from 4 seconds definitely.

Although the reviewers are expecting 4.5 seconds 0-60 time. No one has actually attempted one except the guy in that video.

EDIT: the pause at 70mph i think was due to wheel spin and not letting off the throttle.

Last edited by gill1606; Sep 16, 2016 at 02:28 AM.
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 02:34 AM
  #3231  
sdwilly's Avatar
sdwilly
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by gill1606
Although the reviewers are expecting 4.5 seconds 0-60 time. No one has actually attempted one except the guy in that video.
Car and Driver did.

2016 Infiniti Q50S 3.0T Red Sport 400 Test ? Review ? Car and Driver

Zero to 60 mph: 4.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.5 sec
Zero to 140 mph: 22.6 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.0 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 3.2 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 13.0 sec @ 112 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 153 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.88 g
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 02:39 AM
  #3232  
User 122320's Avatar
User 122320
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 907
Likes: 75
Originally Posted by gill1606
if you watch the video he starts acclerating at 4 seconds into the video and hits 60 by 7 seconds into the video. he went from 0-60 between 0:04-0:07 in video, which is a good 3 seconds at least. It could have been 3.25 sec, 3.50sec, or 3.75sec, but he was at 60 by 7 seconds from 4 seconds definitely.

Although the reviewers are expecting 4.5 seconds 0-60 time. No one has actually attempted one except the guy in that video.

EDIT: the pause at 70mph i think was due to wheel spin and not letting off the throttle.
That's hella flawed. It takes a lot longer to move from a dead stop than it does while a 3k pound car is already in motion. I would take 1 second away at least from that.
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 02:40 AM
  #3233  
gill1606's Avatar
gill1606
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 601
Likes: 99
From: skyline boulevard
Looks beautiful dude, JUST beautiful.

Old Sep 16, 2016 | 02:45 AM
  #3234  
gill1606's Avatar
gill1606
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 601
Likes: 99
From: skyline boulevard
Originally Posted by sdwilly
Car and Driver did.

2016 Infiniti Q50S 3.0T Red Sport 400 Test ? Review ? Car and Driver

Zero to 60 mph: 4.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.5 sec
Zero to 140 mph: 22.6 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.0 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 3.2 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 13.0 sec @ 112 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 153 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.88 g
Yeah but what tires were on the Red Sport when it was done? if it were the stock run flats, it would affect the 0-60 time. The dude in the video had his tires switched out to ones that better handle the horse power.
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 02:49 AM
  #3235  
sdwilly's Avatar
sdwilly
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
He isn't adding a full second that way.

Look the Porsche 911 Carrera S. Is 600lbs lighter, more HP, more torque, great stock tires, and a way superior transmission (PDK), does 0 - 60 in the 3.5 - 3.7 range. Unless ever Porsche driver in the world is terrible and this guy is amazing it isn't happening.

Add another 50 - 70hp and sure it's entirely possible, just not stock.
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 03:13 AM
  #3236  
gill1606's Avatar
gill1606
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 601
Likes: 99
From: skyline boulevard
Well they also report a solid 13.0 sec quarter mile time which is excellent! for stock.
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 03:17 AM
  #3237  
sdwilly's Avatar
sdwilly
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by gill1606
Well they also report a solid 13.0 sec quarter mile time which is excellent! for stock.
13 is pretty solid, trap speed is pretty good and that 0 - 100 is respectable.

Q60 being slightly lighter (100lbs ish), should pull slightly better as well.

Plus turbo's are generally a lot friendly to tunes than N/A cars, so it will be interesting to see what they can get out of it (Though if I do have a concern, other than if the tranny can hold the additional power), would be that since they pretty much use the same engine in the 300 and 400hp versions that the tunes won't be able to do much with it. We will have to see on that one.
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 04:53 AM
  #3238  
ThebigJ's Avatar
ThebigJ
Registered Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 243
Likes: 17
The funny part is the more I look at Q60 the more Q50 grows on me
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 09:21 AM
  #3239  
Ape Factory's Avatar
Ape Factory
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 323
From: San Antonio, Texas
Went to the grand opening of an Infiniti dealer near me last night as they were supposed to have a black and a white one. White one sold, still had the black one. My wife really liked the car and said I should trade mine in, LOL. But it got LOTS of attention and I think it'll sell well based on what I saw.

They're not expecting a single RS til after the 1st of the year and he wasn't sure what else they'd be getting in as he didn't know what'd been ordered off hand. My second opinion visually, is the same as the first, I like it more than the current car. This one had more packages including the driver's assistance package so it had that HUGE emblem. And yeah, it's big and ugly. Other than that, the car looks great.

And looks like we're adding another car to the family. A QX70 Sport caught my wife's eye, specifically the 21" blacked out wheels, so that''ll be coming home with us in a day or two. I'd push her to a Q50RS but she wants an SUV. Happy wife, happy life.

May test drive the Q60 today if I have time.
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 09:52 AM
  #3240  
eljoker's Avatar
eljoker
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 192
There are like 3 or 4 videos of 0-60s from owners and test drivers floating around. All fall in the mid to upper 4s. If some one cracked 3.5 and it was believable, the Q50 forums would be blowing up along with the rest of the internet.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 PM.