Build Threads

My Mod + Dyno Log

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2013, 11:17 PM
  #31  
NeverEnough007
Registered User
 
NeverEnough007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 51
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Elohel
Does anyone else think the cost of those intakes are not nearly worth a 10 whp gain for only 1k rpms? That's barely a discernible difference in driving
Plus, an exhaust alone may bet about 10hp as well but, when you combine the 2, you may end up with 25-30hp. Add a tune to that and you are doing ok! It is all about the mods working with eachother to create a multiplier effect.
Old 12-02-2013, 07:54 AM
  #32  
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,862
Received 4,571 Likes on 3,422 Posts
Originally Posted by Elohel
Does anyone else think the cost of those intakes are not nearly worth a 10 whp gain for only 1k rpms? That's barely a discernible difference in driving
I suspect most people are pleased with their aftermarket intake, regardless of cost or gains (or loss).
Old 12-02-2013, 09:06 AM
  #33  
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
blnewt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Received 4,940 Likes on 4,174 Posts
Originally Posted by Rochester
I suspect most people are pleased with their aftermarket intake, regardless of cost or gains (or loss).
I know I am
It's pretty common knowledge that "intakes+VQ=addicting sound" and if you like the looks than that's a nice bonus, if you're after anything significant HP-wise than you'd better really open your wallet
Old 12-02-2013, 11:21 AM
  #34  
RexHavoc
Premier Member

iTrader: (7)
 
RexHavoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,795
Received 163 Likes on 143 Posts
^^^^
+1 here. I "feel" like there have been some gains, though minor, but it could also be that I'm enjoying it just a little more with the change in sound.
Old 12-02-2013, 11:41 AM
  #35  
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,862
Received 4,571 Likes on 3,422 Posts
Originally Posted by NeverEnough007
Plus, an exhaust alone may bet about 10hp as well but, when you combine the 2, you may end up with 25-30hp.
No, that's not even remotely accurate.

Manufacturer claims of HP gains are always optimistic. Irrespective of that, HP gains from Intake + Exhaust components are never cumulative, they are marginal at best. In fact, without a tune, and depending on the car and the parts, you could even be sacrificing HP while chasing a particular sound.

Also, HP gains at the curve are kind of meaningless for a daily driver (IMO). I'd rather lose peak HP and gain mid-range.
The following 2 users liked this post by Rochester:
Jack10525 (02-27-2014), samuel1021 (12-02-2013)
Old 12-02-2013, 12:09 PM
  #36  
Tim30250
Registered User
 
Tim30250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 73
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Unfortunately, that's true. Not only are gains from bolt-on mods marginal, but they are also diminishing. Even if you confirmed 10 HP from an intake and 10 HP from HFCs, independently - they wouldn't provide 20 HP cumulatively, perhaps 13-15 HP if you're lucky.

Regardless, modding is fun, and this thread is very interesting. Thanks again to Alfredo for taking the time to test and post up each result!
The following users liked this post:
alfredo24pr (12-02-2013)
Old 12-02-2013, 04:46 PM
  #37  
NeverEnough007
Registered User
 
NeverEnough007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 51
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Not sure where you guys get that idea. If you have a restricted exhaust, your car will only suck in so much air regardless of intake. Freeing up the exhaust allows more air flow through the motor. This give the "green light" for the motor to gulp more air from the intake. This has been proven on the dyno in other models I have owned. Maybe there is less relevance on the G since our intake and exhaust is already relatively open. Adding the tune allows you to break past the guard rails on factory settings giving more flow.
Old 12-02-2013, 05:34 PM
  #38  
GoFightNguyen
Because Racecar

iTrader: (14)
 
GoFightNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,543
Received 748 Likes on 356 Posts
Originally Posted by NeverEnough007
This give the "green light" for the motor to gulp more air from the intake. .
I'm not 100% sure if I agree with this. The G37 has a VQ37VHR motor in it, with a displacement of 3.7 liters. It gulps 3.7 liters of air. The density of that air is what people are trying to increase, either by getting it colder (CAI's), or compressed (SRI and FI). It's not like open intakes make the engine pull 3.8 liters of air, or 4.0 liters of air. The engine takes as much as it takes.
Old 12-02-2013, 06:10 PM
  #39  
Mad Oregonian
Registered User
 
Mad Oregonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think what he's trying to say is that by increasing efficiency at both ends one can increase the overall efficiency of the motor, thereby increasing power output. This is forever going to be hotly debated but at the end of the day someone has offered to give us a real world running total of his dyno readings as he mods his car, that will be where the rubber meets the (rolling) road for this discussion, until then all that is being passed out are opinions.
Old 12-02-2013, 06:29 PM
  #40  
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,862
Received 4,571 Likes on 3,422 Posts
Originally Posted by NeverEnough007
Not sure where you guys get that idea.
Pragmatic, real-world experience. The OEM exhaust and intake setup on the VQHR are pretty efficient already, so all I can recommend is that you don't get carried away with the unrealistic expectations of conventional wisdom.


Originally Posted by Mad Oregonian
This is forever going to be hotly debated but at the end of the day someone has offered to give us a real world running total of his dyno readings as he mods his car, that will be where the rubber meets the (rolling) road for this discussion, until then all that is being passed out are opinions.
What? No, there is no contention, no hot debate. There's just reality, and the ginned up expectations of people who modify their cars. And while it's very cool Alfredo has tasked himself with this mod/dyno regimen, people have been modifying the VQ platform for decades. Pretty sure no one is waiting for Alfredo to be the first one to modify a NISSAN, for crying out loud.

No offense, OP. This is a fun thread. Please continue.
Old 12-02-2013, 06:39 PM
  #41  
NeverEnough007
Registered User
 
NeverEnough007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 51
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Mad Oregonian
I think what he's trying to say is that by increasing efficiency at both ends one can increase the overall efficiency of the motor, thereby increasing power output. This is forever going to be hotly debated but at the end of the day someone has offered to give us a real world running total of his dyno readings as he mods his car, that will be where the rubber meets the (rolling) road for this discussion, until then all that is being passed out are opinions.
Exactly. The results will differ in different makes and models of course but, our cars still have bottlenecks in efficiency that hamper the motor. These are not carbureted motors, very sensor is connected and working in unison to create efficient power. There are a lot of NA vq35hr build threads out there and most of their learnings apply here.
Old 12-02-2013, 09:44 PM
  #42  
alfredo24pr
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
alfredo24pr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 796
Received 95 Likes on 79 Posts
lol. dynos are with 91 octane btw
Old 12-03-2013, 09:30 AM
  #43  
Daddy Fat Sacs
Registered Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Daddy Fat Sacs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,705
Received 357 Likes on 249 Posts
subscribed.....alfred..any other plans on mods besides cai and the hfc? I would assume cbe would be next?
Old 12-03-2013, 09:45 AM
  #44  
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,862
Received 4,571 Likes on 3,422 Posts
...after which, maybe the Motordyne M37 Intake Manifold before a tune?

Other than 4.083 gears, and weight reduction, doesn't that pretty much wrap up NA power mods?

Intake + UIM + HFC + CB + Tune =
Old 12-03-2013, 10:14 AM
  #45  
GoFightNguyen
Because Racecar

iTrader: (14)
 
GoFightNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,543
Received 748 Likes on 356 Posts
Originally Posted by Rochester
...after which, maybe the Motordyne M37 Intake Manifold before a tune?

Other than 4.083 gears, and weight reduction, doesn't that pretty much wrap up NA power mods?

Intake + UIM + HFC + CB + Tune =
Don't forget a pulley swap, drive shaft switch, and light wheels.


Quick Reply: My Mod + Dyno Log



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 PM.