Intake and Exhaust The ultimate forum to ask, discuss, and answer tech related questions regarding MyG37 intake and exhaust.

Injen Dyno Test #2 on a Stock Car

Old Jul 24, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #1  
herrjr's Avatar
herrjr
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Suburbia, CA
Injen Dyno Test #2 on a Stock Car

So after having several bumped appointments over the last couple weeks (and numerous PMs), the second dyno test finally happened yesterday evening. The ONLY difference from my baseline circumstances was that it was about 10 or so degrees warmer (did not capture humidity and wind for the baseline so I did not capture it last night). Fog covers were placed back on for this 2nd test, as well as only 91 oct CA Chevron.

The first run was conducted with the intake cool enough to grasp (compared with the infamous best run from the first test):


AFR:


1st run alone:


2nd run and AFR:



3rd run and AFR:



So best HP gain was about 6, and best TQ was about 2. Unfortunately, the peaks did not occur on the same run. It seems that as the intake got hotter, the HP dropped and the TQ increased. I'm gonna ceramic coat the pipes and cover them with heat-reflective shields, to better regulate the pipes from heating up. I will NOT be running anymore dyno tests with just the Injen on, so stop PMing me for info. requests now.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 02:02 PM
  #2  
Buddy Revell's Avatar
Buddy Revell
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
Thanks for the info. It's always good to get as many independent dynos of performance parts for our cars as possible.

Last edited by Buddy Revell; Jul 24, 2008 at 02:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #3  
RYs06MT's Avatar
RYs06MT
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 18
From: Honeycomb Hideout
Thank you for coming out and showing your results, you have a completely stock car, so all Injens claims have been proven wrong.

No one should bash this guy, it's not his fault, he just saved you all alot of money and time thinking you would really see 14whp on a stock car.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 02:53 PM
  #4  
Pms1212's Avatar
Pms1212
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RYs06MT
Thank you for coming out and showing your results, you have a completely stock car, so all Injens claims have been proven wrong.

No one should bash this guy, it's not his fault, he just saved you all alot of money and time thinking you would really see 14whp on a stock car.
As RYs06MT states, thank you for your dyno, and you basically received around the same WHP/TQ as mine. Your car is stock and mine isn't. I guess that is all to be said. As far as bashing I wouldn't worry about it because I was initially the one who took the bashing for my dyno first. And I'm still here. lol. What is comes down to is that the injens just don't produce the WHP. Everyone can have there opinion from here on out.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #5  
MaxToTheG37's Avatar
MaxToTheG37
Super Moderator w/ Boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,042
Likes: 5
From: Knoxville TN
Originally Posted by herrjr
So after having several bumped appointments over the last couple weeks (and numerous PMs), the second dyno test finally happened yesterday evening. The ONLY difference from my baseline circumstances was that it was about 10 or so degrees warmer (did not capture humidity and wind for the baseline so I did not capture it last night). Fog covers were placed back on for this 2nd test, as well as only 91 oct CA Chevron.

The first run was conducted with the intake cool enough to grasp (compared with the infamous best run from the first test):


AFR:


1st run alone:


2nd run and AFR:



3rd run and AFR:



So best HP gain was about 6, and best TQ was about 2. Unfortunately, the peaks did not occur on the same run. It seems that as the intake got hotter, the HP dropped and the TQ increased. I'm gonna ceramic coat the pipes and cover them with heat-reflective shields, to better regulate the pipes from heating up. I will NOT be running anymore dyno tests with just the Injen on, so stop PMing me for info. requests now.

thanks btw
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #6  
Blackjack's Avatar
Blackjack
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 8
From: The ATL
Originally Posted by RYs06MT
Thank you for coming out and showing your results, you have a completely stock car, so all Injens claims have been proven wrong.

No one should bash this guy, it's not his fault, he just saved you all alot of money and time thinking you would really see 14whp on a stock car.
No one is bashing him... Only Injen!
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #7  
RYs06MT's Avatar
RYs06MT
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 18
From: Honeycomb Hideout
^^ yeah for sure, I loved your picture. I was just saying I hope others don't come on here against him like they did PMS, blaming him for everything. It's all on Injen
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #8  
T-rek2's Avatar
T-rek2
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: montreal, canada
Thanks for the Dyno bro.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #9  
Pms1212's Avatar
Pms1212
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Blackjack
No one is bashing him... Only Injen!
Originally Posted by RYs06MT
^^ yeah for sure, I loved your picture. I was just saying I hope others don't come on here against him like they did PMS, blaming him for everything. It's all on Injen

Blackjack and yourself couldn't of said it any better......
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #10  
sTiLLBaLLiN37's Avatar
sTiLLBaLLiN37
Former Prez of LA G'Z
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 24
From: ~So.Cal~
Thanks to the OP for posting this, now Mods sticky this all over the boards LOL
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 04:15 PM
  #11  
herrjr's Avatar
herrjr
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Suburbia, CA
To clarify, the first test result (best run) was posted above in the first image, compared with the best HP run for the second test. It shows the +2 hp and
-3 tq that some people knew compared with the baseline runs. The best run from the baseline was 262 hp and about 212 tq.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #12  
sTiLLBaLLiN37's Avatar
sTiLLBaLLiN37
Former Prez of LA G'Z
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 24
From: ~So.Cal~
Okay I am a complete newb to dyno sheets, what were the final gains on this dyno?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 04:22 PM
  #13  
ucla bruin's Avatar
ucla bruin
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 3
From: Orange County
Thanks for the post!
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #14  
Pms1212's Avatar
Pms1212
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sTiLLBaLLiN37
Okay I am a complete newb to dyno sheets, what were the final gains on this dyno?

It looks like to me it's +5WHP/+3TQ. Anybody correct me if I am wrong.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #15  
sTiLLBaLLiN37's Avatar
sTiLLBaLLiN37
Former Prez of LA G'Z
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 24
From: ~So.Cal~
Originally Posted by Pms1212
It looks like to me it's +5WHP/+3TQ. Anybody correct me if I am wrong.
wow no comment on that
Thanks PMS
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM.