G37 Sedan

What vehicle will be a worthy replacement for your sedan when it is time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 11:55 AM
  #1426  
4DRZ's Avatar
4DRZ
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
So I was trying to figure out if this ATS-V had any packages on it and it looks like just the polished wheels and Recaro seats (very basic). For 2017 the Bose Audio is in the Luxury Package, but it also includes navigation, alloy pedals, and a bunch of other items this car didn't have. So the Bose must have been a stand alone option in 2016 because this car had it. I looked everywhere online, but cannot find a 2016 brochure.

Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 12:34 PM
  #1427  
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 528
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by 4DRZ
Those magazines are right about the gauges looking a bit plain and the CUE system might be ever so slightly slower to use until you get accustomed to the touch screen buttons for everything, but those are very minor complaints in an otherwise exceptional car. They also fail to mention how nice it is to be able to pick 3 display screens right in the dash for very important data that can be customized. I have not seen any write ups or even pictures of the heads up display and performance data recorder, but I imagine those would be pretty cool to have too.

I have not driven a new M3 yet as my BMW store gets lots of M3's, but almost exclusively with the DCT. If any of our stores ever gets a used manual I will be sure to check it out.
I had to look back at this:

Originally Posted by 4DRZ

While seemingly minor, the lack of buttons would be a huge PITA. My wife has a '17 Accord, which doesn't have a volume ****, but instead has a slider in the display. Virtually impossible for to adjust when moving. The fact that the HVAC controls are like that too would seemingly make it tough to adjust when moving--much easier to rotate a ****.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 12:48 PM
  #1428  
Rochester's Avatar
Rochester
Administrator
15 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,829
Likes: 5,137
From: Rochester, NY
When the current gen CR-V came out, Honda couldn't stop bragging how they put the volume **** back in their radio. It was a thing for them.

You know, I really don't like gratuitous metallic looking trim on a dashboard, console and doors. And I like gratuitous CF pieces even less. At least there isn't any fake stitching on plastics... that's a bridge too far.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 01:09 PM
  #1429  
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 528
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Rochester
When the current gen CR-V came out, Honda couldn't stop bragging how they put the volume **** back in their radio. It was a thing for them.

You know, I really don't like gratuitous metallic looking trim on a dashboard, console and doors. And I like gratuitous CF pieces even less. At least there isn't any fake stitching on plastics... that's a bridge too far.

Same thing with the Accord redesign. You wouldn't think it's as big of an issue as it is. Volume **** is at least something you can work around via steering wheel controls (at least for the driver). Trying to manipulate the HVAC with that interface would be tough.

The more I look at the interior, the less I like it
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 02:10 PM
  #1430  
4DRZ's Avatar
4DRZ
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Originally Posted by Lego_Maniac
I had to look back at this:



While seemingly minor, the lack of buttons would be a huge PITA. My wife has a '17 Accord, which doesn't have a volume ****, but instead has a slider in the display. Virtually impossible for to adjust when moving. The fact that the HVAC controls are like that too would seemingly make it tough to adjust when moving--much easier to rotate a ****.
I didn't have any problem adjusting either while driving due to the smooth ride. I could not say the same for my car on a bumpy road. Then again I almost never adjust the climate. I just leave it on auto. I adjust the volume on the steering wheel. The only adjustment I made on the center console was the heated seat and it seemed to work fine. It is really not a deal breaker for me as I really never touch that stuff, but I agree that I would have also preferred actual buttons. No need to try to reinvent the wheel here Cadillac.

Thankfully for me, the Recaro seats make a few little "wrongs" for me with the interior just right. The relief of not trying to screw around with aftermarket seats again also makes me pretty happy. I have heard some horror stories of trying to do this on GM cars.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2018 | 04:54 PM
  #1431  
Enzo1330's Avatar
Enzo1330
Registered Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
For me I am going to be getting out of the car game for a little while. I am thinking about buying a Silverado since I enjoy hunting and want to buy a boat and need something that can tow. But I keep flip flopping between that and the Jeep SRT.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 12:44 AM
  #1432  
qmantran's Avatar
qmantran
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 183
From: ATX
Been toying with the idea of a used 2012-2013 BMW 335i Sedan. I've seen some on youtube with pure stage 2 turbo upgrade making 500whp easily. The turbo is less than $3k.

Anyone here familiar with that platform? Would like to hear some opinions about the 2012+ 335i in general.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 08:55 AM
  #1433  
RMB5190's Avatar
RMB5190
Super Moderator
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 504
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by qmantran
Been toying with the idea of a used 2012-2013 BMW 335i Sedan. I've seen some on youtube with pure stage 2 turbo upgrade making 500whp easily. The turbo is less than $3k.

Anyone here familiar with that platform? Would like to hear some opinions about the 2012+ 335i in general.
If it were going to be a project car, I'd go for a BMW with the N54 power plant. It's the more tuner friendly motor, twin turbos and a forged crank vs the single twin scroll and the cast crank. That said, if you're planning on keeping the car under 600whp you should be good with internals of anything with a N55 power plant. Reliability favors the N55 as well.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 10:43 AM
  #1434  
qmantran's Avatar
qmantran
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 183
From: ATX
Originally Posted by RMB5190
If it were going to be a project car, I'd go for a BMW with the N54 power plant. It's the more tuner friendly motor, twin turbos and a forged crank vs the single twin scroll and the cast crank. That said, if you're planning on keeping the car under 600whp you should be good with internals of anything with a N55 power plant. Reliability favors the N55 as well.
Thanks for the input. I have heard the same about the N54 motor however it wouldn't be a project car. It would be a replacement for the G37. So a daily driver.

I stated 2012+ sedans because that's the new gen F30 body style. It looks more modern than the old E9x models. They appear too dated imo.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 08:28 PM
  #1435  
4DRZ's Avatar
4DRZ
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Originally Posted by RMB5190
If it were going to be a project car, I'd go for a BMW with the N54 power plant. It's the more tuner friendly motor, twin turbos and a forged crank vs the single twin scroll and the cast crank. That said, if you're planning on keeping the car under 600whp you should be good with internals of anything with a N55 power plant. Reliability favors the N55 as well.
I always get the N54 and N55 mixed up. Which engine is in the 2015+ M3? I know those can be over 500 whp with just a tune. Can you do something similar with regular 3 series or do you need to replace turbos to get there?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 10:56 PM
  #1436  
qmantran's Avatar
qmantran
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 183
From: ATX
Originally Posted by 4DRZ
I always get the N54 and N55 mixed up. Which engine is in the 2015+ M3? I know those can be over 500 whp with just a tune. Can you do something similar with regular 3 series or do you need to replace turbos to get there?
n54 is in the 06 335i has 2 turbos
n55 was first used in the 09 535i and 2010 335i. Single twin scroll turbo
2014+ m3 is s55 motor. It has 2 turbos according to wiki
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2018 | 07:58 AM
  #1437  
RMB5190's Avatar
RMB5190
Super Moderator
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 504
From: Maryland
Qman hit it.

To my understanding, the N54 was an "experimental" engine from the sounds of it. The N55 was created as a successor but with reliability/fuel efficiency in mind. If It were a tuning platform I was choosing, the N54 without a doubt would be the one I'd go with. If I were looking to go no more than 400whp then the N55 would be the choice to go with.

The S55 basically took the best of both the N54 and N55 while eliminating their weaknesses.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2018 | 01:31 PM
  #1438  
4DRZ's Avatar
4DRZ
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Originally Posted by qmantran
n54 is in the 06 335i has 2 turbos
n55 was first used in the 09 535i and 2010 335i. Single twin scroll turbo
2014+ m3 is s55 motor. It has 2 turbos according to wiki
Oh yeah, the M3 is the S55. I always screw that up. Was the N54 just used in model year 2006? Can you get 500+ whp out of that motor with tuning or do you need new turbos?

Originally Posted by RMB5190
Qman hit it.

To my understanding, the N54 was an "experimental" engine from the sounds of it. The N55 was created as a successor but with reliability/fuel efficiency in mind. If It were a tuning platform I was choosing, the N54 without a doubt would be the one I'd go with. If I were looking to go no more than 400whp then the N55 would be the choice to go with.

The S55 basically took the best of both the N54 and N55 while eliminating their weaknesses.
That makes sense. If you can get 500 whp out of an N54 that would make a good option for me instead of an M3. I think they made that car with AWD and a manual transmission? Does that sound right? Hmmm....
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2018 | 02:08 PM
  #1439  
RMB5190's Avatar
RMB5190
Super Moderator
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 504
From: Maryland
100% capable of 500 whp on stock turbos and internals.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2018 | 08:00 PM
  #1440  
4DRZ's Avatar
4DRZ
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Originally Posted by RMB5190
100% capable of 500 whp on stock turbos and internals.
Hmmm, very interesting. Is it just the 2006 335i that has the N54?

Edit: Nevermind, I see it was used in 2006-2010 335i and 2011-2013 335is (according to wikipedia)

However, was it ever in an AWD 6spd? That would be a killer combo

Last edited by 4DRZ; Dec 29, 2018 at 08:06 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM.