G37 Sedan
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Sedan weight reduction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2017, 11:23 PM
  #61  
g37tac
Registered Member
 
g37tac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 19
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Also, the spare tire/wheel and tool kit were 30# and 8# respectively.
Old 06-05-2017, 05:51 PM
  #62  
4DRZ
Registered Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
4DRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 4,724
Received 697 Likes on 499 Posts
Originally Posted by g37tac
I weighed my stock cats last night; they weighed 10lb each.

According to Motordyne, this is the same weight as the ART pipes that I installed. No weight benefit I guess.

I also have a pair of Berk HFCs laying around that I can weigh later on...
Hmmm... still waiting to hear back from Z1 on the weight of their cats. I don't remember them being super light, but maybe.

Originally Posted by g37tac
Also, the spare tire/wheel and tool kit were 30# and 8# respectively.
Well, the spare tire will stay in as most car companies consider that part of the crash structure. However, I do pull out the tools. When you say "tool kit" are you including the jack?
Old 06-05-2017, 06:26 PM
  #63  
g37tac
Registered Member
 
g37tac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 19
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 4DRZ
Hmmm... still waiting to hear back from Z1 on the weight of their cats. I don't remember them being super light, but maybe.



Well, the spare tire will stay in as most car companies consider that part of the crash structure. However, I do pull out the tools. When you say "tool kit" are you including the jack?
Yes, the entire black styrofoam insert with jack and accessories weighs about 8lbs
Old 07-01-2017, 11:28 AM
  #64  
Mattlorentzoe
Premier Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Mattlorentzoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Gwinnett County, Georgia
Posts: 773
Received 156 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by ZahyMatar
Switch to a true-type coilovers setup in the rear, it will allow you to replace the spring buckets with toe arms... Should be decent weight reduction.
^^Thisssss. Anybody know the difference? I would think it would be a decent loss for sure.
Old 07-01-2017, 01:28 PM
  #65  
4DRZ
Registered Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
4DRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 4,724
Received 697 Likes on 499 Posts
Originally Posted by lorentzoe45
^^Thisssss. Anybody know the difference? I would think it would be a decent loss for sure.
That's possible. Does anyone make a decent set? All the ones I looked at have a separate spring. I wonder if the suspension will work ok and have the strength to support a spring in that area when it was originally designed to just work with the damper.
Old 07-01-2017, 02:50 PM
  #66  
iCrap
Registered Member
iTrader: (8)
 
iCrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,513
Received 607 Likes on 452 Posts
Yeah, I highly doubt it. I keep seeing "oh its better" but nobody has a proper explanation on WHY a true type coil is "better." I mean Nissan clearly chose to do this for a reason. And the stock strut mounting points are seriously weak looking as well.

I was also working on a family member's S5 and saw it has the exact same rear suspension (seperate spring) type. There must be some advantage to it.
Old 07-01-2017, 08:45 PM
  #67  
slartibartfast
Super Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
slartibartfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 6,090
Received 836 Likes on 715 Posts
You'll have to visit My370Z forum to find the true-type users. Most think the upper mount area can support true-type unless you're racing. The biggest problem is access to top-mounted adjusters.

Stance, among others, makes true-type coil-overs. Check the slightly out-of-date coil-over redux thread.
Old 07-02-2017, 02:13 PM
  #68  
ezbme
Registered Member
 
ezbme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Capistrano Beach
Posts: 652
Received 35 Likes on 32 Posts
I worry about how well the lightweight batteries perform. I have heard good things on here.

Z1 2 Piece Rotors -20 lbs
New Header -10 lbs
Spare Tire Delete -40 lbs
Coilovers -10 lbs
Tomei Exh Muffler -15 lbs
New X Pipe and Pipe to Mufflers -10 lbs perhaps

That would be about 105 lbs and pretty balanced. I have already replaced my battery and bought brakes, so perhaps later.

Most of this would add performance and lose weight. The carbon fiber hoods are nice, yet expensive but pretty easy to install. The trunk would be harder to install.
Old 07-04-2017, 07:46 PM
  #69  
4DRZ
Registered Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
4DRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 4,724
Received 697 Likes on 499 Posts
Originally Posted by ezbme
I worry about how well the lightweight batteries perform. I have heard good things on here.

Z1 2 Piece Rotors -20 lbs
New Header -10 lbs
Spare Tire Delete -40 lbs
Coilovers -10 lbs
Tomei Exh Muffler -15 lbs
New X Pipe and Pipe to Mufflers -10 lbs perhaps

That would be about 105 lbs and pretty balanced. I have already replaced my battery and bought brakes, so perhaps later.

Most of this would add performance and lose weight. The carbon fiber hoods are nice, yet expensive but pretty easy to install. The trunk would be harder to install.
I'm not quite sure how you would lose weight replacing your X-pipe and midpipe, especially if you went with a larger diameter, but more power to you if you did.

You may want to put that spare tire back. Most manufacturers use that as part of the crash structure in an accident.
Old 07-05-2017, 12:46 AM
  #70  
JustROLLIN
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
JustROLLIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 273
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
We have a solid discussion going about this topic in regards to two piece rotors. Bottom line, these are cars that benefit greatly from unsprung weight reductions due to their initial weight from the factory.

That can be said for nearly any car, but ours are quite heavy on all four corners.
Old 07-05-2017, 03:42 PM
  #71  
4DRZ
Registered Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
4DRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 4,724
Received 697 Likes on 499 Posts
Originally Posted by ezbme
I worry about how well the lightweight batteries perform. I have heard good things on here.
I have been trying to find a lithium ion one that does not give up any CCA for our cold WI winters, but they cost $500+ I am sure that will eventually come down in price...

Originally Posted by JustROLLIN
We have a solid discussion going about this topic in regards to two piece rotors. Bottom line, these are cars that benefit greatly from unsprung weight reductions due to their initial weight from the factory.

That can be said for nearly any car, but ours are quite heavy on all four corners.
I agree. Z1 rotors are on my list.

Anyone know if you lose much weight with a carbon hood or trunk? I am looking for a vented hood to help with the temps on track and Seibon's carbon fiber one seems to be one of the only options. Not sure I would lose too much weight though as the hood is already aluminum.


Old 07-26-2017, 06:18 PM
  #72  
G37_4DR
Registered User
 
G37_4DR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 212
Received 39 Likes on 28 Posts
Wanted to contribute to this thread with some additional data points. My trunk is completely gutted - save for some seam sealer that I didn't bother scrapping off.







So what does this stuff weigh? Here are my numbers using my own body weight as a baseline and then taking a follow-up reading while standing on the scale and holding said items.

Spare tire - 33.4 lbs.
Foam tool tray with all factory tools - 8.4 lbs.
All trunk liners, batting, trunk mat (basic), and hardware - 13.2 lbs.
Sound deadening (two 11" x 7" spots on wheel wells and one 11" x 32" spot on trunk floor) - 2.5 lbs. (estimated)
Cargo net - 3.9 oz.

Total savings: Approx. 58 lbs.


Additional items:
Owners manuals bundle: 2 lbs. 3.3 oz




Hood liner: 1.8 lbs.




Window washer fluid reservoir (measured while filled with water): 12.2 lbs.



Total weight reduction: Approx 73 lbs.

Now, in terms of practicality... Well, that's a whole different story

Last edited by G37_4DR; 07-26-2017 at 06:45 PM.
The following users liked this post:
SupraOfDoom (10-19-2019)
Old 07-28-2017, 07:45 PM
  #73  
4DRZ
Registered Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
4DRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 4,724
Received 697 Likes on 499 Posts
Originally Posted by G37_4DR
Total weight reduction: Approx 73 lbs.

Now, in terms of practicality... Well, that's a whole different story
Nice!

FYI- you may want to put the spare tire back in just in case you get rear ended as most companies use that as part of the crumple zone.
Old 07-28-2017, 09:51 PM
  #74  
G37_4DR
Registered User
 
G37_4DR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 212
Received 39 Likes on 28 Posts
Valid consideration, 4DRZ. Interestingly enough, though, many new cars are being produced with tire sealant and an inflator kit in place of a spare tire. Check out this article: https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/...tire/index.htm. I wonder if they're having to engineer the rear of the vehicle differently in order to meet crash test standards without a spare tire in place. Also consider SUVs which, in many cases, have their spare tires mounted vertically inside the cargo area or mounted outside on the rear door (RAV4, Wrangler, Hummer H2 + H3, etc.).
Old 07-30-2017, 04:48 PM
  #75  
Man
Registered User
 
Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Houston, Texas->Nashville,Tennessee
Posts: 24
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is making me too sad.
If you wanted some easy ounces there's always floor mats, headrests, glovebox, rear speakers (fronts are a necessity in my mind).
You're getting close to being able to sell all the parts and buy another G!


Quick Reply: Sedan weight reduction



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM.