G37 Sedan

Infiniti G25 First Impressions...

Old Oct 26, 2010 | 03:56 PM
  #46  
joelamp's Avatar
joelamp
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by JohnEnglish
Samething that BMW, Lexus, and Mercedes are thinking with the 328i, IS250, and C300?
+1

I don't understand corporate Nissan/Infiniti's rationale for not making Navi and Lux pkgs available on the G25, but it is a sweet car. Looks gorgeous, has a terrific interior and superior handling and braking.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #47  
volnedan's Avatar
volnedan
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Test drove one last week, and overall I was quite underwhelmed. Maybe cuz I went from my G37, but the engine felt as weak as my wife's current 2.5L Altima. The lack of options is what the deal breaker is going to be for my wife. She's always liked my car, but doesn't need the 330hp and wants AWD w/o having to pay over $35k.

We thought this would be a good alternative, but at $35k sticker with just moonroof and no available nav its a bit overpriced for what you get. Its unfair to the customer not to offer a high volume option such as nav, when I can get it on an Altima or even a Honda Civic. Poor marketing by Infiniti.

Last edited by volnedan; Nov 1, 2010 at 02:25 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 10:35 PM
  #48  
gee wiz's Avatar
gee wiz
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 300
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
A few comments have been made on the G25 fuel economy not being a whole lot better than the G37, which got me wondering: What is the factory recommended fuel (octane) for the G25?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 11:35 PM
  #49  
dsnke1's Avatar
dsnke1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
There will be no G25 coupe, am I right? Please oh please tell me Im right...
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 12:20 AM
  #50  
g25dragon's Avatar
g25dragon
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gee wiz
A few comments have been made on the G25 fuel economy not being a whole lot better than the G37, which got me wondering: What is the factory recommended fuel (octane) for the G25?
The owner's manual I received with my g25 is actually for the g37, so it lists premium. The compression ratio is a little lower than the g37 at 10.3, so a midgrade might run okay, but I haven't tried yet.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 12:57 AM
  #51  
JohnEnglish's Avatar
JohnEnglish
Registered Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by gee wiz
A few comments have been made on the G25 fuel economy not being a whole lot better than the G37, which got me wondering: What is the factory recommended fuel (octane) for the G25?
Infiniti says to use premium.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #52  
gee wiz's Avatar
gee wiz
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 300
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by JohnEnglish
Infiniti says to use premium.
Well, that takes away any fuel cost savings at the pump. Thought maybe if the G25 could run on a lesser grade fuel it would present an additional advantage for some buyers, but evidently not the case.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #53  
da mayor's Avatar
da mayor
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 36
From: Long Island, NY
the price conscious doesn't care about navigation. Plus having navigation as a dealer installed option we're installing them left and right for clients who want a touch screen nav system and works fine
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 12:11 PM
  #54  
PascalT's Avatar
PascalT
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
The nav system to me was an overpriced option easily replaced with a $200 Garmin GPS... they probably thought the more budget-conscious G25 drivers won't want it enough to warrant whatever production changes they might need to do (if any?).
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2010 | 01:05 AM
  #55  
SnoopSER's Avatar
SnoopSER
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: the Salty D(San Diego,CA)
Originally Posted by ScottyBeGood
While Infiniti's goal with this car is to try keep the G25 as basic as possible, it could do better if it included not only the Premium package but also included the Navigation package. These are just some of the items that many buyers actually want on their cars. I mean even when you compare the BMW 328 to the G25 these options are made available. To make this car more competitive in the market and while I know this is the first year or test year, the options should be made available either as a package or a separate add on.
I 100% agree with you here! If it weren't for the lack of options I'd think about getting one(especially at their price!) but they're basically G shells with a weaker engine... not cool!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2010 | 02:32 PM
  #56  
volnedan's Avatar
volnedan
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit, MI
A $35,000 car is not a "price-conscious" choice of vehicle. A Nissan Versa without A/C is a budget car. Why is there navigation availabe in all kinds of vehicles yet a "premium" brand doesn't offer it just because the engine is smaller? Thats just plain retarded.

Audi downgraded the A4's engine to the point where a V-6 isn't available, yet they still offer every list of options as before. (yes I know the S4 has a V-6 before I get flamed).

Some people don't like having to squint at a 3.5 inch screen when an available 7 inch screen is an option. Stupid is as stupid does.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2010 | 08:19 PM
  #57  
da mayor's Avatar
da mayor
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 36
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by volnedan
Audi downgraded the A4's engine to the point where a V-6 isn't available, yet they still offer every list of options as before. (yes I know the S4 has a V-6 before I get flamed).
but would you pay $47k for a freaking Audi A4 4-cylinder? Or how about $48k for a BMW 328xi sedan with no back up camera?

It's not going to suite everyone's needs but again it's there to reach out to a different market.

I just seen 3 or 4 clients this weekend take the G25x over the Nissan Altima because of the all wheel drive option, the lease payment was only $18 dollars more per month, and they felt the fit and finish was 10x better.

you can go back and forth all day. I'm a performance guy, I won't bother to look at the G37x... even if gas was $5.00 a gallon, I'd just drive my G37 slower.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #58  
SnoopSER's Avatar
SnoopSER
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: the Salty D(San Diego,CA)
Just saw 1 for the 1st time today... A chick was driving it, she was about 24-27yrs old, and that's what I see this version of the G geared towards..1st time entry level lux buyers, and or women who don't want or need the extra power of the G37.. Just my opinion.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2010 | 10:57 PM
  #59  
Wongster's Avatar
Wongster
Registered Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 192
Likes: 7
From: SF, CA
The G25 and it's available features are very competitive in it's price range for an entry level luxury car. Sure, Audi and BMW have navigation available on their low end cars but how much is that going to cost you? Let's face it most of the Audis and BMWs out there are leased lower end models with only one or two option packages (BMW in particular) and most do not have navi.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2010 | 09:01 AM
  #60  
KLB's Avatar
KLB
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
What is the hangup with the factory installed Nav? It isn't like you can't get it. The dealer can add it for anyone that wants it.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 PM.