G37 Coupe

Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 12:19 PM
  #3421  
User 122320's Avatar
User 122320
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 907
Likes: 75
Originally Posted by eljoker
I think the Hyundia guys was drunk when designing the Genesis coupe.



Less we forget where Infinits styleing comes from.

And what happen to saywut?
Essence concept was revealed in 2012. Genesis coupe with that ugly scoop in the quarter window released in 2007.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 12:30 PM
  #3422  
gill1606's Avatar
gill1606
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 601
Likes: 99
From: skyline boulevard
i dont know what you are talking about. the crescent tapered at the end is a nice touch in my opinion, it accents the aero form of the coupe. The smooth elegant curve ending in a sharp, pointed tapering. I dont think Infiniti was copying the Genesis, its a signature design relative to all their other cars as well.

the 60's design also looks newer and much more aggressive than the 35's. especially the front, and the tail lamps are sharper and more elegant as opposed to the broad structure on the 35.











Last edited by gill1606; Sep 28, 2016 at 01:00 PM.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 12:47 PM
  #3423  
eljoker's Avatar
eljoker
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 192
Originally Posted by clutchfan
Essence concept was revealed in 2012. Genesis coupe with that ugly scoop in the quarter window released in 2007.
Holy ships, I stand corrected.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 01:38 PM
  #3424  
Q602B's Avatar
Q602B
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 7
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by clutchfan
Essence concept was revealed in 2012. Genesis coupe with that ugly scoop in the quarter window released in 2007.
Being reading this forum since 2011 and I never felt more compelled to register until now.

The current Infiniti exterior design language was heavily influenced from the 2009 Infiniti Essence Concept and to a lesser degree, the 2011 Etherea Concept. Going forward, Infiniti will incorporate the design language from those two aforementioned concepts along with the 2012 Emege-e concept, the 2014 Q80 Inspiration, and the 2016 QX Sport Inspiration.

Infiniti enthusiasts, although few in numbers, should know this and that the current crop of Infiniti cars borrowed no other design language other than its own. This no truer statement even if other makes bear resemblance to some of the current crop of Infiniti cars.

And there is no relatable C-Pillar kink in the GC you mentioned...if the kink was borrowed from anyone, it would be the Bimmer Hofmeister Kink....

Last edited by Q602B; Sep 28, 2016 at 01:53 PM.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 05:36 PM
  #3425  
eljoker's Avatar
eljoker
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 192
Originally Posted by eljoker
Holy ships, I stand corrected.
I guess I wasn't that wrong.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 05:44 PM
  #3426  
eljoker's Avatar
eljoker
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 192
Guess they cracked the ECU on the 300 hp TT.

First ever silver sport 3.0tt tuned - Infiniti Q50 Forum

Numbers look good but there is something about "throwing belts". My only guess is would be drive belts? I dont see why those would be a weaker point unless the Red Sport has a thinker belt. I know the Red Sport would have a longer belt because I assume the 2nd water bump would be belt driven.

But hey, the ECU is cracked, thats a start!
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 06:40 PM
  #3427  
gill1606's Avatar
gill1606
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 601
Likes: 99
From: skyline boulevard
Originally Posted by eljoker
Guess they cracked the ECU on the 300 hp TT.

First ever silver sport 3.0tt tuned - Infiniti Q50 Forum

Numbers look good but there is something about "throwing belts". My only guess is would be drive belts? I dont see why those would be a weaker point unless the Red Sport has a thinker belt. I know the Red Sport would have a longer belt because I assume the 2nd water bump would be belt driven.

But hey, the ECU is cracked, thats a start!
*talking on the phone* "Yes, hello sir. I have a question. Can you guys swap out an Infiniti 7AT for a Dual Clutch Transmission? How much are we looking at?" LOL
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 09:22 PM
  #3428  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
KAHBOOM
Super Moderator of Pwnage
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 195
From: NC
Originally Posted by Ape Factory
Interesting marketing/advertising story about Infiniti's new approach.
Infiniti works to hone its ?entrepreneurial? positioning | Analysis | Campaign Asia
That's a great article. I think we all can personally relate to the following statement:
"We’re obviously not a traditional luxury brand. We’re providing a different offering and not trying to be everything to everyone; rather, we want to be everything to some. In that way we’re more of a niche brand."

I've always felt that once you've come to know Infiniti (specifically the G)and identity it's a fit for you, one will be quite likely to be brand loyal.
It's why we all appreciate what the G had to offer.
But with the Q60, we are all having to reacquaint ourselves with the brand.
It's a risk for brand loyalty- but they've kept just enough of the elements that made the G successful that they just might pull this off.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 09:29 PM
  #3429  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
KAHBOOM
Super Moderator of Pwnage
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 195
From: NC
Originally Posted by eljoker
Guess they cracked the ECU on the 300 hp TT.

First ever silver sport 3.0tt tuned - Infiniti Q50 Forum

Numbers look good but there is something about "throwing belts". My only guess is would be drive belts? I dont see why those would be a weaker point unless the Red Sport has a thinker belt. I know the Red Sport would have a longer belt because I assume the 2nd water bump would be belt driven.

But hey, the ECU is cracked, thats a start!
Seems a bit risky without the extra hardware, cooling and optical sensors.
There is a reason Infiniti put that in the RS.
But to your point- at least we know the ECU can be hacked
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 10:32 PM
  #3430  
eljoker's Avatar
eljoker
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 192
Originally Posted by KAHBOOM
Seems a bit risky without the extra hardware, cooling and optical sensors.
There is a reason Infiniti put that in the RS.
But to your point- at least we know the ECU can be hacked
Yeah, idk. Long term that's what's going to matter. Is the 300hp going to run to hot when bumping up the boost? And now that some one has gotten into the ECU, how long before companies like Uprev have a tune?

Good news is that, it appears we don't have to wait to long as development is moving along swiftly. Kinda glad I'm not buying the first Red Sport we get next month. Gotta see which model is the better play In the long run.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 11:14 PM
  #3431  
ThebigJ's Avatar
ThebigJ
Registered Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 243
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by eljoker
Yeah, idk. Long term that's what's going to matter. Is the 300hp going to run to hot when bumping up the boost? And now that some one has gotten into the ECU, how long before companies like Uprev have a tune?

Good news is that, it appears we don't have to wait to long as development is moving along swiftly. Kinda glad I'm not buying the first Red Sport we get next month. Gotta see which model is the better play In the long run.
I guess the reason why they are charging more for RS is mostly try and see what goes wrong and in the mean time don't lose money because I don't think what they did to the car justifies 7K difference.

I also believe that reliability will depend strongly on how much you push the car to the limits. I think if you track this thing it may spend a considerable amount of time in the shop.
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 12:42 AM
  #3432  
gill1606's Avatar
gill1606
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 601
Likes: 99
From: skyline boulevard
Originally Posted by ThebigJ
I guess the reason why they are charging more for RS is mostly try and see what goes wrong and in the mean time don't lose money because I don't think what they did to the car justifies 7K difference.

I also believe that reliability will depend strongly on how much you push the car to the limits. I think if you track this thing it may spend a considerable amount of time in the shop.
i agree, they should have the 7AT in the 300HP and 200HP versions, and added a DCT to the 400 Red Sport. Yea that would have made more sense.
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 01:17 AM
  #3433  
P Casey's Avatar
P Casey
Premier Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,960
Likes: 34
From: San Antonio, TX
The back looks great the rest of the car looks bad, end of story. Sorry but I'd rather buy an IPL used and add a blower. The car won't be fast, and some of the comments on here are amazing.
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 02:14 AM
  #3434  
User 122320's Avatar
User 122320
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 907
Likes: 75
Is it just me or did Infinti blow the launch of the Q60 coupe just like they did when they first launched the Q50 sedan.
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 11:37 AM
  #3435  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
KAHBOOM
Super Moderator of Pwnage
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 195
From: NC
Originally Posted by clutchfan
Is it just me or did Infinti blow the launch of the Q60 coupe just like they did when they first launched the Q50 sedan.
I wouldn't say that. The Q50- I didn't even know it was released until one day I saw one at the dealership. The Q60 has been branded and advertised pretty aggressively.
There appears to be a lot more information available on it than there was with the release of the Q50.
I just think that there are a few items that we all wished the Q60 RS had that it doesn't have and many are focusing on that as opposed to looking at what the Q60 really does bring to the table.

Last edited by KAHBOOM; Sep 29, 2016 at 05:14 PM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.