G37 7speed transmission reprogram
ANMVQ: Betchya it's in 6th or 7th gear at 35mph. That's the problem with this tranny. Somehere in this thread a member explained that even at a slower speed than 35 mph, the tranny was in a top gear. on local road, D Mode, at 30 or so, I see the RPMs at 1500 and I feel that "torque Converter" feeling, if you know what I mean..... if I flick it into DS mode, and upshift it will be in 5th gear {that's the only way you know what gear you are in while in DS mode} and either Beeps me that the speed is too slow for the upshift [which makes sense at that speed] and doesn't do it or with a little gas, it will upshift to 6th. It's at those speeds and revs that the hesitation is experienced - too much loickup of the torque converter for higher gears and better mileage !!
Fish: If I recall, you were very haqppy with the Reflash and the results. Your comments seem to indicate otherwise. Mine is erratic. Today with a cold morning I pushed it, operation was while cold was not too good. But i know that the TCM it is engineered to perform better as it warms. There are measures in the programing to account for that. Other cars - we now own a 2010 Subbie Legacy 2.5i, the manual says that the CVT tranny will perform in a certain manner until it reaches real nromal operating temps.
Marc,
I agree with most of what you said. They all make sense. But I think 7AT itself is just a marketing joke which is designed to "keep up" with Lexus/MB's 8sp. All they need to do is to keep the same 5AT, then slap the 6th gear for high way cruising. I think most of us would be much more happy.
I heard Acura has just added the 6th gear to their TL, so I'll probably test drive the refreshed TL which by the way looks tons better than before but still not good enough. So I'll wait for the next gen TL
To be honest, I am starting to get tired of my G after 2 years with all the road noise, soft paint. The transmission is not a big deal to me because I do mostly highway driving and am willing to use those paddle shifters if I need it to downshift quickly.
I agree with most of what you said. They all make sense. But I think 7AT itself is just a marketing joke which is designed to "keep up" with Lexus/MB's 8sp. All they need to do is to keep the same 5AT, then slap the 6th gear for high way cruising. I think most of us would be much more happy.
I heard Acura has just added the 6th gear to their TL, so I'll probably test drive the refreshed TL which by the way looks tons better than before but still not good enough. So I'll wait for the next gen TL
To be honest, I am starting to get tired of my G after 2 years with all the road noise, soft paint. The transmission is not a big deal to me because I do mostly highway driving and am willing to use those paddle shifters if I need it to downshift quickly.
I agree with some of the points, but to me the issue is mostly not torque related....if you watch the tach while the "lag" is occurring, the transmission looks "confused". The lag seems to be caused by it not knowing it needs to downshift now, and not wait a second or two. To me, thats a software issue........even if there is a lack of low end torque, there should be a way to program around it.
The shifting should be based at least somewhat on load and accelerator position, so when the car is under load at that RPM and the gas pedal is pressed a certain amount, it should downshift........shouldnt make any difference the amount of torque the engine is putting out.
The shifting should be based at least somewhat on load and accelerator position, so when the car is under load at that RPM and the gas pedal is pressed a certain amount, it should downshift........shouldnt make any difference the amount of torque the engine is putting out.
Last edited by Marc Collins; Mar 3, 2011 at 05:09 PM.
Fish: If I recall, you were very haqppy with the Reflash and the results. Your comments seem to indicate otherwise. Mine is erratic. Today with a cold morning I pushed it, operation was while cold was not too good. But i know that the TCM it is engineered to perform better as it warms. There are measures in the programing to account for that. Other cars - we now own a 2010 Subbie Legacy 2.5i, the manual says that the CVT tranny will perform in a certain manner until it reaches real nromal operating temps.
Fish: If I recall, you were very haqppy with the Reflash and the results. Your comments seem to indicate otherwise. Mine is erratic. Today with a cold morning I pushed it, operation was while cold was not too good. But i know that the TCM it is engineered to perform better as it warms. There are measures in the programing to account for that. Other cars - we now own a 2010 Subbie Legacy 2.5i, the manual says that the CVT tranny will perform in a certain manner until it reaches real nromal operating temps.
You obviously didn't read my long earlier post. The lag IS due to "confusion" as to whether to drop one, two or even three gears. But the unusual gearing and the lack of low-end torque conspires to make this a bigger problem than it might otherwise be (in my last long messag I said see FX50 for an example). Add-in a hyper-sensitive throttle mapping and we get what we get. The new mapping will ease the problem, not cure it because it is only addressing a symptom. The cure is impossible without an engine transplant and redesign of the gear ratios.
It obviously has less torque in an absolute sense. The question is torque relative to maximum torque at various rpms and throttle mapping. I will bet it uses the "new" throttle mapping available in the reflash. It may also have a more fuel economy-oriented programming (it better, because if the mileage is roughly the same as the 3.7, what would be the point and if all else was equal, there wouldn't be much difference).
Clue for treating your car nicely: don't push the car when it is still in "cold start" mode. Wait until normal operating temps have been achieved before driving aggressively. The cold start mode is indicated by a faster idle speed and delayed upshifts. For example, the car won't even shift into 7th gear in cold mode (I haven't tested this by driving at extreme speeds, but even at 70 mph it remains in 6th and will stay in 5th at lower speeds). It maintains higher than normal rpms to speed the warm-up of the engine because it reduces overall emissions.
It obviously has less torque in an absolute sense. The question is torque relative to maximum torque at various rpms and throttle mapping. I will bet it uses the "new" throttle mapping available in the reflash. It may also have a more fuel economy-oriented programming (it better, because if the mileage is roughly the same as the 3.7, what would be the point and if all else was equal, there wouldn't be much difference).
*** UPDATE: Well Friday came and went, and although my car is eligible for the ITB10-075 ECU reflash I clued them on to, the dealership had a problem installing it so now I got the loaner till Monday. It's either that they really had a problem or they were super swamped and left me till the end of the day. We'll see..... 

Right from a standstill the acceleration and throttle response is smoother and this continues through the trouble areas of 30-50 MPH which is a huge improvement for local drivers. I have not driven the car on the highway yet since the reflash so I will update once again when I do, but for the next month or so I'm gunna drive it as is before trying the new Hypertech Tune.
Actually, I would like to know what you mean? Is it like when you hit the gas a bit on that speed the revs go up but the car doesnt move and then to tranny hooks up and then it starts accelerating? That's what I get at those speeds and I'm wondering if this is part of the problem you guys are describing and if it would be fixed with update...


