Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G37? Find out the answer in here!

How do we feel about the Nismo Z 350HP?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #1  
Mike S.'s Avatar
Mike S.
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 382
Likes: 3
How do we feel about the Nismo Z 350HP?

350HP/ 276lb-ft of torque, unlike the older uprev motor (I think) this doesn't loose torque for more HP....or..at least the peak torque is up.

I wonder if it takes a big hit at the bottom end?

Nissanusa claims it has a free flow exhaust and "H" pipe...but I'm sure some ecu tunning is involed.

So...kinda cool to see they can bump it up to 350HP and this isn't even with direct injection.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 10:14 AM
  #2  
elite's Avatar
elite
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,066
Likes: 0
From: ۞ DALLAS ۞
I'm thinking I don't care.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 10:59 AM
  #3  
oOmikeyboy's Avatar
oOmikeyboy
Florida G35 Club, Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Yeah the Nismo Z gets some better breathing parts out of the factory, along with nissan engineers that can get the most out of it. Its not unreasonable to see the extra 18hp over the 370z base.

Simple mods like an exhaust, hfc's, have netted the 370z a decent amount of gains, as we've seen so far.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #4  
Roseyhebert's Avatar
Roseyhebert
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
I really like the Nismo Z but I am not sure it would be worth getting rid of my G for it. I want buttons to push and stuff like that on my car. The Z is still just so plain on the inside. That actually makes a difference to me.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #5  
Mike S.'s Avatar
Mike S.
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 382
Likes: 3
I knew the first repsonse was going to be a smart azzz... LOL

I guess I'm not asking if we're dumping our G's to get Z's, I'm thinking about the possiblilty of an easy 20hp gain...which sometimes with aftermarket parts is easier said than done. Esp when dynos sometimes show dissapointing gains from 500 dollar intakes and 700 reflashes.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
Gamedog's Avatar
Gamedog
Sam Rothstein
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,435
Likes: 8
From: Riverside/San Diego, CA
Keep in mind that they're rating the 350 hp at the flywheel, not at the wheels. So gaining 18 horses at the flywheel is definitely do-able with some breathing mods. I mean, if WE are gaining say 17 hp at the wheels off of an intake and exhaust, you add roughly 16% to compensate for drivetrain loss, you're gaining about 19.72 hp at the crank

Yeah, I might be just a little off, but you get the point
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 12:36 PM
  #7  
SilverRSXJezus's Avatar
SilverRSXJezus
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Mike S.
350HP/ 276lb-ft of torque, unlike the older uprev motor (I think) this doesn't loose torque for more HP....or..at least the peak torque is up.

I wonder if it takes a big hit at the bottom end?

Nissanusa claims it has a free flow exhaust and "H" pipe...but I'm sure some ecu tunning is involed.

So...kinda cool to see they can bump it up to 350HP and this isn't even with direct injection.

Unless you have seen a dyno, I'm willing to bet that it does lose some lower end torque for high end power. Peak torque numbers won't be related to any low end RPM losses as it will generally be located around the mid to higher RPMs.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #8  
christian655321's Avatar
christian655321
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 2
perhaps the changed the plenum a little, knows.. doesnt matter though go FI and you dont have to worrd about it anymore..
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #9  
Mike S.'s Avatar
Mike S.
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 382
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Gamedog
Keep in mind that they're rating the 350 hp at the flywheel, not at the wheels. So gaining 18 horses at the flywheel is definitely do-able with some breathing mods. I mean, if WE are gaining say 17 hp at the wheels off of an intake and exhaust, you add roughly 16% to compensate for drivetrain loss, you're gaining about 19.72 hp at the crank

Yeah, I might be just a little off, but you get the point
I'm not being a jerk when I say this....but are people gaining 17 or so HP at the wheels with intakes and exhausts?

I thought the stock intake was supposed to be left alone...that is flows fine. This gain is for coupes I would imagine but the seadan VQ37 is basically identical.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 02:15 PM
  #10  
xyz's Avatar
xyz
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Mike S.
I'm not being a jerk when I say this....but are people gaining 17 or so HP at the wheels with intakes and exhausts?

I thought the stock intake was supposed to be left alone...that is flows fine. This gain is for coupes I would imagine but the seadan VQ37 is basically identical.
Let's say it is just the cat-back exhaust, and we have seen 10~13 whp from that on the G37s. So that is prob around 13~16 hp at the flywheel, not that far off from the 18 the 370z nismo's getting.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #11  
DCook42's Avatar
DCook42
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut/NY
I was seriously considering the Nismo 350Z ('08) when I decided to go with the G37. I *loved* the back end of that car, the wheels, the low profile and body styling... the deal breaker for me was that when you sat in the car and looked back, all you saw was a plastic wall and the rear window. I know the G37 doesn't have much of a back seat, but it's enough to cram a couple females back there!
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #12  
ucla bruin's Avatar
ucla bruin
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 3
From: Orange County
Originally Posted by Mike S.
I'm not being a jerk when I say this....but are people gaining 17 or so HP at the wheels with intakes and exhausts?

I thought the stock intake was supposed to be left alone...that is flows fine. This gain is for coupes I would imagine but the seadan VQ37 is basically identical.

I gained +16 to +19 at the wheels with just an intake.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #13  
Staples's Avatar
Staples
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 5
From: Bel Air, MD
Originally Posted by Mike S.
I'm not being a jerk when I say this....but are people gaining 17 or so HP at the wheels with intakes and exhausts?

I thought the stock intake was supposed to be left alone...that is flows fine. This gain is for coupes I would imagine but the seadan VQ37 is basically identical.
The stock intakes do flow well, but there's always room for improvement over OEM. Most intakes do improve overall power. When we say "lose" power (mainly torque), we're referencing two companies known to do that: The old Fujita SRI, and JWT Pops. Of course with a proper tune you'll see more power from these two then stock intakes.

Fujita has since come out with newer short ram intakes that seem to flow a lot better then their first setup a year ago.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #14  
dannbla's Avatar
dannbla
LA G Club
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
From: L.A. Cali
which intakes do you have again?




Originally Posted by ucla bruin
I gained +16 to +19 at the wheels with just an intake.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 09:09 PM
  #15  
ucla bruin's Avatar
ucla bruin
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 3
From: Orange County
Injen's CAI, there's a review thread on it.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 PM.