What vehicle will be a worthy replacement for your sedan when it is time?
I find it interesting that many of you are not biased to RWD cars after owning the G. I've driven mainly Euros for about 18 years until buying my G, but part of the reason for buying it was the RWD. I see a lot of FWD cars being considered for the next one. Not surprised to see AWD. I personally just DO NOT like driving a "performance oriented" FWD car. Performance and FWD do not go together imo
I agree. I keep trying to talk myself into a newer Mustang or Camaro as the performance is there, but they are so crude inside like the C6 Z06's I was considering.
Boss 302- yes. Boss 302 Leguna Seca I was talking about were all over $50k No thanks. A new Camaro SS 1LE will run circles around it and actually has independent rear suspension.
Boss 302- yes. Boss 302 Leguna Seca I was talking about were all over $50k No thanks. A new Camaro SS 1LE will run circles around it and actually has independent rear suspension.
Throw fatter tires on it and it matches the 1 LE. You basically have a Leguna Seca with just beefing up the tires, suspension and a cage. 302 threw it down at Leguna Seca. As for 00-60 the Solid rear axle will plant and rip a lot better than the Independent. So 1/4 is a toss up.
Just playing Devil's advocate here but I think a modified, standard, Boss 302 will be quite a lot of fun and put up a hell of a fight against a 1LE.
6th Gen is fantastic looking though. Enormous improvement over the 5th gen. 1 LE package is very affordable too. $6,500 extra in goodies for electronic LSD, Fat custom super stickies, Brembos, beefed up cooling, short throw shifter, Recaros and more?
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
I know virtually nothing about the Elise, however if its advice you're looking for from people that share some (or most) of your automotive values, I suspect the Lotus would make you insanely happy on track days, and the occasional barnstorming weekend event.
But that still leaves (no pun) 99.9% of your drive-time with a daily driver, and for that you want something with heft and comfort and fun... which I suspect the Leaf would disappoint. It seems disposable; more akin to a tool than a car. In other words, don't sacrifice the rewards of daily driving something you enjoy just to support an occasional toy.
That's my thinking. If you can afford to enjoy your DD, then don't give it up.
Buy the Lotus, keep the G... and stop modifying it for the track.
But that still leaves (no pun) 99.9% of your drive-time with a daily driver, and for that you want something with heft and comfort and fun... which I suspect the Leaf would disappoint. It seems disposable; more akin to a tool than a car. In other words, don't sacrifice the rewards of daily driving something you enjoy just to support an occasional toy.
That's my thinking. If you can afford to enjoy your DD, then don't give it up.
Buy the Lotus, keep the G... and stop modifying it for the track.
However, that brings up a good point and what I ran into with my previous Leaf when I had an E46 M3. I agree that it is more fun to have a dual purpose daily driver that can be fun any time you want to step on the gas as opposed to having 2 different cars. The other reason I was not a fan of having 2 cars just for me was that my old house did not have enough room for all the cars. The new house has a much larger garage so that is no longer a problem.
One other note on the Elise. I've been a big fan since they came out in the late 90's, I believe. Everything I've ever read on them says that they're tiny inside though. Not sure how big you are, but I think I remember it's like a 5'10" and under and fit-ish type of car. I'm 6'2+ so that's one I'll always just have to admire from afar.
Regarding the newer mustangs, there are a few parts of the interior that do look absolutely cheap. Overall, I would say it's not bad though. The seats on my wife's 2017 GT premium are super comfy and look nice and the SYNC infotainment/nav system connectivity and functionality is light years ahead of what's in my G. It's really intuitive and works flawlessly.
Regarding the newer mustangs, there are a few parts of the interior that do look absolutely cheap. Overall, I would say it's not bad though. The seats on my wife's 2017 GT premium are super comfy and look nice and the SYNC infotainment/nav system connectivity and functionality is light years ahead of what's in my G. It's really intuitive and works flawlessly.
Seca just gains Recaros and a Torsen limited-slip rear differential. Both are available in the normal(?) Boss 302. Rear seats removed and a cage. Suspension is upgraded which you can do yourself. Not really a whole lot separating the two.
Throw fatter tires on it and it matches the 1 LE. You basically have a Leguna Seca with just beefing up the tires, suspension and a cage. 302 threw it down at Leguna Seca. As for 00-60 the Solid rear axle will plant and rip a lot better than the Independent. So 1/4 is a toss up.
Just playing Devil's advocate here but I think a modified, standard, Boss 302 will be quite a lot of fun and put up a hell of a fight against a 1LE.
6th Gen is fantastic looking though. Enormous improvement over the 5th gen. 1 LE package is very affordable too. $6,500 extra in goodies for electronic LSD, Fat custom super stickies, Brembos, beefed up cooling, short throw shifter, Recaros and more?
Throw fatter tires on it and it matches the 1 LE. You basically have a Leguna Seca with just beefing up the tires, suspension and a cage. 302 threw it down at Leguna Seca. As for 00-60 the Solid rear axle will plant and rip a lot better than the Independent. So 1/4 is a toss up.
Just playing Devil's advocate here but I think a modified, standard, Boss 302 will be quite a lot of fun and put up a hell of a fight against a 1LE.
6th Gen is fantastic looking though. Enormous improvement over the 5th gen. 1 LE package is very affordable too. $6,500 extra in goodies for electronic LSD, Fat custom super stickies, Brembos, beefed up cooling, short throw shifter, Recaros and more?
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Those are both fun cars on the street and I would add the VW GTI and the new Civic Type R to that list. But as you found out racing, physics will give any FWD car limitations on a track compared to AWD and RWD. When you try to get the front tires to do all of the steering and acceleration they will get overworked much earlier.
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Those are both fun cars on the street and I would add the VW GTI and the new Civic Type R to that list. But as you found out racing, physics will give any FWD car limitations on a track compared to AWD and RWD. When you try to get the front tires to do all of the steering and acceleration they will get overworked much earlier.
As with anything, it all comes down to preference. My autotragic G will probably never see any track time but I personally prefer the overall feel of RWD car characteristics. I like a rear biased AWD car too (Audi)
Like anything it depends... I'd take something like an ITR over a Buick Roadmaster any day
Back in the day I had an H22 swapped Honda Accord with a Quaife differential.... that thing used to actually torque steer into the corner under power. It was unreal. With all the ducks in a row (mechanical LSD, good tires, good suspension design, reasonable power) FWD can be great. Problem is there aren't too many FWD cars with all their ducks in a row. And I'd be weary to gamble on buying a FWD car to try to re-engineer the drivetrain and suspension.
Back in the day I had an H22 swapped Honda Accord with a Quaife differential.... that thing used to actually torque steer into the corner under power. It was unreal. With all the ducks in a row (mechanical LSD, good tires, good suspension design, reasonable power) FWD can be great. Problem is there aren't too many FWD cars with all their ducks in a row. And I'd be weary to gamble on buying a FWD car to try to re-engineer the drivetrain and suspension.
The Torque steer was a big deal with the MS3 and the Quaife differential apparently made it non-existent. Need everything working in unison, like you mentioned, but the amount of support is only there for a select few models.
I'm bias now. After driving both, the RWD is what I prefer over FWD. If I ever considered FWD again it would have to be modeled after Mazda's approach to the MS3. Great performance, practicality, reliability, decent handling, good aftermarket but most importantly - very affordable.
Feels like too many cars that are FWD with any sort of performance over 200hp have huge mark ups. Fiesta and Focus ST might be the only ones that fit the bill but compared to a Mazda Speed it's lacking.
I'm bias now. After driving both, the RWD is what I prefer over FWD. If I ever considered FWD again it would have to be modeled after Mazda's approach to the MS3. Great performance, practicality, reliability, decent handling, good aftermarket but most importantly - very affordable.
Feels like too many cars that are FWD with any sort of performance over 200hp have huge mark ups. Fiesta and Focus ST might be the only ones that fit the bill but compared to a Mazda Speed it's lacking.
I've yet to experience a FWD car that didn't have torque steer while powering into a corner. Fighting the wheel while a FWD car spins the tires just feels cheap, whereas a RWD car getting loose in the same way doesn't







