G37 Sedan

did a few timed 0-60 times and not liking what is got

Old Jan 25, 2017 | 07:14 AM
  #16  
RMB5190's Avatar
RMB5190
Super Moderator
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 504
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by TheLocNar
Don't waste time with the torque app. Get to a drag strip.
This is really the best way to do it. Always going to be a discrepancy when timing yourself and having others do it; given all the different reaction times as to when people actually start the clock.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2017 | 07:39 AM
  #17  
Rochester's Avatar
Rochester
Administrator
15 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,859
Likes: 5,150
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by si_driver
Most of the runs I had were in the 6.4 second range, some even as slow as 7. Had to work the car hard to get to 5.9 and couldn't do anything less no matter what I tried.
So you're faster than a 1982 Corvette. Yes!

did a few timed 0-60 times and not liking what is got-leailo6.jpg

Coincidentally, so is my wife's 9 year old Honda CR-V.

But seriously, when you're on the street, all that matters is the drive, not the speed. You've a great car, enjoy it.

Last edited by Rochester; Jan 25, 2017 at 08:45 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 07:56 PM
  #18  
G37sPhoton's Avatar
G37sPhoton
Registered Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 491
Likes: 56
From: Tampa bay
^^^ this...as i get older/mature etc or whatever ...i realize power and speed are great but they have their place, and normally not on the streets. i mean having the extra hp is great for passing, merging and a few other scenarios when alone etc, but for the most part, 0-60 just gonna get you in trouble, in more ways than one. enjoy the car
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2017 | 12:53 AM
  #19  
davison0976's Avatar
davison0976
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 65
Likes: 48
From: Northern, NJ
Originally Posted by si_driver
No, I did not try turning TC off. The road was a little wet. Will have to try that next time.
When snow covers the road I get 10.3s, but I am not going to mention that I was trying 0-60 on a snowy road, because then there is no drama. Are you somehow suffering from attention deficit and need approval or something?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2017 | 01:35 AM
  #20  
JSolo's Avatar
JSolo
Just say no!!!!!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 594
From: People's Republic of IL
Get a bike... 0-60 times not even worth mentioning (3s or less), 1/4 in 10-11s stock.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2017 | 06:21 PM
  #21  
mjnoles1's Avatar
mjnoles1
Registered Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
I don't care what the numbers say, this is not a fast car. Feels a lot slower than what you would expect from the 0-60 the magazines got. From reading the forum, it seems the low end torque is the reason for such a slow feeling.

My mom used to have a 335i convertible and that thing felt like a rocket compared to this.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2017 | 07:18 AM
  #22  
RMB5190's Avatar
RMB5190
Super Moderator
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 504
From: Maryland
I think that was kinda the point with VVEL...it was meant for smooth power delivery; not a neck snapper. Probably why you felt like the 335 was that much quicker. When that turbo kicks in it's a different animal. I feel like NA engines are like that for the most part - smoother power delivery that is.

Infiniti has to appeal to the masses. So a neck snapping turbo VQ probably wasn't their bread and butter when they released the G (I'm aware they have one now). It doesn't exactly have the fanboy club BMW does where quality products from the past are what people remember. BMW makes a great performing vehicle but it's kind of hilarious to see people say "Just get a BMW and get rid of it before the warranty expires." I mean, really? If that's the pinnacle of German engineering...
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2017 | 07:25 AM
  #23  
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 528
From: Charlotte, NC
The 335 has a lot more low-mid range torque than our cars.

My neighbor has a 335 coupe, and a co worker has a 335 sedan, both autos, both stock, my G pulls them both
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2017 | 07:36 AM
  #24  
Rochester's Avatar
Rochester
Administrator
15 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,859
Likes: 5,150
From: Rochester, NY
Insofar as how fast a car "feels", the 6MT is a far more engaging experience. And the VQ37HR may run rough compared to other engines, but its power curve is relatively flat, meaning it can be deceptively fast.

My previous car was a 5.5 Gen Maxima 6MT. The VQ35DE in that car was much less the powerplant than what's in my G, and yet... in the overlapping period between the two cars, it *felt* like that old FWD Maxima was faster. (It was certainly less heavy )

Last edited by Rochester; Feb 1, 2017 at 08:02 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 10:00 AM
  #25  
IracknBack's Avatar
IracknBack
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 500
Likes: 59
From: Kitsap County, WA
LOL at the guy claiming 4.8 - 4.9 unless he is FI.


an X is always going to be slower than a true S model. it's heavier and without a good transmission (DCT) the 6MT will be the better option. and as someone else said, aftermarket wheels, gas in the tank, tire pressure, elevation, temperature outside, windspeed/direction can all effect the claimed 5.1 of the 6MT vehicle tested versus what you were doing.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 10:43 AM
  #26  
RMB5190's Avatar
RMB5190
Super Moderator
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 504
From: Maryland
Reaction time may cause a variety of results but here is my video. Speedo starts very shortly after video starts and ends shortly after crossing 60.

https://youtu.be/qQ4smcQcbM8

This was done on a "straight" away a short distance from my home. Reaction time will cause varying results. I'll get 4.9-5.3 because my reaction will vary but the point I was trying to get across was that the car is quicker than the times OP was posting. I'm aware outside elements and elevation could have an effect on time - mentioned this in my 1st post. Shot this video for fun but I'll bring my level, barometer and gauges to do a full calibration next time...

2/3 Edit: Also since I'm feeling argumentative if someone wants to dispute my claim ...

http://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle...-60-mph-times/

If you scroll down to the G37 times it seems my time wasn't that far-fetched.

Last edited by RMB5190; Feb 3, 2017 at 10:28 AM.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.