G37 Sedan

Infiniti High Performance G - What Top 5 things would you want?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2016 | 11:39 PM
  #31  
Epiphany's Avatar
Epiphany
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 244
From: Alberta
Anyone who lives at altitude will tell you that turbo>NA. I lose something like 10% of power being NA, people on here will spend thousands to gain 30hp, and I lose that much just for where I live.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2016 | 11:46 PM
  #32  
4doorfury's Avatar
4doorfury
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 680
Likes: 75
From: Tampa, FL
Florida ftw
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2016 | 11:56 PM
  #33  
Upscale Speed's Avatar
Upscale Speed
Premier Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 923
Likes: 120
From: Springvale, ME
OK so m0re realistically would be a 5.6L V8 G Coupe at 3600lbs with VLSD, DCT, forged 20's, sport suspension with a compliant chassis and launch control. All for $50k
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2016 | 12:08 AM
  #34  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,876
Likes: 4,950
Originally Posted by Upscale Speed
OK so m0re realistically would be a 5.6L V8 G Coupe at 3600lbs with VLSD, DCT, forged 20's, sport suspension with a compliant chassis and launch control. All for $50k
Well you've sold me, where do I sign???
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2016 | 08:28 AM
  #35  
4doorfury's Avatar
4doorfury
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 680
Likes: 75
From: Tampa, FL
Lets lose the oem type lsd and go with a quiafe or similar instead then I would say it is money.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2016 | 11:38 AM
  #36  
4DRZ's Avatar
4DRZ
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Originally Posted by Mkhlmnn
If Infiniti would have made a IS-F,M3, or C63 competitor out of the G (similar to the Eau Rouge concept but out of the G platform like they should have. What are the Top 3 changes you think it would have needed to compete

If only the G came from the factory a bit more aggressive with a bit more power it would be perfect, we can only dream though
4doorfury, as you can see from the original post above, clearly the point of this thread IS about changes we would like to have seen from Infiniti. Not sure why you are still trying to argue this point.

Originally Posted by 4doorfury
I still have to argue that it isn't the point. We are not talking production car here. The title of the thread is top 5 things you would want lol. I am stating if infiniti upped the size of the turbos they chose then the motor could in essence rev out higher. I assure you this new 3.0 tt won't be able to make much more peak power than it does factory because the turbos are probably right at peak efficiency.
Another example of factory cars having a higher redline is the Infiniti G/Q itself. My N/A G37 makes max hp at 7,000rpm. The new Q50 Red Sport 400 with twin turbos makes max hp at 6,400rpm.

I don't dislike turbos. In fact, my original suggestion was to have the car be turbo since it is easier/cheaper to tune a turbo car for more hp than replace a ton of parts on an N/A car. I simply mentioned that I liked the higher redline I have in my G37S than all my previous turbo cars.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2016 | 01:44 PM
  #37  
4doorfury's Avatar
4doorfury
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 680
Likes: 75
From: Tampa, FL
You simply said having a higher redline than turbo cars is nice...

That is a generic statement that I was commenting on saying that just because a car has a turbo doesn't mean it can't rev high.

I don't get what point you are trying to argue otherwise. My assumption is we are just miscommunicating due to this being via text and not an in person conversation.

And yes the original post referenced a few production cars and what infiniti would have needed to do to keep up so yes we are stating things that we would have needed to have changed to the G.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2016 | 02:27 PM
  #38  
4DRZ's Avatar
4DRZ
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Originally Posted by 4doorfury
You simply said having a higher redline than turbo cars is nice...

That is a generic statement that I was commenting on saying that just because a car has a turbo doesn't mean it can't rev high.

I don't get what point you are trying to argue otherwise. My assumption is we are just miscommunicating due to this being via text and not an in person conversation.

And yes the original post referenced a few production cars and what infiniti would have needed to do to keep up so yes we are stating things that we would have needed to have changed to the G.
My point since my first post that you decided to argue with me about is that the post is about what changes we want to see Infiniti make to the car from the factory to compete with more sports luxury sedans. Thank you for finally changing your mind and agreeing with me on this in your last post.

The other point I was trying to make is that since this post is about changes we want to see Infiniti make on the car from the factory- performance factory turbo cars typically have lower redlines and make peak power lower than performance factory N/A cars. I think I have provided plenty of examples of this so let's just move on.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2016 | 03:05 PM
  #39  
4doorfury's Avatar
4doorfury
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 680
Likes: 75
From: Tampa, FL
Lol you are too funny. Relax man. As I just said I wasn't really arguing with you I was saying you were taking this the wrong way and it was just miscommunication due to it being via text where emotion is more difficult to present. The ONLY point I was trying to get across is that infiniti could turbo the car and still retain the high redline you specifically enjoy. On that note, if you don't comprehend this, I am done discussing the topic.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2016 | 03:33 PM
  #40  
4DRZ's Avatar
4DRZ
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 697
From: Appleton, WI
Originally Posted by 4doorfury
Lol you are too funny. Relax man. As I just said I wasn't really arguing with you I was saying you were taking this the wrong way and it was just miscommunication due to it being via text where emotion is more difficult to present. The ONLY point I was trying to get across is that infiniti could turbo the car and still retain the high redline you specifically enjoy. On that note, if you don't comprehend this, I am done discussing the topic.
I completely understand your point about the possibilities of higher rpm turbo applications. I wish you would understand my point about the realities of manufacturers producing cars with higher redlines on N/A cars compared to turbo cars. Apparently that is not going to happen, so again, let's move on.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2016 | 12:15 AM
  #41  
ZahyMatar's Avatar
ZahyMatar
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 341
From: Franklin Park, NJ
Originally Posted by Upscale Speed
OK so m0re realistically would be a 5.6L V8 G Coupe at 3600lbs with VLSD, DCT, forged 20's, sport suspension with a compliant chassis and launch control. All for $50k
VLSD? Why not a mechanical LSD?
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 PM.