Q50 Eau Rouge
#76
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
It is tough to speculate on where this car will slot with the points that were brought up. The likely ≈ 70k price point makes it a bad contender to be harboring a GT-R drive train. It seems unlikely to be a halo car for Infiniti at that price point. It seems more plausible that it will be an M3/M4 fighter.
But GT-R parts.. well, one can dream right?
But GT-R parts.. well, one can dream right?
#77
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
I think it will be more than a simple 3.7L engine. If you look at the official site, the particles form a much larger engine, it doesn't look like a 3.7. I have been reading some reports that its a GTR variant with a hybrid system. Infiniti has been talking about that platform for a long time, especially when you consider the F1 partnership they wouldnt just put a 3.7L NA that's been used for the last 10 years.
The only thing that might be a big downer is the fact that they are putting it into a sedan.
The only thing that might be a big downer is the fact that they are putting it into a sedan.
#79
Registered Member
Sorry, for $90K I would not be buying a Q50. Just like the $50K loaded priced for a Q50 opens up a whole other list of options, $90K opens up an even bigger list. And on that list are proven performers, not a new platform that doesnt seem to be as "sporty" as the platform it replaced.
And wouldnt it be funny if the new drivetrain they bring is a result of their co-op with Mercedes? What if they use the exact same engine thats in the CLA45? its almost a 30HP bump, and presumably better mpg since its a 4 banger. Everyone angry that they re-used the 3.7L should be happy, right?
Im as big an Infiniti fan as a lot of people on this forum, but it feels like they are trying to "play with the big boys" while bringing a Q50 to a gun fight.
And wouldnt it be funny if the new drivetrain they bring is a result of their co-op with Mercedes? What if they use the exact same engine thats in the CLA45? its almost a 30HP bump, and presumably better mpg since its a 4 banger. Everyone angry that they re-used the 3.7L should be happy, right?
Im as big an Infiniti fan as a lot of people on this forum, but it feels like they are trying to "play with the big boys" while bringing a Q50 to a gun fight.
What would really REALLY be awesome, is if they went ***** to the wall with this and used TWO CLA45 engines. 4.0L V8 quad-turbo with 700 hp. Would be very very awesome as a technical showcase. Even more nuts would be if they developed a shortened W8TT. Only 1 car has had the W8 configuration, and it was a VW. I still believe the W configuration is technically superior to traditional V's. shorter case means that it can be places further into the car, making the center of gravity closer to the middle, which would definitely aid in handling.
It is tough to speculate on where this car will slot with the points that were brought up. The likely ≈ 70k price point makes it a bad contender to be harboring a GT-R drive train. It seems unlikely to be a halo car for Infiniti at that price point. It seems more plausible that it will be an M3/M4 fighter.
But GT-R parts.. well, one can dream right?
But GT-R parts.. well, one can dream right?
#80
A quarter past stripped
If indeed it has a price tag of $70K-$90K then the market will be small. Most who can afford a vehicle that costly would more then likely opt for an AMG or M series. Infiniti has a great ratio between performance and cost. (primary reason I purchased one) To move farther away from that market would likely hurt sales. IMO..... It sure is a sharp looking car from these teasers though.
#81
Registered Member
Another thing about crossing markets is, IMO, most out there with $70K+ to spend on a car won't even consider (or at least not very seriously consider) a Japanese marque (a "badged up" Nissan). I've heard from more than a few guys with nice car collections that regardless of performance, they wouldn't drive a GTR due to the emblem on the back.
A big part about these high expense auto purchases is the prestige and status that accompany them (not to mention brand loyalty, especially with ///M and AMG models), and I don't think Infinti really has much clout in this regard unless they produce something truly exceptional (track record is not indicative of this, but you never know)
Personally an intriguing move would be development of a lower displacement V6 (~3.0) with FI, alongside the suspension and brake upgrades (throw an MT in there) and keep it well south of $60K (mind you I think the Q50S Hybrid is grossly overpriced at close to $50K without options)
A big part about these high expense auto purchases is the prestige and status that accompany them (not to mention brand loyalty, especially with ///M and AMG models), and I don't think Infinti really has much clout in this regard unless they produce something truly exceptional (track record is not indicative of this, but you never know)
Personally an intriguing move would be development of a lower displacement V6 (~3.0) with FI, alongside the suspension and brake upgrades (throw an MT in there) and keep it well south of $60K (mind you I think the Q50S Hybrid is grossly overpriced at close to $50K without options)
#82
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
Another point in favor of this going to a hybrid setup is the CO2 emissions levels that are set to kick in starting in 2015 at 130 grams per kilometer, and down to 95 grams in 2020. As of 2011 figures, the VR38DETT emits 279 grams of CO2 per kilometer. Given that Infiniti is wanting to vastly expand into Europe, the case weakens for the VR38, much to our disappointment if they're going to be able to maintain a fleet average of 130 grams or better.
Maybe a VR30DETT with a hybrid setup. The GT-R would probably have to follow suit. The best thing so far to support something with serious grunt under the hood is those brakes. Guess we'll know more in about a week.
Maybe a VR30DETT with a hybrid setup. The GT-R would probably have to follow suit. The best thing so far to support something with serious grunt under the hood is those brakes. Guess we'll know more in about a week.
#84
Registered Member
Personally an intriguing move would be development of a lower displacement V6 (~3.0) with FI, alongside the suspension and brake upgrades (throw an MT in there) and keep it well south of $60K (mind you I think the Q50S Hybrid is grossly overpriced at close to $50K without options)
Another point in favor of this going to a hybrid setup is the CO2 emissions levels that are set to kick in starting in 2015 at 130 grams per kilometer, and down to 95 grams in 2020. As of 2011 figures, the VR38DETT emits 279 grams of CO2 per kilometer. Given that Infiniti is wanting to vastly expand into Europe, the case weakens for the VR38, much to our disappointment if they're going to be able to maintain a fleet average of 130 grams or better.
Maybe a VR30DETT with a hybrid setup. The GT-R would probably have to follow suit. The best thing so far to support something with serious grunt under the hood is those brakes. Guess we'll know more in about a week.
Maybe a VR30DETT with a hybrid setup. The GT-R would probably have to follow suit. The best thing so far to support something with serious grunt under the hood is those brakes. Guess we'll know more in about a week.
#86
Registered Member
Neither do I, which makes me think this endeavor has limited potential. Either Nissan continues on its path like you said, or it releases something with a tiny market. I think it's clear what the accountants at Nissan would prefer, but ya never know
#87
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
A Q50S AWD Hybrid is clocking in at $56k loaded already so I don't see any room for this car. Crazjayz you make a lot of excellent points and I'm thinking $70k minimum is what we can expect for this car.
With the R36 going to a hybrid setup, perhaps Nissan is looking to split development costs. To play devil's advocate, from what I've seen on the NATGROC forums, the R36 development does not appear to be that far along.
Given that the 2015 GT-R and Nismo editions have received revised headlights and tail lights, it's possible they will stick around another two to three years. Fascia changes are not typically utilized for a single model year-- The notable exception in recent memory being the M35 and M45 front fascia changes for the 2010 model year.
Another possible option is keeping the existing VQ35VHR + Hybrid and throwing a pair of snails on it. The development costs wouldn't be too bad and they could keep it in the $65-70k price point. They would probably need to beef up the bottom end of the engine slightly, although that would not be necessarily essential as the VQ blocks can handle 500 horsepower relatively easily. The performance would far exceed the M3/M4, C63 so they would still have a value proposition at that price point.
De Nysschen mentioned a 550 hp car over the summer which could still be positioned above this car as an M/Q70 high performance version.
Ok, all the speculation is starting to drive me nuts! LOL. It's a love/hate relationship for me right now that rides a narrow line of being fun and insane at the same time because I'm just a lowly enthusiast. At this point, there are several ways it could go.
With the R36 going to a hybrid setup, perhaps Nissan is looking to split development costs. To play devil's advocate, from what I've seen on the NATGROC forums, the R36 development does not appear to be that far along.
Given that the 2015 GT-R and Nismo editions have received revised headlights and tail lights, it's possible they will stick around another two to three years. Fascia changes are not typically utilized for a single model year-- The notable exception in recent memory being the M35 and M45 front fascia changes for the 2010 model year.
Another possible option is keeping the existing VQ35VHR + Hybrid and throwing a pair of snails on it. The development costs wouldn't be too bad and they could keep it in the $65-70k price point. They would probably need to beef up the bottom end of the engine slightly, although that would not be necessarily essential as the VQ blocks can handle 500 horsepower relatively easily. The performance would far exceed the M3/M4, C63 so they would still have a value proposition at that price point.
De Nysschen mentioned a 550 hp car over the summer which could still be positioned above this car as an M/Q70 high performance version.
Ok, all the speculation is starting to drive me nuts! LOL. It's a love/hate relationship for me right now that rides a narrow line of being fun and insane at the same time because I'm just a lowly enthusiast. At this point, there are several ways it could go.
#88
The Eau Rouge could have a blown 3.7 or 3.5(hybrid?) or maybe a detuned version of the GTR engine. Most likely though will be an all new 3.0 liter twin turbo V6 that DeNysschen hinted at in one of his earlier interviews where he was defending the whole name change thing. This engine will also show up in the Q60 coupe as well as the (Q70) M replacement, so it needs to be smaller and lighter while matching or exceeding the M56's V8 (420hp & 417lb-ft.), and offer more torque while getting noticeably better fuel economy. It should be comparable in power and specs to the M3 for a bit less money.
#89
The Eau Rouge could have a blown 3.7 or 3.5(hybrid?) or maybe a detuned version of the GTR engine. Most likely though will be an all new 3.0 liter twin turbo V6 that DeNysschen hinted at in one of his earlier interviews where he was defending the whole name change thing. This engine will also show up in the Q60 coupe as well as the (Q70) M replacement, so it needs to be smaller and lighter while matching or exceeding the M56's V8 (420hp & 417lb-ft.), and offer more torque while getting noticeably better fuel economy. It should be comparable in power and specs to the M3 for a bit less money.