Saw my first Q50 today
as said before, no advancement in performance specs (engine & drivetrain & suspension) - aside from a Hybrid - is a real disappointment. add that to the fact that the 6MT is dropped (for now) and run-flats...not good. infiniti may gain new customers looking for the new styling & tech stuff, but infiniti will lose a share of existing customers unless they step up with meaningful driver-oriented improvements.
hahah I am there with you, as much as I love the new car (see my review in this section as I got to drive it) the lack of a 6mt will take me out of it until they add it back in. But the quality and tech is worth the money
EDIT: Scratch that. I'm wrong. The Sport AWD is 3849 lbs. Mind made a leap looking at the charts. But overall it still stands that the chassis is lighter.
^ this is getting really old. Infiniti debuted the grille first. Even still, I don't see Lexus in the front. And until the spindle grill, WTH did a Lexus look like anyway? There was never distinct Lexus look.
Last edited by nisslover; Apr 30, 2013 at 02:38 AM.
by ~ 30-40lbs? That is almost the same as taking the spare tire out of my G. They should have at least dropped close to 100lbs and give the vq a bit more low end grunt in order to run with the new 335i. That thing is running 4.6-4.8 in 60 runs..
"WTH did a Lexus look like anyway? "
A Camry!
Those seeking the MT option may have to seek elsewhere if the new demographic is what it appears to be - higher end/more luxury. The Q looks to be a great car from what little we've seen so far, but it might not be the car for many of us depending on the price point and options list. I understand wanting to to be a "true" competitor, but be careful what you wish for. Part of the appeal of Infinity in general has been "value" when compared to the establishment. As mentioned earlier, the Q50 AWD Sport is spot on the price of an S4 Prestige. That badge, and the associated pedigree, means a LOT to buyers in this price range.
Regardless, choice is good, and with 4 kids getting larger everyday and all their associated stuff, it my be irrelevant for me moving forward. I've actually started looking at crew cab trucks
Now THAT is scary....
A Camry!
Those seeking the MT option may have to seek elsewhere if the new demographic is what it appears to be - higher end/more luxury. The Q looks to be a great car from what little we've seen so far, but it might not be the car for many of us depending on the price point and options list. I understand wanting to to be a "true" competitor, but be careful what you wish for. Part of the appeal of Infinity in general has been "value" when compared to the establishment. As mentioned earlier, the Q50 AWD Sport is spot on the price of an S4 Prestige. That badge, and the associated pedigree, means a LOT to buyers in this price range.
Regardless, choice is good, and with 4 kids getting larger everyday and all their associated stuff, it my be irrelevant for me moving forward. I've actually started looking at crew cab trucks
Now THAT is scary....
this vehicle is definitely better than the m, more luxurious, almost as spacious, faster and better mpg. It will interesting to see what happens with the M now that the Q is up in the same price range area
There are more models for the Q50:
Q50: 3574
Q50 Premium: 3611
Q50 Sport: 3675
Q50 AWD: 3748
Q50 AWD Premium: 3787
Q50 AWD Sport: 3849
G37 Journey: 3628
G37x AWD: 3822
G37 6MT Sport: 3709
IMO the best comparison is:
Q50 Premium: 3611
G37 Journey: 3628
Q50 AWD Premium: 3787
G37x AWD: 3822
So, the Q50 is a bit inherently lighter.
, and even then the G37 will generally catch the 335i by 125 mph or so. Base Journey 7AT vs. a 335i IMO is a tossup. IMO the gearing of the G is off. The key to more accel is getting power down better; there's already quite a bit of it.
7AT: 3rd is a bit too long and 4th is way too long. Shorten 5th and 6th a bit.
6MT: too long all around. Each gear should be shorter by 10-15%. That will go a fai
In the mag comparisons of the 6MT models
, and even then the G37 will generally catch the 335i by 125 mph or so. Base Journey 7AT vs. a 335i IMO is a tossup.
IMO the gearing of the G is off. The key to more accel is getting power down better; there's already quite a bit of it.
7AT: 3rd is a bit too long and 4th is way too long. Shorten 5th and 6th a bit.
6MT: too long all around. Each gear should be shorter by 10-15%. That will go a fai
, and even then the G37 will generally catch the 335i by 125 mph or so. Base Journey 7AT vs. a 335i IMO is a tossup. IMO the gearing of the G is off. The key to more accel is getting power down better; there's already quite a bit of it.
7AT: 3rd is a bit too long and 4th is way too long. Shorten 5th and 6th a bit.
6MT: too long all around. Each gear should be shorter by 10-15%. That will go a fai
the G37 gearing is aiming toward fuel economy. by shorten it you are looking to take 10-15% hit on MPG. and that will hit the sales numbers quite a bit.







)