Q50 Pre-Order Pricing Announced
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 107
Likes: 1
Guys, the only thing that is not included in the destination fee and if a dealer charges a doc fee, some do some don't.
If anyone is getting a quote for more than MSRP, hmu and let me see what I can do for you. No commitmen. Keep in mind that I am in the middle of the cournty and 98% of my inventory will be awd.
If anyone is getting a quote for more than MSRP, hmu and let me see what I can do for you. No commitmen. Keep in mind that I am in the middle of the cournty and 98% of my inventory will be awd.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 248
Likes: 6
It's splitting hairs between the G37 and the 328i. The 328i has more low-end torque and it's lighter, so it feels stronger and more agile on public roads. On the race track, the G37 wins thanks to its better performance at high RPMs.
Like I said, neither one of those cars gives you that awesome power feel that you get with somewhat higher-end cars like the S4/S5/335i. In particular, the quattro grip + low-end torque of the Audis result in amazing acceleration with great traction - just no comparison between my G37 and my S5 in that area.
The Q50 with the VQ37VHR should perform similarly to the G37 - why would it be any different? People have been hopeful for an improvement from the hybrid, but weight is the problem with that one.
In my view, Nissan has been neglecting engine development for a while, so they've fallen behind in introducing new technology in mass-produced engines. This is why they need to get an engine from Mercedes for the Q50. They've also fallen behind in transmissions (other than CVT). Hopefully, the new Jatco 8-speed will correct that.
Like I said, neither one of those cars gives you that awesome power feel that you get with somewhat higher-end cars like the S4/S5/335i. In particular, the quattro grip + low-end torque of the Audis result in amazing acceleration with great traction - just no comparison between my G37 and my S5 in that area.
The Q50 with the VQ37VHR should perform similarly to the G37 - why would it be any different? People have been hopeful for an improvement from the hybrid, but weight is the problem with that one.
In my view, Nissan has been neglecting engine development for a while, so they've fallen behind in introducing new technology in mass-produced engines. This is why they need to get an engine from Mercedes for the Q50. They've also fallen behind in transmissions (other than CVT). Hopefully, the new Jatco 8-speed will correct that.
Don't get me wrong, I like the 328i, but In my real life experience, the G37 speeds surpassed the 328i any time, any where.
But all this power talks is too simplistic. If the Q50 had improved its handling and refinement then 328 horse is quite a lot and most people can't handle that kind of power anyway. I traveled the interstates a lot, and you think if you have a fast car like the S5 you will own the road? No, a crazy kid in a Corolla who is willing to speed to 110 mph for a minute will have you beat.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 335
Likes: 4
From: nyc
When in sport mode, the 328i does feel a lot more responsive and agile than the G37.
It might not be a faster car at WOT but it is a more enjoyable car to drive in the urban city condition.
Agreed. That is the problem. Everyone compares the G as if they are on a racetrack everyday, WOT all day long.
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 192
So NO ONE here has driven the Q50, but SOME of you know that it wont be quicker/handle better than the G37 because it uses the same VQ37?
It also wont get better Fuel economy because it still uses the same VQ37 right?
Guys come on, the Q50 is Infinitis make it or break it car just like the G37 was. Best believe its an evolution with improvements over the last generation.
You dont always have to change the engine to make it a better car.
I got my money on it being quicker and improved fuel economy and this is on the 3.7 car.
It also wont get better Fuel economy because it still uses the same VQ37 right?
Guys come on, the Q50 is Infinitis make it or break it car just like the G37 was. Best believe its an evolution with improvements over the last generation.
You dont always have to change the engine to make it a better car.
I got my money on it being quicker and improved fuel economy and this is on the 3.7 car.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 11
328 will be faster when the G37 driver does not want to race you. I know I won't bother till I see a 335.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 11
So NO ONE here has driven the Q50, but SOME of you know that it wont be quicker/handle better than the G37 because it uses the same VQ37?
It also wont get better Fuel economy because it still uses the same VQ37 right?
Guys come on, the Q50 is Infinitis make it or break it car just like the G37 was. Best believe its an evolution with improvements over the last generation.
You dont always have to change the engine to make it a better car.
I got my money on it being quicker and improved fuel economy and this is on the 3.7 car.
It also wont get better Fuel economy because it still uses the same VQ37 right?
Guys come on, the Q50 is Infinitis make it or break it car just like the G37 was. Best believe its an evolution with improvements over the last generation.
You dont always have to change the engine to make it a better car.
I got my money on it being quicker and improved fuel economy and this is on the 3.7 car.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 335
Likes: 4
From: nyc
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 222
Likes: 19
Ben Poore, VP Infiniti Americas, stated the 3.7 is slated to get about 3 mpg better fuel economy. There is also a chance the car could be quicker. These things cannot be called until the car is tested, yet there seem to be so many CONCRETE statements in this thread about what the Q50 WILL NOT be capable of...
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 11
^^ Hmm.. the 3.7 still make the same hp and tq, it's unlikely any improvements have been done. So it's left to see the changes they put into the 7AT. Taller gears would gain mpg but lose performance given the cars have minimal weight difference. Maybe a quicker shifting AT?
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 2
From: Blairsville or McDonough, GA
Auto-dimming outside mirrors with reverse tilt-down feature
Dual occupant memory system for driver's seat, mirrors and steering wheel settings, linked to individual Intelligent Keys
Maple wood trim
Rain-sensing front windshield wipers
Adaptive Front lighting System (AFS) with auto-leveling headlights
High Beam Assist (high/low automatic change)
Distance Control Assist (DCA)[*]
Blind Spot Warning (BSW) and Blind Spot Intervention® (BSI®) Systems[*]
Back-up Collision Intervention (BCI)[*]
Front seat Pre-Crash Seat Belts
Intelligent Cruise Control (Full-Speed Range)[*]
Forward Emergency Braking (FEB)[*]
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)[*]
Lane Departure Prevention (LDP) with Active Lane Control[*]
Dual occupant memory system for driver's seat, mirrors and steering wheel settings, linked to individual Intelligent Keys
Maple wood trim
Rain-sensing front windshield wipers
Adaptive Front lighting System (AFS) with auto-leveling headlights
High Beam Assist (high/low automatic change)
Distance Control Assist (DCA)[*]
Blind Spot Warning (BSW) and Blind Spot Intervention® (BSI®) Systems[*]
Back-up Collision Intervention (BCI)[*]
Front seat Pre-Crash Seat Belts
Intelligent Cruise Control (Full-Speed Range)[*]
Forward Emergency Braking (FEB)[*]
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)[*]
Lane Departure Prevention (LDP) with Active Lane Control[*]
These are all cool toys on the M BTW, especially the ones bolded. I hope you guys and gals enjoy them on your new Qs.
Awesome.