G37 Sedan

Q50 Pre-Order Pricing Announced

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 10:43 PM
  #91  
visualguy's Avatar
visualguy
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 237
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by 00Max00
Exactly. Automatics are getting better with every iteration. Many high powered vehicles are now available with only automatics, manual just make them slower anyway. Look at the M5, better off with an automatic performance-wise unless you are a die-hard manual fan. Most advantages manual once enjoyed no longer exist.
No performance advantage for manual in most cases, but it's more fun to drive (assuming you don't spend much time in bad traffic or in a hilly city like SF).

Manual is still more fun in my experience even when compared to state-of-the-art automatics like the DCT, DSG, PDK, MCT, and ZF 8-speed, not to mention the old-school Jatco 7AT that Infiniti is using.

Jatco is developing a new 8-speed transmission for the Infiniti Q50 turbo 4-cyl that's supposed to come out in two years with the Mercedes engine, so I wouldn't be surprised if the automatic transmissions on other Q50 models are upgraded as well in that time frame...
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 10:51 PM
  #92  
visualguy's Avatar
visualguy
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 237
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by WannabeSport
i'll eventually add a cheap sporty roadster to my driveway and at that point, it will ahve a manual.
I thought about this too, but I would need to park it in my driveway or on the street (no space in the garage for another car), and that just doesn't work.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 12:28 AM
  #93  
sniper27's Avatar
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 79
From: S. Cal
Originally Posted by WannabeSport
I also drive a manual G and could care less if it is offered with one because I am done buying manual sedans... i'll eventually add a cheap sporty roadster to my driveway and at that point, it will ahve a manual. But my automatic sedan that i drive every day, 20k a year, just give me the auto.

Im one of the few that likes the 7AT. I'v driven countless cars over the years with that 7AT and I have never felt the glitches and hunting and what not that people complain about. When I plant it, it just flies. That is one of the fastest, most responsive transmissions I have sampled (and iv driven a lot of cars...) and it never fails to impress me.
do you drive in heavy stop and go traffic majority of the time?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 12:46 AM
  #94  
da mayor's Avatar
da mayor
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 36
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Black Betty
Amazing how much it looks exactly like the current G coupe. I should delete this before half the forum flips their lid. Some people wont get it.
Infiniti corporate deleted it too. All models MY2013 on the floor got rebadged back to the current G/M /FX names ut they kept the new q/QX floor,ats in. Smh
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 01:52 AM
  #95  
Wongster's Avatar
Wongster
Registered Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 192
Likes: 7
From: SF, CA
Originally Posted by visualguy
No performance advantage for manual in most cases, but it's more fun to drive (assuming you don't spend much time in bad traffic or in a hilly city like SF).
I spend plenty of time in bad traffic, live in SF and still think a manual is more fun to drive. However, I have also accepted the fact that manual transmissions are slowly fading away in the automotive industry.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 10:06 AM
  #96  
Black Betty's Avatar
Black Betty
Lexus Defector
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 21,148
Likes: 2,093
Originally Posted by visualguy
No performance advantage for manual in most cases, but it's more fun to drive (assuming you don't spend much time in bad traffic or in a hilly city like SF).

Manual is still more fun in my experience even when compared to state-of-the-art automatics like the DCT, DSG, PDK, MCT, and ZF 8-speed, not to mention the old-school Jatco 7AT that Infiniti is using.

Jatco is developing a new 8-speed transmission for the Infiniti Q50 turbo 4-cyl that's supposed to come out in two years with the Mercedes engine, so I wouldn't be surprised if the automatic transmissions on other Q50 models are upgraded as well in that time frame...


Interesting. Any details on it? Dual clutch? I'm guessing the 8 speed thing is to try to manipulate better fuel mileage claims to meet governmental requirements here and in Europe. 8 forward gears is kind of getting to the point of being too many IMO. I'm not sure that 7 isn't too many. The only auto I've driven with any regularity in recent years is my work car which is a '96 Maxima that has a 4 speed. That seems like plenty. I could see 5 or 6. But 8? Come on now.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 10:09 AM
  #97  
ErikM's Avatar
ErikM
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 165
Likes: 9
From: NJ
Q50 AWD Sport with Nav.. $46150.. about $1000. more than my 2013.. I've got no issue with pricing.. of course we'll see what lease payments are like, of course they'll be a bit high in the beginning. I purposely bought my 13 because I figured I didn't want first year and by 2016 they'll have the bugs out, they may do a slight refresh, and there should be deals and special leases..
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 11:25 AM
  #98  
volnedan's Avatar
volnedan
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Again, wanting to drive a manual transmission is a preference. I don't care about how good automatic or dual clutch transmissions have become, I'd just rather drive a manual.

The same argument goes to the type of car you buy. Do you NEED 330hp? Or track tuned suspension, since about 3% of drivers actually track their cars? If you are just commuting to work everyday, get a 4 banger Camry that gets 30+ mpg and has plenty of creature comforts.

For me, I cannot afford to have a 3rd "play car" with a manual, and due to my family I need 4 doors and larger trunk. This car is the perfect compromise of sporty fun and utility. Why do people get so bent out of shape when they voice their preference for a manual?

Last edited by volnedan; Mar 29, 2013 at 02:51 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 11:48 AM
  #99  
sniper27's Avatar
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 79
From: S. Cal
Originally Posted by volnedan
Again, wanting to drive a manual transmission is a preference. I don't care about how good automatic or dual clutch transmissions have become, I'd just rather drive a manual.

The same argument goes to the type of car you buy. Do you NEED 330hp? Or track tuned suspension, since about 3% of drivers actually track their cars? If you are just commuting to work everyday, get a 4 banger Camry that gets 30+ mpg and has plenty of creature comforts.

For me, I cannot afford to have a 3rd "play car" with a manual, and due to my family I need 4 doors and larger trunk. This car is the perfect compromise of sporty fun and utility. Why do people get so bent out of shape when their voice their preference for a manual?
In a non-democratic forum, people will get bent out of shape when they hear something they don't want to hear or conforms to the majority.

I agree that everything is a preference. That's why most people here is die hard set on Infiniti is such a great car. Rightly so, since this is an Infiniti forum. But you will get the same types of praise from other car forums about their cars. I think Infiniti has always been geared towards pricing their car as "best bang for your buck". They try to package a great overall package, without exceeding expectations in any categories. The power is decent, but not spectacular if you consider torque and power delivery. The handling is good, but again, not stellar. The 7AT was aimed at improving fuel economy, but do so very minimally with less than stellar performance. The interior is nice, but not the best quality. But they put together an overall package that is decent and acceptable to most and priced it competitively. That is what they really have going for them, and "value" was the only reason I bought the G.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 11:50 AM
  #100  
g37guy01's Avatar
g37guy01
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 15
From: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Originally Posted by volnedan
Again, wanting to drive a manual transmission is a preference. I don't care about how good automatic or dual clutch transmissions have become, I'd just rather drive a manual.

The same argument goes to the type of car you buy. Do you NEED 330hp? Or track tuned suspension, since about 3% of drivers actually track their cars? If you are just commuting to work everyday, get a 4 banger Camry that gets 30+ mpg and has plenty of creature comforts.

For me, I cannot afford to have a 3rd "play car" with a manual, and due to my family I need 4 doors and larger trunk. This car is the perfect compromise of sporty fun and utility. Why do people get so bent out of shape when their voice their preference for a manual?
IDK, these are sporty cars, not sports cars. It seems Honda and BMW want the manual crowd. I agree this car has the best value, best blend of sport and utility. You could get a TL, which is also a good value with the luxury/sports needle more toward the luxury end. But my preference is for the G/Q.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #101  
00Max00's Avatar
00Max00
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Black Betty


Interesting. Any details on it? Dual clutch? I'm guessing the 8 speed thing is to try to manipulate better fuel mileage claims to meet governmental requirements here and in Europe. 8 forward gears is kind of getting to the point of being too many IMO. I'm not sure that 7 isn't too many. The only auto I've driven with any regularity in recent years is my work car which is a '96 Maxima that has a 4 speed. That seems like plenty. I could see 5 or 6. But 8? Come on now.
Plus I believe more cogs the better use of powerband of a less powerful engine. With manual, there's a limit for how many gears a human can shift efficiently, that magic number is usually 5 or 6. Since the computers don't care and an auto shifts faster than human does anyway, they can easily put 8, 10, 12 speeds in there. I guess an engine with narrower powerband would benefit from more gears. But I don't see it as much advantage to pair an 8-speed with a powerful VQ37VHR as with a 4-banger. It makes sense that they would pair it with a Turbo 4.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 03:16 PM
  #102  
kcg37's Avatar
kcg37
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
I'm with Volnedan. Got a family, need a 4door, and love to autocross (haven't tracked the g yet-no time or oil cooler for that matter). I've been there done that with a weekend 3rd car w/ sc'd e36. I think its kind of a waste of resources to maintain a car that gets used very little. We've got an EOS w/ DSG sport package, pretty much the best auto tranny in a mass produced vehicle. Still not as fun. I suppose it's considered fun for the video game set.
Opponents will say the autos are faster, they are, but that's not the point. It's a statement for an automotive manufacturer to separate themselves from the herd of the me too generic rental cars. Really, whats the point of the rwd platform if performance isn't a high priority. Might as well be fwd - better packaging, efficiency etc.
Pretty sure I'm into an ATS or maybe new wrx/sti as a replacement. Too bad.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 04:46 PM
  #103  
keraxis's Avatar
keraxis
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 552
Likes: 25
From: Herndon, VA
I mentioned it

Thats why i mentioned that they even started to offer a manual in the M5 after years of not having it. Auto trans are merging in technology with manual transmissions. The 7at in our cars just isnt up to snuff and that could be programing. The hunting is unacceptable. I was hopeing for a duel clutch in this model which never came about.

Originally Posted by Black Betty
So I guess people who refuse to drive any car without a manual transmission can take solace in BMW and go buy and drive them. If they are catering to that market, more power to them, they have a built in customer base. People whining because Infiniti is introducing the Q50 without a MT option are the same people complaining about how the current AT is horrible and the less than refined clutch in the MT. Maybe they're working on an improvement for both and will bring them out in the near future as an improvement, did anyone think of that?

I have a manual. But people who can't see that the automotive industry is changing away form manual transmissions altogether just don't get it. I'm making peace with that fact now. They are dying. Quickly.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 04:54 PM
  #104  
keraxis's Avatar
keraxis
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 552
Likes: 25
From: Herndon, VA
8 makes sense

Originally Posted by Black Betty


Interesting. Any details on it? Dual clutch? I'm guessing the 8 speed thing is to try to manipulate better fuel mileage claims to meet governmental requirements here and in Europe. 8 forward gears is kind of getting to the point of being too many IMO. I'm not sure that 7 isn't too many. The only auto I've driven with any regularity in recent years is my work car which is a '96 Maxima that has a 4 speed. That seems like plenty. I could see 5 or 6. But 8? Come on now.
I would imagine the new turbo 4 will have modes. one of which will be a EPA mode and with 8 gears you can keep your engine out of boost or push in a sport mode and keep it in boost. kinda like that button in the juke that gives you more power. 4 turbo with a 8 speed will probably be able to cruze at highway speeds with minimal boost.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 05:49 PM
  #105  
00Max00's Avatar
00Max00
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by keraxis
I would imagine the new turbo 4 will have modes. one of which will be a EPA mode and with 8 gears you can keep your engine out of boost or push in a sport mode and keep it in boost. kinda like that button in the juke that gives you more power. 4 turbo with a 8 speed will probably be able to cruze at highway speeds with minimal boost.
No way... that thing has no torque off boost. At 60 mph, 8th gear, the rev is likely under 2K. There's simply no replacement for displacement at that kind of rmp. The turbo have to work hard on even the slightest throttle input.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 PM.