How does the '11 AWD system REALLY work?
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 941
Likes: 10
From: Southern Illinois
How does the '11 AWD system REALLY work?
I've been told one story by the salesman, another 2 by service advisors.
1. It's full-time 60/40, R/F. (service)
2. 100% rear until a certain (unknown) slippage on the rears occurs. (service)
3. 100% full-time 50/50 R/F. (salesman)
I'm thinking #2 makes more sense, what say ye?
1. It's full-time 60/40, R/F. (service)
2. 100% rear until a certain (unknown) slippage on the rears occurs. (service)
3. 100% full-time 50/50 R/F. (salesman)
I'm thinking #2 makes more sense, what say ye?
G-DOG
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 4
From: Louisville, KY (relocated from Brooklyn, NY)
It's #2 (100% RWD until a certain the systems detects wheel slippage).
EDIT: Specifically, there is a 5% front-rear rotational speed differential slip threshold that when exceeded activates power transfer to the front wheels
EDIT: Specifically, there is a 5% front-rear rotational speed differential slip threshold that when exceeded activates power transfer to the front wheels
Last edited by DocJohn; Jul 5, 2012 at 11:47 AM.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 941
Likes: 10
From: Southern Illinois
Yes, my understanding on that is it feathers the throttle and adjusts the trans shift points up to a certain (30?) speed. However on the 50/50 that I'm not aware of.
Trending Topics
Snow button, I believe, just decreases the sensitivity of the throttle. An easy way to put the debate to rest is to have a person with awd activate the snow button and then make a tight turn at lows speeds. Anybody that has driven a 4wd truck knows that when you low speed tight turn the 4wd will fight with you, making the turn jerky/not smooth at all. It's just an inherent side effect of a 50/50 split.
Last edited by Redpit; Jul 5, 2012 at 12:41 PM.
Snow button, I believe, just decreases the sensitivity of the throttle. An easy way to put the debate to rest is to have a person with awd activate the snow button and then make a tight turn at lows speeds. Anybody that has driven a 4wd truck knows that when you low speed tight turn the 4wd will fight with you, making the turn jerky/not smooth at all. It's just an inherent side effect of a 50/50 split.
Why? The system we have is the best of all worlds compared to every other AWD system out there (and I have owned and driven plenty of them).
You always want to have RWD as a base (if you care about sporty driving that is) -- check.
You want to be able to have instantaneous and smooth transition to AWD when needed, with no torque steer -- check.
You want to be able to lock it into 50/50 for deep snow/mud/gravel/etc. -- check.
You want two-wheel drive for better fuel economy for the 95% of the time you don't need the extra traction -- check.
You want AWD for launch (which our system has, based on speed and throttle position, it always launches from a rest in AWD mode and then quickly reverts to RWD when it figures out you are not slipping) -- check.
What's left that the Nissan system is not superior for?
Having a permanent 60/40 or 50/50 split has only one advantage--predictability. This is rendered irrelevant in the world of electronic traction control and other nannies. It is also a double-edged sword: it is predictable that you will understeer under heavy throtlle while turning. I prefer the balance of RWD (that all sports cars use), but the "nanny" of AWD ready to jump in in a split second if I screw-up or some unexpected loose surface or road problem suddenly appears.
I would love for somone to list a scenario where the ATTESA system is inferior to mechanical AWD (Audi larger models and Subaru manual transmission), the traction controlled open diff systems like BMW and M-B or Haldex (or Haldex-like) systems on FWD cars (pretty much everything else out there).
You always want to have RWD as a base (if you care about sporty driving that is) -- check.
You want to be able to have instantaneous and smooth transition to AWD when needed, with no torque steer -- check.
You want to be able to lock it into 50/50 for deep snow/mud/gravel/etc. -- check.
You want two-wheel drive for better fuel economy for the 95% of the time you don't need the extra traction -- check.
You want AWD for launch (which our system has, based on speed and throttle position, it always launches from a rest in AWD mode and then quickly reverts to RWD when it figures out you are not slipping) -- check.
What's left that the Nissan system is not superior for?
Having a permanent 60/40 or 50/50 split has only one advantage--predictability. This is rendered irrelevant in the world of electronic traction control and other nannies. It is also a double-edged sword: it is predictable that you will understeer under heavy throtlle while turning. I prefer the balance of RWD (that all sports cars use), but the "nanny" of AWD ready to jump in in a split second if I screw-up or some unexpected loose surface or road problem suddenly appears.
I would love for somone to list a scenario where the ATTESA system is inferior to mechanical AWD (Audi larger models and Subaru manual transmission), the traction controlled open diff systems like BMW and M-B or Haldex (or Haldex-like) systems on FWD cars (pretty much everything else out there).
Although with the temperature predicted to be about 100 on Saturday, the snow button is about the farthest thing from my mind.


