G37 Sedan
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone wish G37 gained tq instead of hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2010, 11:47 PM
  #31  
XSman
Registered User
 
XSman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 167
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jwoods986
Applies to all G37s, but since I have a sedan, I'll post it here. When Infiniti went from the 3.5 to the 3.7, hp went up 22 but torque only went up 1. Now, that's great for marketing and all-out driving (1/4 mile runs seem to be about .2 quicker). But I'm guessing, since I haven't owned a G before, that for everyday, not going over 4000 rpm driving, that there isn't much of a difference. So I was wondering if anyone else feels that Infiniti should have increased the tq instead of hp with the displacement increase? Just thinking out loud.
You're also comparing a 5AT to a 7AT sedan. I've driven both and I prefer my 7AT. To me there's more pull.
Old 04-23-2010, 01:10 PM
  #32  
Noremac
Registered User
 
Noremac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wash DC metro
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gdub172
I truly agree with having torque in the lower rpms. Nevertheless, the G is the best bang for the buck in it's class.

I think adding DI on the 3.7 would also have a better flow of torque, what do you guys think?
I think what we will see instead is a beefy 100+ kW electric motor in the next gen hybrid G. Let that motor fill in the low RPM torque, while improving MPGs also - as will be required under the new EPA regulations which begin in MY2011 and really ramp up by MY2016.
Old 04-23-2010, 01:56 PM
  #33  
CodeG
Registered User
 
CodeG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The G is a fast car already. It has tire chirping acceleration, and 7200 rpm red line to use; sure there are always faster cars out there, but the best way is to improve the nut behind the wheel.
DI is great, until you have to replace expensive fuel pump or components.
Old 04-23-2010, 02:09 PM
  #34  
san~man
Registered User
 
san~man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Gamedog
Because we arent douchebags lol
As a G and a 3 owner, I resent that statement

Old 04-23-2010, 02:11 PM
  #35  
ozzypriest
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ozzypriest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Deep South MS
Posts: 745
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
My giant, lard-assed G8 GT was doing 4.9 0-60s with just a tune. IMO, the G could stand to have a little more tq down low, although
in most ways the vq37 was a step in the right direction.
Old 04-23-2010, 03:29 PM
  #36  
ElLayG37s
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
ElLayG37s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: City of Lost Angels.
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Remo101
I got an awesome mod to get loads of torque.



............ traded the G37 for a 2009 CTS-V 551 lbs torque. Sorry, had to do it.
Yeah but that's such a old man car, and when I say old I'm talking like 60's, if it had to be American I would took the new SS.
Old 04-23-2010, 04:01 PM
  #37  
Remo101
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Remo101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ElLayG37s
Yeah but that's such a old man car, and when I say old I'm talking like 60's, if it had to be American I would took the new SS.
Really, do you think the car below is an old man's car? You know the average age of a G37 owner is like 50. It's all good though I'll blow by you in my old man's car.



My trunk:
Old 04-23-2010, 04:09 PM
  #38  
san~man
Registered User
 
san~man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
I'd sport a CTS-V over a G any day of the week. It isn't like that's a DeVille or anything, wtf.

I would ditch the chrome wheels though, but that's just me. PC those and they'd look sick.
Old 04-23-2010, 04:18 PM
  #39  
LightsOut
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
LightsOut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: (323)-(909)
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Remo101
Really, do you think the car below is an old man's car? You know the average age of a G37 owner is like 50. It's all good though I'll blow by you in my old man's car.



My trunk:

trying to convince my older brother to get one.

it's pretty much a detuned ZR1
Old 04-23-2010, 04:23 PM
  #40  
ElLayG37s
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
ElLayG37s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: City of Lost Angels.
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ozzypriest
My giant, lard-assed G8 GT was doing 4.9 0-60s with just a tune. IMO, the G could stand to have a little more tq down low, although
in most ways the vq37 was a step in the right direction.

I would love more torque! It's ok when driving solo, but when I got the wife and 2 kids in the rear it freakin sucks.
Old 04-23-2010, 04:29 PM
  #41  
Xcalibur
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Xcalibur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,386
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
They should offer the Ms v8 but beefed!
Old 04-23-2010, 04:33 PM
  #42  
ElLayG37s
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
ElLayG37s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: City of Lost Angels.
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Remo101
Really, do you think the car below is an old man's car? You know the average age of a G37 owner is like 50. It's all good though I'll blow by you in my old man's car.



My trunk:

Yeah I sti does look grandpaish, I never said it wasn't fast, you can't even copare the 2 engines, yeah the caddy is by far faster, but for that amont of money hmmm I would personally jmo into something else, don't get me wrong when it comes to American I'm a GM guy, I've owned 2 MC SS's in my lifetime and own a 64 ss that I'm rebuilding, so I Know the GM Torgue, it's just caddy does not make a sexy car. Just my opinion.
Old 04-23-2010, 05:38 PM
  #43  
Remo101
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Remo101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ElLayG37s - your sure welcome to your opinion. Well, at least we agree that the G37 is sexy. I still love the Gs.

Also, for the money you would be hard pressed to find anything new and faster for the money.
Old 04-23-2010, 05:56 PM
  #44  
RISKY GUY
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
RISKY GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,078
Received 43 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Remo101
ElLayG37s - your sure welcome to your opinion. Well, at least we agree that the G37 is sexy. I still love the Gs.

Also, for the money you would be hard pressed to find anything new and faster for the money.

Remo 101 that is a monster you have.

Not only is it drop dead mean looking, its got the ***** to back it up.

Old 04-23-2010, 06:54 PM
  #45  
chasemyaccord
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
chasemyaccord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
One word answer: EVERYONE


Quick Reply: Anyone wish G37 gained tq instead of hp?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 PM.