When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Applies to all G37s, but since I have a sedan, I'll post it here. When Infiniti went from the 3.5 to the 3.7, hp went up 22 but torque only went up 1. Now, that's great for marketing and all-out driving (1/4 mile runs seem to be about .2 quicker). But I'm guessing, since I haven't owned a G before, that for everyday, not going over 4000 rpm driving, that there isn't much of a difference. So I was wondering if anyone else feels that Infiniti should have increased the tq instead of hp with the displacement increase? Just thinking out loud.
You're also comparing a 5AT to a 7AT sedan. I've driven both and I prefer my 7AT. To me there's more pull.
I truly agree with having torque in the lower rpms. Nevertheless, the G is the best bang for the buck in it's class.
I think adding DI on the 3.7 would also have a better flow of torque, what do you guys think?
I think what we will see instead is a beefy 100+ kW electric motor in the next gen hybrid G. Let that motor fill in the low RPM torque, while improving MPGs also - as will be required under the new EPA regulations which begin in MY2011 and really ramp up by MY2016.
The G is a fast car already. It has tire chirping acceleration, and 7200 rpm red line to use; sure there are always faster cars out there, but the best way is to improve the nut behind the wheel.
DI is great, until you have to replace expensive fuel pump or components.
My giant, lard-assed G8 GT was doing 4.9 0-60s with just a tune. IMO, the G could stand to have a little more tq down low, although
in most ways the vq37 was a step in the right direction.
Yeah but that's such a old man car, and when I say old I'm talking like 60's, if it had to be American I would took the new SS.
Really, do you think the car below is an old man's car? You know the average age of a G37 owner is like 50. It's all good though I'll blow by you in my old man's car.
Really, do you think the car below is an old man's car? You know the average age of a G37 owner is like 50. It's all good though I'll blow by you in my old man's car.
My giant, lard-assed G8 GT was doing 4.9 0-60s with just a tune. IMO, the G could stand to have a little more tq down low, although
in most ways the vq37 was a step in the right direction.
I would love more torque! It's ok when driving solo, but when I got the wife and 2 kids in the rear it freakin sucks.
Really, do you think the car below is an old man's car? You know the average age of a G37 owner is like 50. It's all good though I'll blow by you in my old man's car.
My trunk:
Yeah I sti does look grandpaish, I never said it wasn't fast, you can't even copare the 2 engines, yeah the caddy is by far faster, but for that amont of money hmmm I would personally jmo into something else, don't get me wrong when it comes to American I'm a GM guy, I've owned 2 MC SS's in my lifetime and own a 64 ss that I'm rebuilding, so I Know the GM Torgue, it's just caddy does not make a sexy car. Just my opinion.