Did any of you actually view the slide show and see which cars were listed and the selection criteria used? If you did and you have a model that was left out, please submit it for intelligent debate or discussion.

 

Thats whats up ....

 

Ok...here we go...

TTS, 335, 135, Z4, Boxter....all of those cars are better than the G37 in handling, accelerating, braking, and interior. They are more money, but they are still under 50k. Mustangs (including v6), Challengers, and Camaros, while being not as well appointed on the inside, are still faster.

 

back to BB's question...did you actually look at the link? Several of those are in the article. The G is listed as ONE of the fastest, not THE fastest.

You listed 5 cars you say are better than the G in several areas (some of which I don't agree with but that's beside the point), how many cars under 50K aren't as fast as the G? Many more than 5...

 

I looked at the slide show, and all of those cars listed were faster than the G, or equal to it.

 

im right, no im right, NO IM RIGHT...MOM!!! HE STARTED IT!!!!

 

they forgot lancer EVO and WRX

 

i didnt really take in how fast and powerful this car was until the other night while driving on the highway. a bmw 335i pulls up next to me me and begins to hook ( i knew what this ment). so as we sped off he was quicker but the power of the g surpassed him 3 times. he was pissed off and kept trying to do this to me so i exited off the highway and gave the high beams a triple flicker (maybe next time). we did not race just so you know.

 

For sure not honda, but maybe Acura long ago Why? fanboyism to what??? Do you like Mustang? Maybe you like Hundai too?