Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G37? Find out the answer in here!

P1093 code returns again days later

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2018 | 09:38 PM
  #16  
saywat?'s Avatar
saywat?
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 277
so what happens to the $5k u spent if they couldnt fix it that time? they keep trying for free?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2018 | 12:19 PM
  #17  
nethole's Avatar
nethole
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 249
Likes: 1
From: Williamsburg, VA
oh story gets better. Of course the dealer replaced the head. A head which was supposedly populated with 'all the goodies'. Turns out a few years ago, Nissan stopped populating the heads with the actuators (found this out from a second source who I should have gone to originally to resolve the problem, but I wasn't aware of them at the time). So, when the dealer replace 'the head' in a blanket attempt to replace all the things that could be wrong and cause the P1093, they replaced everything but the ONE thing that was actually causing the problem. In my case, an actuator with an intermittent problem. Also, from the sheets, it was obvious what a different person did the job from the one who actually did the actual daignosis. So 'the guy who did the diag thought the head was populated, guy who did the work saw the report to 'replace the head', each did his own job.

The dealer replaced the actuator, and so far, everything is working fine now . . . .

so yah, a MASSIVELY fraggin expensive job for what should have been an actuator replacement (plus diag time)
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2018 | 02:10 PM
  #18  
telcoman's Avatar
telcoman
Registered Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 161
From: NJ
Originally Posted by nethole
oh story gets better. Of course the dealer replaced the head. A head which was supposedly populated with 'all the goodies'. Turns out a few years ago, Nissan stopped populating the heads with the actuators (found this out from a second source who I should have gone to originally to resolve the problem, but I wasn't aware of them at the time). So, when the dealer replace 'the head' in a blanket attempt to replace all the things that could be wrong and cause the P1093, they replaced everything but the ONE thing that was actually causing the problem. In my case, an actuator with an intermittent problem. Also, from the sheets, it was obvious what a different person did the job from the one who actually did the actual daignosis. So 'the guy who did the diag thought the head was populated, guy who did the work saw the report to 'replace the head', each did his own job.

The dealer replaced the actuator, and so far, everything is working fine now . . . .

so yah, a MASSIVELY fraggin expensive job for what should have been an actuator replacement (plus diag time)
You might have some sort of financial recourse particularly if you paid by credit card?

First speak to the Infiniti Service Manager and the General Dealer Manager for some financial adjustment.
If not satisfied write a letter with copies of your dealer receipts to your credit card company for improper diagnosis and poor workmanship.

Also contact Infiniti Customer Relations if necessary

Good luck

Telcoman
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2020 | 01:44 PM
  #19  
mummy2's Avatar
mummy2
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 985
Likes: 144
From: Baltimore
Originally Posted by nethole
oh story gets better. Of course the dealer replaced the head. A head which was supposedly populated with 'all the goodies'. Turns out a few years ago, Nissan stopped populating the heads with the actuators (found this out from a second source who I should have gone to originally to resolve the problem, but I wasn't aware of them at the time). So, when the dealer replace 'the head' in a blanket attempt to replace all the things that could be wrong and cause the P1093, they replaced everything but the ONE thing that was actually causing the problem. In my case, an actuator with an intermittent problem. Also, from the sheets, it was obvious what a different person did the job from the one who actually did the actual daignosis. So 'the guy who did the diag thought the head was populated, guy who did the work saw the report to 'replace the head', each did his own job.

The dealer replaced the actuator, and so far, everything is working fine now . . . .

so yah, a MASSIVELY fraggin expensive job for what should have been an actuator replacement (plus diag time)
Any updates?

Reply
Old Apr 26, 2020 | 02:54 PM
  #20  
nethole's Avatar
nethole
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 249
Likes: 1
From: Williamsburg, VA
Vehicle has behaved normally for the past two years since the actuator was replaced .
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2020 | 03:18 PM
  #21  
mummy2's Avatar
mummy2
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 985
Likes: 144
From: Baltimore
Originally Posted by nethole
Vehicle has behaved normally for the past two years since the actuator was replaced .
Good but I mean did they give you some of your money back?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2023 | 01:34 PM
  #22  
Radbrad2023's Avatar
Radbrad2023
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by nethole
oh story gets better. Of course the dealer replaced the head. A head which was supposedly populated with 'all the goodies'. Turns out a few years ago, Nissan stopped populating the heads with the actuators (found this out from a second source who I should have gone to originally to resolve the problem, but I wasn't aware of them at the time). So, when the dealer replace 'the head' in a blanket attempt to replace all the things that could be wrong and cause the P1093, they replaced everything but the ONE thing that was actually causing the problem. In my case, an actuator with an intermittent problem. Also, from the sheets, it was obvious what a different person did the job from the one who actually did the actual daignosis. So 'the guy who did the diag thought the head was populated, guy who did the work saw the report to 'replace the head', each did his own job.

The dealer replaced the actuator, and so far, everything is working fine now . . . .

so yah, a MASSIVELY fraggin expensive job for what should have been an actuator replacement (plus diag time)
hey man I’m having a problem with the same code rn I just wanted to confirm what actuator did the dealership replace to solve the issues for you ?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikeb89
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
4
Oct 3, 2017 01:00 AM
EnviedG35
Picture Share G Sedan
15
Sep 26, 2010 11:06 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.