Help Stillen SC fuel and cooling issues
#1
Registered Member
Thread Starter
Stillen SC fuel and cooling issues
Hello.
Currently, my car is at Stillen due to issues I had post-install. There appear to be two major problems with Stillen's SC kit.
1. Fuel management - the tune appears to have a big problem with fuel. It's definitely not properly managed given the overwhelming number of vehicles that experienced the identical aftermath in short time-periods.
2. Cooling - I've been reading a lot about cooling problems. It seems that the Frozenboost heat-exchanger is the answer to this, but Stillen says it will violate EPA regulations.
My two questions -
1. Who has solved the fuel management issue?
2. How hard would it be for Stillen to get the heat-exchanger emissions approved? Given that the heat-exchanger is a serious necessity, they need to look into making it simply part of the kit.
Currently, my car is at Stillen due to issues I had post-install. There appear to be two major problems with Stillen's SC kit.
1. Fuel management - the tune appears to have a big problem with fuel. It's definitely not properly managed given the overwhelming number of vehicles that experienced the identical aftermath in short time-periods.
2. Cooling - I've been reading a lot about cooling problems. It seems that the Frozenboost heat-exchanger is the answer to this, but Stillen says it will violate EPA regulations.
My two questions -
1. Who has solved the fuel management issue?
2. How hard would it be for Stillen to get the heat-exchanger emissions approved? Given that the heat-exchanger is a serious necessity, they need to look into making it simply part of the kit.
#2
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
Whats the fueling issue? and them telling you the Frozenboost heat-exchanger will violate EPA regulations is BS they are supposed to release a STG kit with it, I saw the post on here somewhere.
An the theFrozenboost heat-exchanger is the same as theirs:/ Just bigger cooling area,
An the theFrozenboost heat-exchanger is the same as theirs:/ Just bigger cooling area,
#3
Registered Member
Thread Starter
Whats the fueling issue? and them telling you the Frozenboost heat-exchanger will violate EPA regulations is BS they are supposed to release a STG kit with it, I saw the post on here somewhere.
An the theFrozenboost heat-exchanger is the same as theirs:/ Just bigger cooling area,
An the theFrozenboost heat-exchanger is the same as theirs:/ Just bigger cooling area,
#7
Registered Member
Thread Starter
Trending Topics
#9
Registered Member
Thread Starter
#10
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
Keep us updated. After tons of reading it seems WAY to common people are destroying their motors with the stillen SC?
Whether it's the tune or heat issue causing damage, idk im still pretty new to FI. (So please correct me if I'm wrong)
I wonder if there would be as many issues had they used ecutek instead of uprev?
Whether it's the tune or heat issue causing damage, idk im still pretty new to FI. (So please correct me if I'm wrong)
I wonder if there would be as many issues had they used ecutek instead of uprev?
#11
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
The issue is with the software but the tune itself, I believe the OP is on the Stillen tune.
I think also the cooling issue us with IAT's the MAF's on the kit are "PRE" SC and not post, I always thought post would have better IAT's
I think also the cooling issue us with IAT's the MAF's on the kit are "PRE" SC and not post, I always thought post would have better IAT's
#12
Registered Member
Keep us updated. After tons of reading it seems WAY to common people are destroying their motors with the stillen SC?
Whether it's the tune or heat issue causing damage, idk im still pretty new to FI. (So please correct me if I'm wrong)
I wonder if there would be as many issues had they used ecutek instead of uprev?
Whether it's the tune or heat issue causing damage, idk im still pretty new to FI. (So please correct me if I'm wrong)
I wonder if there would be as many issues had they used ecutek instead of uprev?
The following users liked this post:
DJE44 (03-07-2016)
#13
Registered Member
Hello.
Currently, my car is at Stillen due to issues I had post-install. There appear to be two major problems with Stillen's SC kit.
1. Fuel management - the tune appears to have a big problem with fuel. It's definitely not properly managed given the overwhelming number of vehicles that experienced the identical aftermath in short time-periods.
2. Cooling - I've been reading a lot about cooling problems. It seems that the Frozenboost heat-exchanger is the answer to this, but Stillen says it will violate EPA regulations.
My two questions -
1. Who has solved the fuel management issue?
2. How hard would it be for Stillen to get the heat-exchanger emissions approved? Given that the heat-exchanger is a serious necessity, they need to look into making it simply part of the kit.
Currently, my car is at Stillen due to issues I had post-install. There appear to be two major problems with Stillen's SC kit.
1. Fuel management - the tune appears to have a big problem with fuel. It's definitely not properly managed given the overwhelming number of vehicles that experienced the identical aftermath in short time-periods.
2. Cooling - I've been reading a lot about cooling problems. It seems that the Frozenboost heat-exchanger is the answer to this, but Stillen says it will violate EPA regulations.
My two questions -
1. Who has solved the fuel management issue?
2. How hard would it be for Stillen to get the heat-exchanger emissions approved? Given that the heat-exchanger is a serious necessity, they need to look into making it simply part of the kit.
The following users liked this post:
ANMVQ (02-05-2016)
#14
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
At least the turbo kit has the MAF in the correct spot.
I may got back FI and want a SC kit my choice, and would not buy that kit again, unless they make some serious changes, MAF placement and the heat exchanger to start with.
#15
Registered Member
I wouldn't go that far, There are more than just a "few" that have popped their motors on the kit, Me being one of them. Yes I modded the SC( Impeller) but I had issue before that. Safer than turbo, EH,
At least the turbo kit has the MAF in the correct spot.
I may got back FI and want a SC kit my choice, and would not buy that kit again, unless they make some serious changes, MAF placement and the heat exchanger to start with.
At least the turbo kit has the MAF in the correct spot.
I may got back FI and want a SC kit my choice, and would not buy that kit again, unless they make some serious changes, MAF placement and the heat exchanger to start with.
I wonder if we were to take a poll on how many people have SC kits with no problems and compare it to the % that do what the numbers would be. It would be even more interesting to compare the blown motor % to that of custom turbo installs. My comment was simply to compare the two. I was not saying there is zero risk to SC kits. With a turbo you have a lot more complexity and risk. I personally do not like the idea of sharing engine oil with the turbo. I know lots of guys with turbos who shut off their vehicles after ripping around. Oil superheats, becomes into jello and bad things happen. If you get an oil leak this is also very bad. I had one shop try to sell me a tail mounted turbo and the oil lines would go all the to the back. I laughed. If your waste gate actuator goes you are done, get a hole in you your intercooler, very bad. Aside from the many things that can go wrong a turbo there is the capability for huge TQ and HP. Our VQHR engines are tough and will take 500WHP, but it is easy to get a turbo well above that. The TQ is a whole other matter... I am producing 323TQ with a SC. I know someone with a turbo who is well over 400. High TQ breaks stuff in engines and transmissions. So I still maintain that SC is far safer than turbo on a stock engine. If you have an extra 10-15K to build your motor then for sure go with a turbo. We have an Alpha 7 GT-R in the family. Very fun car to drive. Makes my 443WHP feel slow, and it is 1000 pounds heavier.
Back to the OP issue... I think that where the Stillen kit falls down is the crappy baseline tune they give you. I don't think it is an Osiris problem, and while EcuTek can get around the MAF sensor issues, a well (custom) tuned Stillen kit will produce good power and have good reliability. I have one season on my car with the stillen kit, with aggressive driving, and the only problem I have is with tires Need bigger boots!
The following users liked this post:
DJE44 (03-07-2016)