DS vs D and Range
DS vs D and Range
I've only had my G a few weeks and when not getting on it typically leave it in D. For the past week though I have been using DS for back roads and city streets eventhough I am driving it as lightly as when using D. I figured that with the more aggressive settings of DS and the rev matched downshifting, engine braking and so on that my mlileage would decrease. Strangely, the opposite seems to be happening. In D I watch my range steadily drop, yet in DS it seems to level off or even go up. This is when driving in the same manner in either mode. I am not driving routine routes which let me compare better due to consistency, so have to go by the range (which I have found to be fairly accurate on my car). I haven't been doing much highway travel lately, and still use D there so this is specific to back roads and city. It's a 2010 xS with about 15k so the car is well broken in. Has anyone else observed this?
I'd think the exact opposite - as you did. But I guess it some what makes sense if you consider the "D" mode as being a more conservative driving style mode that's more or less meant to "conserve" your engine. On the contrary, an aggressive map (DS) ups throttle response and decreases lag time; it prevents your car from going in lower gears (7th) to maintain that more aggressive response time. DS essentially decreases engine load and since it remains in a higher gear, it puts less weight on the motor...which ultimately lugs less gas; you don't have to push the car as much when it's more responsive. Does that make sense? Just my 2cents though...don't quote me on that.
I'd think the exact opposite - as you did. But I guess it some what makes sense if you consider the "D" mode as being a more conservative driving style mode that's more or less meant to "conserve" your engine. On the contrary, an aggressive map (DS) ups throttle response and decreases lag time; it prevents your car from going in lower gears (7th) to maintain that more aggressive response time. DS essentially decreases engine load and since it remains in a higher gear, it puts less weight on the motor...which ultimately lugs less gas; you don't have to push the car as much when it's more responsive. Does that make sense? Just my 2cents though...don't quote me on that.
I'd think the exact opposite - as you did. But I guess it some what makes sense if you consider the "D" mode as being a more conservative driving style mode that's more or less meant to "conserve" your engine. On the contrary, an aggressive map (DS) ups throttle response and decreases lag time; it prevents your car from going in lower gears (7th) to maintain that more aggressive response time. DS essentially decreases engine load and since it remains in a higher gear, it puts less weight on the motor...which ultimately lugs less gas; you don't have to push the car as much when it's more responsive. Does that make sense? Just my 2cents though...don't quote me on that.
Trending Topics
I'd like to know how you've driven 15k miles in "a few" weeks. That's alot!
2010 xS w/premium and Nav
The TCM programming for D and DS are the SAME unless you drive "agressively".
If you drive (and brake) "conservatively", you should not be able to tell whether you are in D or DS.
If you drive (and brake) "conservatively", you should not be able to tell whether you are in D or DS.
This is so true. I can't tell the difference but when I reset my ECU, it changes everything.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




