Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G37? Find out the answer in here!

Review Motordyne M370 Manifold Review w/ Comparisons!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 11:30 PM
  #1  
Staples's Avatar
Staples
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 5
From: Bel Air, MD
Motordyne M370 Manifold Review w/ Comparisons!

First off, I want to thank Tony and Motordyne for everything they did to get the manifold out to me in a timely manner. I was fortunate enough to get it shipped from California to Maryland within 3 days.

Now, onto the good stuff! I wanted to personally see this manifold in action and see what the gains were going to be for my current mod list (Fast Intentions exhaust, Fast Intention Res Test Pipes, Stillen G3 Intakes, and Motordyne's Manifold). I had a custom UpRev tune from the get-go from a couple months prior, so I figured the gains were minimal in the beginning, but I still wanted to bite the bullet and see what the capabilities of this plenum were.

Broken down are multiple sheets to give you an idea of what type of gains were seen before we started tuning the vehicle and after (now remember, the car came in with a custom tune already).

This first sheet describes the Horsepower / Torque gains through 4 different runs. Runfile 001, 002 are both baseline pulls when we slapped the car on the dyno to see what it put down in comparison to after the plenum was installed.

Runfile 001 - Baseline
Runfile 002 - Baseline

Runfile 010 - Motordyne M370 w/ 12.8 Air/Fuel ratio
Runfile 011 -Motordyne M370 w/ 13.0 Air/Fuel ratio



The car seems to really like the extra fuel. We gained an extra 2whp just making the minor change of adding fuel closer to redline to get the car as close to top-end as possible. With comparing run 002, and 010 the gains were pretty good. We saw positives gains all throughout the powerband except for 7400 - redline (lost 1 - 2whp, no biggie).

From 4500 - 5500 - there were gains of 12whp, and 12ft-lbs of torque

From 5500 - 6200 4whp and 6ft-lbs

From 6300 - 6900 6whp and 7 ft-lbs

The rest were minimal gains with a minor loss at redline. The car had a pretty good amount of heatsoak since were making consistent runs to change minor things like timing and fuel so the torque would have been even higher if we let the car cool down for 15 minutes (it was getting late).

Here are run graph comparisons that Tony was ever so kind to export:








We didn't really do consistent runs at the end because it was getting late, so I didn't have the time to let the ECU fully adjust to the new fuel curves. I can tell you though that my butt dyno feels the kick, I know for a fact that isn't a placebo effect either.

All in all I'm really happy with the outcome. I'm glad it made more power over-top my other mods and tune. I would definitely buy this all over again!
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 11:33 PM
  #2  
WPPJR30's Avatar
WPPJR30
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 53
From: New England
Nice review.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 11:34 PM
  #3  
Staples's Avatar
Staples
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 5
From: Bel Air, MD
Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 11:41 PM
  #4  
911turbo's Avatar
911turbo
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 42
From: Biloxi, MS
any pictures?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 11:41 PM
  #5  
xyz's Avatar
xyz
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
wow . . . thanks for the info.

looks like pretty good gains on tq on the mid-range. . . where this engine needs the most . . .
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 12:28 AM
  #6  
Staples's Avatar
Staples
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 5
From: Bel Air, MD
Originally Posted by 911turbo
any pictures?
Pictures aren't really necessary since it's pretty much a modified stock manifold. The only difference is the Motordyne engine cover, but you could still use the Infiniti cover if you wanted to.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 12:48 AM
  #7  
wakeboardr116's Avatar
wakeboardr116
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 12
From: Oklahoma
Those TQ numbers look really nice. You wouldn't happen to have the actual dyno run files (.drf files) to upload would you?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 12:52 AM
  #8  
Staples's Avatar
Staples
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 5
From: Bel Air, MD
Originally Posted by wakeboardr116
Those TQ numbers look really nice. You wouldn't happen to have the actual dyno run files (.drf files) to upload would you?
I do, if you're interested in them... PM me your email.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 01:25 AM
  #9  
advan37's Avatar
advan37
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 425
Likes: 4
From: UAE
Nice review man .
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 01:38 AM
  #10  
G37HKS's Avatar
G37HKS
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 506
Likes: 3
From: Dubai
gratz staples, though i saw ur post earlier in other forum,

i was torn about this mod gains tq more than hp, but hmm it seems that im right..

i cant wait to see how this manifold will perform with F.I cars
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 01:40 AM
  #11  
Staples's Avatar
Staples
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 5
From: Bel Air, MD
Originally Posted by JimmiesG
gratz staples, though i saw ur post earlier in other forum,

i was torn about this mod gains tq more than hp, but hmm it seems that im right..

i cant wait to see how this manifold will perform with F.I cars
I think I'm going to pull the trigger and go with the STS rear mounted single turbo setup. I'm working out the logistics with STS as we speak.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 01:45 AM
  #12  
G37HKS's Avatar
G37HKS
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 506
Likes: 3
From: Dubai
i wouldnt recommend that system..

i mean,.. I never heard of such a thing before lool..

in logic way, if this system was good then some factories would release their cars with turbo system like that one (STS)

just go with GTM TT
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 02:23 AM
  #13  
rAiN's Avatar
rAiN
Registered Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 24
Originally Posted by Staples
I think I'm going to pull the trigger and go with the STS rear mounted single turbo setup. I'm working out the logistics with STS as we speak.

mmmm sound of STS is AMAZING
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 02:31 AM
  #14  
cvt's Avatar
cvt
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
nice gains...looks like power all through the band. reminds me of the kind of gains tony did for rev-up DE engines.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #15  
Kidcane's Avatar
Kidcane
Florida G Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,105
Likes: 9
From: Tampa
Interesting. My friend with a 370 did not make out as well with this mod.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 PM.