Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G37? Find out the answer in here!

MoTec ECU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 04:08 PM
  #1  
G37HKS's Avatar
G37HKS
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 506
Likes: 3
From: Dubai
MoTec ECU

Hey guys.. can we install Motec ECU on VVEL engine? or it dont have that technology to handle the VVEL?

im thinking of modding my car then throw a MoTec M600 on it but still not sure if it can fit with VVEL.. any1 know?
so my question is can i replace my stock ecu to Motec M600?

Last edited by G37HKS; Jul 19, 2009 at 03:35 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #2  
sharif@forged's Avatar
sharif@forged
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, GA
You can literally do anything you want with the Motec. Might as well just max out lift on the VVEL, and not even mess with it. The main reason for VVEL, is emmissions and fuel economy, not all out performance. One of the reason the GT-R doesnt have VVEL.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #3  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
I would answer, but Sharif summed it up
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #4  
oOmikeyboy's Avatar
oOmikeyboy
Florida G35 Club, Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
So does that mean VVEL is a hindrance rather than a good thing for performance?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 04:58 PM
  #5  
sharif@forged's Avatar
sharif@forged
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by oOmikeyboy
So does that mean VVEL is a hindrance rather than a good thing for performance?
It adds weight, and significant added complexity, but I don't think I would call it a hindrance.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #6  
SOLISIMO's Avatar
SOLISIMO
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 0
From: SOUTH FLORIDA
Originally Posted by sharif@forged
It adds weight, and significant added complexity, but I don't think I would call it a hindrance.
Sounds like a pain in the azz to me
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #7  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
On paper, it is superior to traditional variable valve timing, since it is infinitely variable. The question is, how tunable is it?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #8  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,173
Likes: 244
From: Doha, Qatar
Now I'm thinking, how hard would it be to get rid of the whole vvel system lol
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 11:19 PM
  #9  
sharif@forged's Avatar
sharif@forged
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by G37Sam
Now I'm thinking, how hard would it be to get rid of the whole vvel system lol
Unfortunately, it's rediculous integrated into the cylinder head. But one could easily max it out, but a full standalone would be required, as the engine would otherwise go into a limp mode loop. yeah!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 01:36 AM
  #10  
chamelieon's Avatar
chamelieon
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by sharif@forged
Unfortunately, it's rediculous integrated into the cylinder head. But one could easily max it out, but a full standalone would be required, as the engine would otherwise go into a limp mode loop. yeah!
hmmm how would u know that? u holding something out from us ?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 07:39 AM
  #11  
AussieV36's Avatar
AussieV36
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
would the VVEL get in the way for eg if an air/fuel piggyback controller were to be used?
ie; could it trigger limp mode if it senses a change in a/f ratio from the controller
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #12  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,173
Likes: 244
From: Doha, Qatar
I know someone who installed a piggyback UniChip to adjust his A/F and Ignition timing in Dubai and his car worked fine so I'm guessing you should be too
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #13  
shumby's Avatar
shumby
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 5
From: With your mom
ya but chipping a camel is way different then chipping a G
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #14  
sharif@forged's Avatar
sharif@forged
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by AussieV36
would the VVEL get in the way for eg if an air/fuel piggyback controller were to be used?
ie; could it trigger limp mode if it senses a change in a/f ratio from the controller
Nope you will be there there.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #15  
jran76's Avatar
jran76
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
I am pretty sure the VVEL is controlled by a separate ECU. Adding a Motec or any other piggyback or stand-alone will do nothing to the VVEL. I have a feeling you will see a VVEL controller popping up in the near future. Now the CVTC system is controlled by the ECU (just like older VQ's-- this controls cam phasing). Lift, duration, overlap, etc. are all part of the VVEL system, and will require a controller for the VVEL system or some type of mechanical adjustments to change.

You would have to scrap the entire head, and make some serious electrical and sensor changes to get rid of the VVEL. The head on the VQ37VHR is completely un-serviceable per Nissan. If something goes wrong, the entire head will be replaced. It is nearly impossible to replace the intake cams due to mechanical complexities, and the exhaust cams would take some major work unlike any set of cams currently available. In theory you could use the head off another HR series VQ engine, but there are some obvious drawbacks and issues in doing so.

On our VVEL system, duration and lift adjustments can be made with adjustment screws on the head (intake side only, the exhaust side will require new cams to change duration and lift). These adjustments are pretty complex and will require fixtures and jigs to do so. All other variables are controlled by the VVEL ECU (controller). The most important part of this is valve movement (this also greatly affects throttle response). Cam phasing is part of the CVTC system, which in theory can be controller by the ECU.

If you really care about this stuff, I would highly recommend reading the following article: http://www.370z.com/MagazineArticles...akthrough.aspx

There is a lot of mis-information out there about the VVEL system, and the above article should clear it up....

Last edited by jran76; Jul 22, 2009 at 02:25 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.