When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So we are only looking at a 22 or so HP difference. But the A/F ratio is better and the Torque is more smoothed out. Along with total gains on the HP not, low on the mid and high in the high RPM or what ever... it is all smoothed out.
Both are the same dyno. The second picture are numbers that are what it would look like if it was done on a Dyno Jet. Since dynos measure differently the second pic is for a better representation of a Dyno Jet comparison. They are both the same graphs.
So we are only looking at a 22 or so HP difference. But the A/F ratio is better and the Torque is more smoothed out. Along with total gains on the HP not, low on the mid and high in the high RPM or what ever... it is all smoothed out.
so you got 22 hp with a ECU retune and Intake and HFC and Exhaust? or 22hp on top of the gains from HFC intake and catback?
Yeah the max gains aren't really seen, but the graph as a whole is a lot better. With the tuning the there are no ups and downs... just ups. And the Throttle response is A LOT better. Even with TDC on.
Last edited by Dieseldoug22; 04-23-2008 at 09:23 PM.
I know the numbers don't add up right. The plus 22 wasn't off the best pull it was off the third pull. The real question is on what pulls did the IT article take the readings. At Tsquare they did it after the car was warmed up not with a cold engine. I think I read before how someone did three pulls and the numbers were different there. I think they said the results got worse.
04-23-2008, 08:55 PM
