Site Feedback & Suggestions For posting feedback and suggestions regarding MyG37.com

pics in threads resized

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #16  
DiamondGCoupe's Avatar
DiamondGCoupe
Administrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,272
Likes: 20
From: FL CA TX
Why should EVERYONE be subjected to viewing images in large formats like 1024X768? If I want to see a larger version of a picture that's posted, I'll click it and let a new window launch. It's win win. Good game.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:29 PM
  #17  
SantiagoDraco's Avatar
SantiagoDraco
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: ATX
First off 1024 is hardly a large format nor is it "subjecting" anyone to some kind of outrageous level of pain.

Secondly the resize code in the site is something that could very easily be made available as an option in a user's profile (something I suggested earlier in the thread I believe).

This is a usability feature and the reason people are asking about it (those that might care and feel like asking) is simply because the process of having to click images to open new windows is not user friendly for everyone (not as user friendly as if those images were simply displayed larger in the page).

The best option, if it's something the site admin/coder was willing to add, would simply be a user profile setting that configures the optional maximum display size for the embedded image and that value would be pulled from the users settings like other profile options are.

If everyone agree's that it's 1) cannot be accomplished 2) not worth caring about or 3) whatever, then fine. But saying it's just the way it is seems a bit dismissive since it's pretty much all the time we have to click images and open new windows when it might not always be necessary. It also makes it harder to compare before/after shots that are quite often embedded in these pages.

Just my $200 worth
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #18  
Keng's Avatar
Keng
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
1024x768 is not large, my camera takes photo in 3888x2592 lol
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #19  
SantiagoDraco's Avatar
SantiagoDraco
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: ATX
Originally Posted by bboysteele
I don't believe you can. They do this so the page loads quicker especially for people on slower connections.
Didn't really see your post earlier. Actually the site is loading the larger images and resizing dynamically, so it's not a bandwidth reduction function. Just fyi.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #20  
tekknikal's Avatar
tekknikal
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Caribbean
any update? or way to turn this off? or plans to do so?

i see you all are running google analytics.
please check how many of your users really run 800x600 resolution
im willing to bet that its under 10%- and declining as more and more upgrade
is what you're doing fair to the other 90%?
i also think it's only discouraging traffic; people don't browse the internet looking for sites with low res pics. jmho though...
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #21  
DiamondGCoupe's Avatar
DiamondGCoupe
Administrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,272
Likes: 20
From: FL CA TX
No.

If you click on a picture it will open up to its full resolution.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #22  
SantiagoDraco's Avatar
SantiagoDraco
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: ATX
Originally Posted by DiamondGCoupe
No.

If you click on a picture it will open up to its full resolution.
Translation: We don't want to listen or change.

This is one of the reasons I rarely visit this site anymore. It's this kind of attitude towards your members that is a complete and total turn off.

It's also why I changed my plans on contributing as a premier member.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #23  
Keng's Avatar
Keng
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
I am for removing that script also. Clicking on just about every photo gets old
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #24  
palinka's Avatar
palinka
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 71
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Keng
I am for removing that script also. Clicking on just about every photo gets old
agreed
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #25  
Kidcane's Avatar
Kidcane
Florida G Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,105
Likes: 9
From: Tampa
Its a mutiny!!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #26  
GodZilla's Avatar
GodZilla
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Japan
I run dual monitors at 1600 x 1200 and I still dont like the image to be full size when loading.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #27  
B L U E S L A T E's Avatar
B L U E S L A T E
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
G35Driver.com does not do this and I like it that way so much better...
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #28  
cmjman's Avatar
cmjman
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
change the script!! drives me nuts too.. 1920x1200 resolution here.. 800 is not even half of my screen
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #29  
bboysteele's Avatar
bboysteele
Premier Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,346
Likes: 3
From: Colorado Springs, CO
We need to make it smaller. I say go with 400X300. The pics are way to big... lol
Reply
Old May 27, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #30  
GodZilla's Avatar
GodZilla
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Japan
just bumped the size..
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 AM.