G37 Sedan

Q50 Review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2013 | 04:24 PM
  #16  
sniper27's Avatar
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 79
From: S. Cal
Originally Posted by blackfunk
They did net 1city/3Hwy miles - thats quite an improvement. Believe me when I say it but DSG has its own issues. Not sure it would make an acceptable replacement for most of Infiniti's target audience.
meh...i have yet to hit the mpg claims of the G. i wouldn't be so happy about the Q's yet.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2013 | 04:51 PM
  #17  
blackfunk's Avatar
blackfunk
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 480
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by sniper27
meh...i have yet to hit the mpg claims of the G. i wouldn't be so happy about the Q's yet.
Now you're 1city and 3hwy closer to that target LOL
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2013 | 08:05 PM
  #18  
ilyas's Avatar
ilyas
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 61
Likes: 3
I had a VW with DSG. Stock, it shifts slower than our 7AT, and is just horrible in traffic. Absolutely the worst transmission I've ever had. And don't say this is a 'preference' - this is just a fact that DSG transmission sucks in stop/go traffic, especially moving 5-20mph increments.

I think Q50 should be interesting to test drive, although the interior is clearly worse than the new IS. In my opinion, of course.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 12:51 AM
  #19  
sniper27's Avatar
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 79
From: S. Cal
Originally Posted by ilyas
I had a VW with DSG. Stock, it shifts slower than our 7AT, and is just horrible in traffic. Absolutely the worst transmission I've ever had. And don't say this is a 'preference' - this is just a fact that DSG transmission sucks in stop/go traffic, especially moving 5-20mph increments.

I think Q50 should be interesting to test drive, although the interior is clearly worse than the new IS. In my opinion, of course.
I drive our Audi A3 with DSG in stop and go L.A. traffic all the time and it is beautiful. Way better than the G's jerky and laggy 7AT.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 10:18 AM
  #20  
Adam West's Avatar
Adam West
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 930
Likes: 38
Originally Posted by 328HP
0-60 5.5
1/4 13.7@102

2014 Infiniti Q50 Full Test on Edmunds.com

I have not been here for a while but thought you may like to see this. Edmunds also had the 328i at
0-60 5.4
1/4 13.8@97ish
You beat me to posting this up :-)
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 11:36 AM
  #21  
ilyas's Avatar
ilyas
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 61
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by sniper27
I drive our Audi A3 with DSG in stop and go L.A. traffic all the time and it is beautiful. Way better than the G's jerky and laggy 7AT.
Not sure how you think the 7at is jerky compared to a DSG. I feel the exact opposite. I made it barely over 1 month on my VW CC DSG before getting rid of the car, mainly because of the very laggy and jerky DSG. Had it looked at by 3 dealerships and test drove other DSG vehicles - all felt similar. GTI exhibited these problems to a lesser extent, but they were still there. It feels like a handicapped manual with an inexperienced driver.

Just what I felt. I've never driven an Audi with DSG - maybe it's tuned very differently. My VW DSG experience was horrible.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 01:41 PM
  #22  
nisslover's Avatar
nisslover
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 222
Likes: 19
Any type of transmissions can be bad...
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 02:53 PM
  #23  
John B's Avatar
John B
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 202
Likes: 19
I saw it in person and I'm sorry, that is not that great looking of a car. The back looks like a Hyundai and will my 6mt sport sedan clutch could be a little better. I love the car and I think it looks better personally. Then looking from the rear the 225's look like bicycle tires. This car was not well thought out. I imagine they will put a new motor out next year because this car should be running mid 4 sec. 0-60. A 328i should not be its competitor. The S4 and 335I are.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 03:59 PM
  #24  
sniper27's Avatar
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 79
From: S. Cal
Originally Posted by ilyas
Not sure how you think the 7at is jerky compared to a DSG. I feel the exact opposite. I made it barely over 1 month on my VW CC DSG before getting rid of the car, mainly because of the very laggy and jerky DSG. Had it looked at by 3 dealerships and test drove other DSG vehicles - all felt similar. GTI exhibited these problems to a lesser extent, but they were still there. It feels like a handicapped manual with an inexperienced driver.

Just what I felt. I've never driven an Audi with DSG - maybe it's tuned very differently. My VW DSG experience was horrible.
The G's 7AT has jerky downshifts and laggy upshifts in traffic. Now, with the software update, it helps, but doesn't completely fix the issue. The DSG shifts are instant. And it is so smooth that I wouldn't even know it shifted if i wasn't looking at the RPM or listen to the motor. I have no issues with the DSG in traffic. And in L.A., it's a nightmare as eveyone knows.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 04:07 PM
  #25  
sniper27's Avatar
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 79
From: S. Cal
Saw these 2 at the dealership yesterday. They tried to make it look better with 20 in aftermarket wheels, but it's still just ok. Still looks overstyled with too much chrome. Interior is nice, but honestly, it's not THAT world of a difference.

Name:  Glendale-20130719-00987_zpsb7497b47.jpg
Views: 223
Size:  115.0 KB
Name:  Glendale-20130719-00988_zps4c55bc95.jpg
Views: 803
Size:  114.5 KB
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 04:16 PM
  #26  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,876
Likes: 4,950
Thanks for the pics Sniper, the top pic looks alright but the bottom pic shows the Qs jowls and not in a good way
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 04:21 PM
  #27  
g37guy01's Avatar
g37guy01
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 15
From: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Originally Posted by John B
I saw it in person and I'm sorry, that is not that great looking of a car. The back looks like a Hyundai and will my 6mt sport sedan clutch could be a little better. I love the car and I think it looks better personally. Then looking from the rear the 225's look like bicycle tires. This car was not well thought out. I imagine they will put a new motor out next year because this car should be running mid 4 sec. 0-60. A 328i should not be its competitor. The S4 and 335I are.
It looks like a Hyundai because Hyundai copied elements of the design. I like the styling of the Q50. To each their own I guess.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 08:49 PM
  #28  
firstinfiniti's Avatar
firstinfiniti
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 83
Likes: 2
I just test drove a non-hybrid. I don't cant remember if it was the sport or not. This is MY review.

First the styling. I looks much better in person and in certain colors. They need to offer 18s as standard because the 17 inchers look really small and don't fill up wheel well at all. At all. Spacers are a must if you run the 17s. The 19s look much better and are pretty much required for the car to look attractive (subjective). The front grille could be smaller (would look right at home on ... the QX56). The front overhang ruins the side profile a bit. The front lights look badass; the rears already look dated for some reason.

The interior is definitely a step up from the G. Much better quality and better plastics. Reminded me of the M37 I was sitting in while I as waiting to drive the Q.

Now the drive. I started off with everything in the sportiest setting. The car sounds way more refined. You can tell it is the same engine/transmission combo though. The engine is quite hushed now and the 7AT felt smoother but it felt "familiar" at the same time. The suspension soaked up the bumps better, even with the 19s, which was a pleasant surprise. No suspension crashing whatsoever. And then there is the steering. Too each their own but there is no way I would buy this car with this super artificial steering system. It is probably F1 quick. You think and you're in the other lane. I like quick steering but it was quite excessive. I pulled over and put the steering setting in the lightest, least sportiest settings and that's how I drove the rest of the time. The steering adjusts for lightness and speed. The problem is you cant have the slowest setting with the heavier settings. I wanted weight without the lightening quick response. I hope this steering system was part of an option because that would be a deal breaker for me. Apart from that, the car feels very well planted. It definitely feels like a premium sedan now. Its supposed to be lighter but I couldn't tell.

I walked away disappointed with the car in the same way I was disappointed with the latest 3 series. You can clearly see the main focus of these cars. I guess the time has come that you need to buy a sports car and a family sedan separately.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 09:02 PM
  #29  
sniper27's Avatar
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 79
From: S. Cal
Originally Posted by blnewt
Thanks for the pics Sniper, the top pic looks alright but the bottom pic shows the Qs jowls and not in a good way
The bottom is a Sport and the top is just a premium.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2013 | 09:06 PM
  #30  
sniper27's Avatar
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 79
From: S. Cal
Originally Posted by g37guy01
It looks like a Hyundai because Hyundai copied elements of the design. I like the styling of the Q50. To each their own I guess.
So the rear looks like a Sonata because Hyundai copied elements from Infiniti a few years before the Q50 came out?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.