Infiniti not sure if the want to TT the new IPL or just up the power*
#18
Registered Member
Thread Starter
I think it points to them trying to satisfy the "M3" enthusiast crowd. We may be on the bleeding edge of this crowd, but it applies to us nonetheless!
#20
Administrator
Share the link with us, this way we can all vote yes and have them build a 400hp G!
#21
Registered Member
Thread Starter
That and the residual isn't much higher than a G37s loaded, so I can't imagine it'll be smart to return vs. buyout, even stock.
Last edited by wattles; 09-08-2012 at 03:11 PM.
#22
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
I really want a GTR and am working towards getting one after the G, but an Infiniti version would be the nuts! There is nothing wrong with Nissan having a "GTR" in both car lines. IMO
GM has the ZR1, the Cadillac CTS-V and the Camaro ZL1 which have similar running gear, different price ranges and different levels of comfort/performance. And they are selling all of them. Nissan should look at that.
GM has the ZR1, the Cadillac CTS-V and the Camaro ZL1 which have similar running gear, different price ranges and different levels of comfort/performance. And they are selling all of them. Nissan should look at that.
#25
Registered Member
Thread Starter
I agree that the G shifts slow, even in DS or manual. This is a design of the "luxury" feel of the car I'm sure. I would prefer more response, but I'm not into tooth-cracking, hard shifts either.
#26
I agree a 60k IPL would compete directly with a M3/S5, etc. Since the M3 is already 414hp, I think the IPL would need closer to 450hp or it will be a step behind the competition when it's introduced, and even farther behind when these cars are updated. Plus, a 450hp IPL would not encroach on the GTR since its hp will be bumped in a couple years to high 500's or even 600hp.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gammamotors
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
44
12-31-2015 12:48 AM
tomro99
Private Classifieds
6
11-17-2015 02:08 AM