Swift-R Springs Installed! PICS!
May fit, but may not give the same drop and/or ride quality.
Since they now have the springs for the X Sedan I would bet they have them for the X Coupe.
Send them an email...they are quick to respond.
Since they now have the springs for the X Sedan I would bet they have them for the X Coupe.
Send them an email...they are quick to respond.
Last edited by tejasg37x; Jan 5, 2012 at 02:45 PM.
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
I measured from ground to fender again today and the drop is now 26 1/2 rear (same) and 27 1/4 front (about 1/8th lower). It's been 9 days
I was told and I read that these springs allow you to retain stock shocks. No need to change shocks or get an alignment. They supposedly keep the shocks within specs which is probably why these springs are progressive and is another reason why I went with the Swift Springs.
I measured from ground to fender again today and the drop is now 26 1/2 rear (same) and 27 1/4 front (about 1/8th lower). It's been 9 days
I measured from ground to fender again today and the drop is now 26 1/2 rear (same) and 27 1/4 front (about 1/8th lower). It's been 9 days
I believed that when they advertised, less coils, and not progressive.
I now see they are progressive, and the spring rate is actually higher than Eibach springs.
.
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
Well after much searching online I have come to the conclusion that these springs are NOT progressive. Here is what I found.
"These springs are not progressive, they are a linnear spring that simply takes up slack in the shock, due to a shorter spring. The progressive ends should be fully collapsed with the weight of the car. Also the spring rates were made to be within the stock shocks valving. So I'm sure only so much can be done"
I did email Swift asking to clarify this for us. But from the picture above I can see that the spring is probably colapsed at the progressive point.
Source: Swift Spec R - 2008 EVO X Review/Install/Pics - EvoXForums.com - Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X Forums Post #9
"These springs are not progressive, they are a linnear spring that simply takes up slack in the shock, due to a shorter spring. The progressive ends should be fully collapsed with the weight of the car. Also the spring rates were made to be within the stock shocks valving. So I'm sure only so much can be done"
I did email Swift asking to clarify this for us. But from the picture above I can see that the spring is probably colapsed at the progressive point.
Source: Swift Spec R - 2008 EVO X Review/Install/Pics - EvoXForums.com - Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X Forums Post #9
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 341
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, Texas
OK I finally got a response from Swift:
Those are the correct springs. And yes they are linear. The progressive portion of those springs act as a helper spring and they are fully collapsed at static height.
In creating lowering springs the spring would obviously have to be shorter, and then on top of that we have increased the spring rates a significant amount as well. This in turn will make the spring so short that it will play around in the shock, especially going up driveways or speedbumps. To fix this we have this portion of the spring act like a helper spring, just like what you would see on a coilover setup. These springs are a linear spring on the vehicle.
If you have any other questions please let us know, or if you contact us at the number below.
Thank you for purchasing our springs!



