All i can say and have been saying .It was no 757-200 .I know planes ,i have lived near the airport for over 20 years.I watch them at the park landing.When devon lek junior dale and i met in blocktober fest i came by the pentagon and right by the hotel .There is no way a novice pilot even skilled coud crash a plane into a building about 50 feet tall when the plane is about that tall without hitting the ground in a little field ,Between building.Where is all the debris ,all i saw was a single hole .Doesn't add up. All the video did was mke me not believe even more.The video i saw showed and object in the distance about 150 yds away smaller than the security gate.Even at 500 yards away a 757 would have been larger than a 3ft security gate.

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/03/0...agon.pictures/

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero...erreurs_en.htm

 

Big B, these things are so ridiculous. The plane went in at an angle. It only hit the ground floor because the Pentagon is a very WIDE, not tall building. People saw the plane going into it. My mom knew 4 people that died on the plane. Its not made up. Get over it.

 

Not saying i wasn't a type of plane but no large comercial plane.It is impossible for a plane 3 to 4 stories tall to only hit a building on the first floor.This thing was skimming the groung with no damage to the lawn common you think about it. I live near the airport.Could n't happen .I got a few ideas on what couylda happened though.

 

okay if the plane hit it at an angle what angle would you bee talking about. the plane that hit the world trade center almost cut the building in half at impact. The damage done to the pentagon is so minimal. Besides i wouldnt put it pass our Gov to cover up what really happen. Maybe the plane had crashed somewhere else and they used the that as a cover up for what happend to the pentagon.

 

+1 Pratik, Seriously. Good thing there we so many cameras on the WTC or else there would be all kinds of conspiracy theories on them too. This 'question' has been around for years. If it wasn't a plane what was it? What happened to all the people that never returned home that were on that flight? Why in the world would anyone want to cover up what the Pentagon was hit with. Doesn't pass the 'common sense' test for me. The plane hit the Pentagon. It was a terrible tragedy. I hope nothing like this ever happens again.

 

The Pentagon is built like a rock unlike the WTC. The width of destruction on the WTC was probably relative. Those buildings werent very wide. They just crashed because of the burning of the beams.

Nowadays its ahrd for the gov't to cover up things of this magnitude. Im not saying they dont however in the age of watching 24 and other shows, people get these conspiracy theories on what really happened. To cover up another plane going down somewhere else isnt realistic. Word would have been leaked by now or it would be the biggest cover-up in recent memory.

 

yea it was a terrible tragedy and should and shall not happen again, but i still dont like the fact that so much evidence is missing....besided who really saw the plane hit the building....wasnt it like just a handful of ppl and maybe some scared citizens forced to tell the Gov side of the story? but who knows....lets just put the conspiracy theory to rest, be americans and blame the damn terrorist

 

not going to mention too much detail, but a good friend of mine works for the gov in the not so obvious portion to the public, but lets just say large maginitude distructions happen all the time and its never been put on the news. get my drift

 

Common common sense is take off the blinders.I never said that the world trade wasn't a plane but thats a hole nother story.That is scandelous too.But what can travel at that speed all around the world guided by gps.Hmn at low altitude earth orbit not Micheal Jordan .We have all kinds of things ask Mohmar Kadaffi,Sadam Hussein.Just asking to open your eyes.What happend to the hotel footage .You aint gonna see that..Oh pearl harbor we new the planes where comming .People dissapear all the time .It was also tested that on one of the flights people where on the cell phone at high alltititudes .It was tested that almost 99 percent that cell phone don't work at the attlitudes tested .Go figure .Some of us are a little to trustworthy .I guess that you don't think we are paying a fair price for gas..Oh where are the WMDs Iguess saddam still hidding them ..up his butt peace.

 

I'm still shocked people think this is a conspiracy yet amazed how low that plane was flow.

 

Thank you for your opinion.It was a terrible tradegy.But them releasing the video after they had it almost 6 years .Plenty of time to edit it.Was it top secret.It was a accident.What happened to 200 tons of wreckage no seats no wings.Oh a passport survives but 200 tongs of metal evaporate.I'm sorry.
That all i'm gonna say.

 

Big B, im not saying the gov't doesnt cover up stuff, however these theories exist on many levels. Was JFK really shot, did we really land on the moon? Everyone has a theory.

Regardless as for the cell phone, if you mean Flight 93, cell phones DO work on airplanes for the most part (altitude plays a factor of course).

http://www.isa.org/InTechTemplate.cf...ContentID=3309

Didnt you see Jack Bauer making calls when he was down in the luggage compartment

 

this video was already in that "loose change 2" conspiracy documentary that was on this forum. in my opinion, looks more like a missle than a plane.

 

Ok gov't cover ups yes,Kennedy shot yes,cell phone high alttitudes no.we know terrorist where here yes .Did we stop them no.a HUGE *** Plane hit the ground in a small little field without touching the ground by a novice pilot at 600 like they say in between building no.

 

i have never gotten coverage on any cell phone carrier on a plane above a couple hundred feet.