EVO MR vs CAYMAN S
I'd take the Cayman in a heartbeat. Much better looks, great motor and suspension (mid engine is great for handling).
The EVO has great numbers. But it's damn ugly. TOO ugly imho. I guess if I wanted a car that had great performance and I didn't care if it got scratched/banged up a bit if I drove it where it was DESIGNED to be driven, then I'd nod toward the EVO. But I can't get past the truely hideous Lancer looks.
The EVO has great numbers. But it's damn ugly. TOO ugly imho. I guess if I wanted a car that had great performance and I didn't care if it got scratched/banged up a bit if I drove it where it was DESIGNED to be driven, then I'd nod toward the EVO. But I can't get past the truely hideous Lancer looks.
Then what is this thread about exactly? Exactly what should we be discussing here?
That the EVO handles as well as the Cayman? Okay. The vid already shows that
That the EVO handles as well as the Cayman? Okay. The vid already shows that
Originally Posted by Mase4g63
This thread has nothing to do with the LOOK of either car. It obviously shows a video of the Evo and Cayman S in road course.
Premier Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,923
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Originally Posted by pdjafari
my argument was not picking a G over an Evo if it was free. my point is simple. any car or even a cardboard box can be made faster than both a G and an Evo. but the fact is what just b/c my cardboard box outperforms ur G w/ GT emblems doesnt mean i would rather have the cardboard box. just b/c the evo is faster than a ferrari, who would really pick a Evo over the ferrari?? anyone who would is completely stupid and should be shot on sight. id take the ferrari, sell it buy a house and another car....common sense...
