Motorsports / Track Th ultimate forum to discuss motorsports / track related topics for your G37.

Drag Racing last night

Old Aug 30, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #16  
T-rek2's Avatar
T-rek2
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: montreal, canada
Originally Posted by Hawaiian72099
One of the guys at the track was telling me to launch it at 3K, but I was going off of what some other guys on this forum were saying. Like they said that the test driven G's got better times from not reving it up at all, and also some guys were saying that if you rev up you are only building up heat in the tranny and will cause lower times. I would rev it up to 3K but the only thing I am worried about is the tranny and if it can handle it. Is this bad for the tranny or is it ok to do just not under everyday driving?

Thanks again guys for all the info!
Look how i see it is going to the drag strip is bad for the car i do it very little, each time you go your hurting the car somewhat.I know for manual it is bad for sure, but auto maybe it is bad for the tranny not sure to be honest. I have done the rev to 3k many times and nothing hapenned and if something does i'll put it under warranty lol . But i got better times doing it that way, i find it shortens the lag that the car has in the begining. From stand still i find the car to be lagy on first gear up until 4k.

Last edited by T-rek2; Aug 30, 2008 at 09:41 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #17  
Geepers's Avatar
Geepers
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: LONG ISLAND NEW YORK
It's a car......
Enjoy it!
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #18  
Hawaiian72099's Avatar
Hawaiian72099
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: Ewa Beach, Hawaii and Guam
Originally Posted by T-rek2
Look how i see it is going to the drag strip is bad for the car i do it very little, each time you go your hurting the car somewhat.I know for manual it is bad for sure, but auto maybe it is bad for the tranny not sure to be honest. I have done the rev to 3k many times and nothing hapenned and if something does i'll put it under warranty lol . But i got better times doing it that way, i find it shortens the lag that the car has in the begining. From stand still i find the car to be lagy on first gear up until 4k.
I know what your saying, it was lagy at first but when the car got moving it wouldn't stop because it has so much power at the top end but very little on the bottom. My other friend who had an STI didn't know he needed a helmet and fire proof jacket if he was running faster than a 13.4. His car actually ran low 12s, but since he had no helmet he launched his at 1 or 2 K instead of his normal 3-4K and his reaction time was 1.09 but still ran a 13.7! I ran with him when he did 13.7 and he said my car at high speed was still pulling hard and he had a hard time catching up.

Originally Posted by Geepers
It's a car......Enjoy it!
I did, but I will even more next time!
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 01:47 AM
  #19  
myk1013's Avatar
myk1013
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 19
From: Northside, Isle of Guam
Sounds like you had a blast man!
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 01:55 AM
  #20  
Keng's Avatar
Keng
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hawaiian72099
Not positive on the exact number but on the attached pic from Maps.com. We were at the northern tip of Guam and if I am reading it right, we were at around 10000 feet. Would that make a difference? Not sure of the exact humidity but it was really hot with no wind if that helps. I was actually posting good times compared to some other close to stock cars. My friend has a bone stock 07 WRX and he was putting down 14.7s and some mustang was running 16-17 secs. Most of the cars that were not in the competition were posting in the 15s. I was told by someone at the track, that because of the conditions on Guam you are suppose to take off almost a full sec of your time. Not sure if that is true or not either.
The highest place on Guam is 2000 feet at most. Where are you reading the 10000 feet?
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #21  
Hawaiian72099's Avatar
Hawaiian72099
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: Ewa Beach, Hawaii and Guam
Originally Posted by myk1013
Sounds like you had a blast man!
Yea bro we did hopefully your not working next time.

Originally Posted by Keng
The highest place on Guam is 2000 feet at most. Where are you reading the 10000 feet?
Check post #8. I just got it from maps.com I probably just read the map wrong. I'm not from here bro so I just went off of that, sorry i am am not a demographic genius.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #22  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
KAHBOOM
Super Moderator of Pwnage
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 195
From: NC
Save the heat humidity and altitude and you would likely be around 13.8 or 13.9

The biggest issue with brake torquing is heat build up. In the winter time you may get a way with it a little more. But when it's already extremely hot out- just slam the pedal and go or don't power brake for more than 2 or 3 seconds.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #23  
TerribleONE453's Avatar
TerribleONE453
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 5
From: Chatsworth CA
a stock STI running 12s... that cant be right
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 03:37 PM
  #24  
Hawaiian72099's Avatar
Hawaiian72099
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: Ewa Beach, Hawaii and Guam
Originally Posted by TerribleONE453
a stock STI running 12s... that cant be right
No man far from stock
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #25  
TerribleONE453's Avatar
TerribleONE453
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 5
From: Chatsworth CA
ohh i swear i read a stock STI.. lol
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #26  
Hawaiian72099's Avatar
Hawaiian72099
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: Ewa Beach, Hawaii and Guam
Originally Posted by TerribleONE453
ohh i swear i read a stock STI.. lol
Yea some of what I wrote is a little confusing, but there 2 different WRXs out there. One 07 bone stock and 04 STI highly modified.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 05:11 AM
  #27  
ucla bruin's Avatar
ucla bruin
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 3
From: Orange County
The northern tip of Guam is no higher than 1000ft on the map you attached.

Glad you're having fun.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #28  
skaterbasist's Avatar
skaterbasist
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Southern Cali
Originally Posted by bboysteele
Altitude will make a difference. I didn't see in your sig that you had an auto. I know on my dynos the car drops power after 7k RPM so shifting at 7k seems to be the best thing instead of taking it to red line but maybe you can do this with the paddle shifters.
The worst thing you can do is short shift on a car with a very linear powerband.

Shifting at 7k will always result on a worse time. It's all about the average HP throughout the gear you are in... not just shifting at peak power.

Shifting at peak power means you will be at a disadvantage when you get into the next gear.

I've done more than 60 passes at the drag strip. And I can vouch that shifting at redline will yield better times than short shifting. My peak power is at 6300. And my redline is 7100. But the power drop from 6300 to 7100 is only 9 HP. The trade off by shifting at peak power will result on a much lower HP at the next gear than shifting at redline.

.

Last edited by skaterbasist; Sep 4, 2008 at 12:53 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 01:47 PM
  #29  
ghotnit's Avatar
ghotnit
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by skaterbasist
The worst thing you can do is short shift on a car with a very linear powerband.

Shifting at 7k will always result on a worse time. It's all about the average HP throughout the gear you are in... not just shifting at peak power.

Shifting at peak power means you will be at a disadvantage when you get into the next gear.

I've done more than 60 passes at the drag strip. And I can vouch that shifting at redline will yield better times than short shifting. My peak power is at 6300. And my redline is 7100. But the power drop from 6300 to 7100 is only 9 HP. The trade off by shifting at peak power will result on a much lower HP at the next gear than shifting at redline.

.
+1
Agreed. The engine is still making power beyond the peak. When you shift early, you drop the revs in the next gear putting you below the "sweet spot" in the powerband.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #30  
MaDd's Avatar
MaDd
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Studio City/Newport Beach
Originally Posted by skaterbasist
The worst thing you can do is short shift on a car with a very linear powerband.

Shifting at 7k will always result on a worse time. It's all about the average HP throughout the gear you are in... not just shifting at peak power.

Shifting at peak power means you will be at a disadvantage when you get into the next gear.

I've done more than 60 passes at the drag strip. And I can vouch that shifting at redline will yield better times than short shifting. My peak power is at 6300. And my redline is 7100. But the power drop from 6300 to 7100 is only 9 HP. The trade off by shifting at peak power will result on a much lower HP at the next gear than shifting at redline.

.
do you run your car in cali? if so what tracks do you go to?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.