G37 Sedan

Trade in for RS Q50?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2016 | 12:18 PM
  #16  
r2dmax's Avatar
r2dmax
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 71
From: Charlotte, NC from OH thru VA
I'm a Bimmer guy coming over to the G37. An E39 M5 properly sorted is an almost unmatched drive. Yes, there are faster cars now, but overall the feels!! I would possibly be willing to go with a Q50RS depending on M5 mileage and what major service it may need soon.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2016 | 08:31 PM
  #17  
Mattlorentzoe's Avatar
Mattlorentzoe
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 157
From: Gwinnett County, Georgia
Originally Posted by r2dmax
I'm a Bimmer guy coming over to the G37. An E39 M5 properly sorted is an almost unmatched drive. Yes, there are faster cars now, but overall the feels!! I would possibly be willing to go with a Q50RS depending on M5 mileage and what major service it may need soon.
That's the same problem I have with mine.... never buying a 7at from Infiniti/Nissan ever again
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 07:38 AM
  #18  
Daddy Fat Sacs's Avatar
Daddy Fat Sacs
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 376
From: Tampa
Well its not the same tranny in the Q as the G, the only issue with it was the responsiveness or lack of with the paddle shifters. As for the tranny, no lag, no harsh down shifts or sluggish feeling at all. I had the Q50RS as a loaner for almost a week.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 08:14 AM
  #19  
the93owner's Avatar
the93owner
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 335
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Daddy Fat Sacs
Well its not the same tranny in the Q as the G, the only issue with it was the responsiveness or lack of with the paddle shifters. As for the tranny, no lag, no harsh down shifts or sluggish feeling at all. I had the Q50RS as a loaner for almost a week.
I think it is the same transmission, both use the RE7R01A 7-speed automatic. It may just be programmed differently for different applications.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 08:28 AM
  #20  
ANMVQ's Avatar
ANMVQ
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,098
Likes: 395
From: Framingham Ma,
I just returned a Redsport( loaner) I had for 2 days and no way is the tranny the same, mine almost shifted like my 09 G37 tuned. The shifts in Sport+ with firm and fast( paddles 100% for two days). The only thing I didn't like is it wouldn't engine brake on down shifts as much as my 09. I'm thinking because the gearing is different. But I would trade mine in for one( wife said no tho) LOL

but the thing rips!

And lets remember our tranny is only good for 330 WHTQ or so. They wouldn't use that in the redsport as the WTRQ is too close to that
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 08:57 AM
  #21  
the93owner's Avatar
the93owner
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 335
From: Maryland
Trade in for RS Q50?-vipvwdm.jpg


Trade in for RS Q50?-jarbfrl.jpg


Are they not the same transmission models?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 10:36 AM
  #22  
xscoupe1985's Avatar
xscoupe1985
Registered Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by booster
I've had a problem withe the rear timing cover gasket failing on my 2010 G37. The car is currently at the shop getting fixed.
I just received an invite from Inifiniti to a 3 day private day sale claiming up to $10,500 off 2016 Q50s.
I've been considering trading in the G37 and my 2000 M5 for a new Q50 Red Sport. The MSRP on a RedSport is $54K - $10K discount - $20K for trade-ins puts me at around $26K + fees and tax...tempting
Thoughts? Not realistic? This is Canadian pricing, BTW.
The underrated HP numbers make it very tempting.
Might wanna make sure the$10k off pertains to the red sport. Most manufacturers don't include their top tier car in those kind of deals
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 12:02 PM
  #23  
canucklehead's Avatar
canucklehead
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 142
From: West Coast Canada
Originally Posted by xscoupe1985
Might wanna make sure the$10k off pertains to the red sport. Most manufacturers don't include their top tier car in those kind of deals
^ posts #9 and 12 above address your point. i had the same thought as you which is why i checked.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 02:00 PM
  #24  
ANMVQ's Avatar
ANMVQ
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,098
Likes: 395
From: Framingham Ma,
If the trans are the same,( not upgraded internals) the first guy that flashes the car will need a tranny :/.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 02:08 PM
  #25  
qmantran's Avatar
qmantran
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 183
From: ATX
Originally Posted by ANMVQ
If the trans are the same,( not upgraded internals) the first guy that flashes the car will need a tranny :/.
Can you explain
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 04:16 PM
  #26  
crazjayz's Avatar
crazjayz
Registered Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 499
Likes: 18
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by qmantran
Can you explain
What ANMVQ is saying is that the RE7R01A can handle a max tq of 330 lb/ft or so at the wheels. The Q50RS is listed as 350 lb/ft, which is ~300 lb/ft at the wheels. Any engine tuning of the Q50RS will easily bump that to over 330 lb/ft at the wheels, thus placing the transmission in a area of increased failure. Hence, anyone who flashes this car will need a new transmission.

The transmission has long been the Achilles heel of this car, either in G37/Q50 or in Q50 form. I've wondered why they didn't use the transmission from the M56, as that car puts out 417 lb/ft of torque.

Last edited by crazjayz; Nov 29, 2016 at 04:21 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 05:38 PM
  #27  
booster's Avatar
booster
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 106
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by canucklehead
^ posts #9 and 12 above address your point. i had the same thought as you which is why i checked.
I had confirmed this at the dealer, and had it documented on paper ($10,500 discount).

I think you guys are missing the point about the transmission in RedSport.
At this power level a nice shifting automatic transmission isn't good enough.
This model badly needs a DSG or manual, or something else, but what it received (the same gtransmission as every other Q50 model, maybe tuned but still the same).
Let me put it this way, the first time I drove the e39 M5 I had a **** eating grin on my face and right away though I gotta have one.
The first time I drove the RedSport, i was like meh, it's nice, a lot of power, but no soul, just blah.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2016 | 06:05 PM
  #28  
eljoker's Avatar
eljoker
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 192
Originally Posted by crazjayz
What ANMVQ is saying is that the RE7R01A can handle a max tq of 330 lb/ft or so at the wheels. The Q50RS is listed as 350 lb/ft, which is ~300 lb/ft at the wheels. Any engine tuning of the Q50RS will easily bump that to over 330 lb/ft at the wheels, thus placing the transmission in a area of increased failure. Hence, anyone who flashes this car will need a new transmission.

The transmission has long been the Achilles heel of this car, either in G37/Q50 or in Q50 form. I've wondered why they didn't use the transmission from the M56, as that car puts out 417 lb/ft of torque.
The thing is that they already proved inputs 350lbs to the wheels. Stollen, FI and I believe Z1 has dumps for it. I was told it was an updated transmission. Not new but updated. Who knows what they really touched.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 01:15 AM
  #29  
Ricio1991's Avatar
Ricio1991
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 113
From: Tempe,AZ
I almost traded in my sedan for a premium 3.0t today. They were giving me the pay off on my sedan which was insane because it's not even worth the 17k I owe on it. Only reason I didn't was because it was a lease 499 a mo with 15k miles per year and I don't know if I was able to handle that payment and also insurance for it since I only pay 120 for my g. Man I wish I would of been got it I would had to pay the taxes, first mo and also taxes and fees
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2016 | 08:30 AM
  #30  
ANMVQ's Avatar
ANMVQ
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,098
Likes: 395
From: Framingham Ma,
Originally Posted by Ricio1991
I almost traded in my sedan for a premium 3.0t today. They were giving me the pay off on my sedan which was insane because it's not even worth the 17k I owe on it. Only reason I didn't was because it was a lease 499 a mo with 15k miles per year and I don't know if I was able to handle that payment and also insurance for it since I only pay 120 for my g. Man I wish I would of been got it I would had to pay the taxes, first mo and also taxes and fees
God the 499 is insane man. Right now here in MA they have a sign and drive a true 0 out of pocket on the 3.0T Premium and its on 349 a month. Sounds like they may have rolled you trade in into the price?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 AM.