G37 Sedan

G35 vs. G37

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 06:39 PM
  #1  
forrmark's Avatar
forrmark
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 15
G35 vs. G37

I read a letter in Automobile magazine that said the G35 is a better car than the G37 and the Q50 is worse than both. I have a G37 so I don't know about the G35, never having driven one. If you have driven all three, is this true?
What makes the G35 better than the G37?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 06:55 PM
  #2  
AroundTheG37's Avatar
AroundTheG37
Registered Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 223
From: Katy (close to Houston)
Originally Posted by forrmark
I read a letter in Automobile magazine that said the G35 is a better car than the G37 and the Q50 is worse than both. I have a G37 so I don't know about the G35, never having driven one. If you have driven all three, is this true?
What makes the G35 better than the G37?
Name:  8f2.jpg
Views: 252
Size:  49.5 KB
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
8f2.jpg (49.5 KB, 37 views)
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 528
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by forrmark
I read a letter in Automobile magazine that said the G35 is a better car than the G37 and the Q50 is worse than both. I have a G37 so I don't know about the G35, never having driven one. If you have driven all three, is this true?
What makes the G35 better than the G37?
Link to automobile magazine article???
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 07:32 PM
  #4  
e3phung's Avatar
e3phung
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 177
Likes: 13
From: NoVA
Originally Posted by AroundTheG37
LOL
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 07:40 PM
  #5  
Rochester's Avatar
Rochester
Administrator
15 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,859
Likes: 5,149
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by forrmark
I read a letter in Automobile magazine that said the G35 is a better car than the G37 and the Q50 is worse than both.
A letter, you say... as in, Reader Comments? Srsly?

Originally Posted by forrmark
What makes the G35 better than the G37?
It's less expensive. And you can get that oh-so-cool CF memory slot.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 09:28 PM
  #6  
itzjawkneeboi's Avatar
itzjawkneeboi
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 13
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by forrmark
I read a letter in Automobile magazine that said the G35 is a better car than the G37 and the Q50 is worse than both. I have a G37 so I don't know about the G35, never having driven one. If you have driven all three, is this true?
What makes the G35 better than the G37?
It's an older outdated car... So other than the price tag, nothing better really.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 12:02 AM
  #7  
forrmark's Avatar
forrmark
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Lego_Maniac
Link to automobile magazine article???
I said it was a letter not an article.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 12:31 AM
  #8  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,876
Likes: 4,951
I've had both, although my G35 was also a second generation 2007. Both are very similar, but I wouldn't say the 35 was better. I think I would say it had more of an advantage in styling and performance over similar cars in 2007 compared to what the 37 does now. But then again, it was "fresh"
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 08:13 AM
  #9  
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 528
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by forrmark
I said it was a letter not an article.
That's even worse.

It's like saying "I read it on the internet"
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 09:56 AM
  #10  
forrmark's Avatar
forrmark
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Lego_Maniac
That's even worse.

It's like saying "I read it on the internet"
This forum is on the internet. If you feel that all the opinions expressed here are useless, why are you here?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 10:06 AM
  #11  
Rochester's Avatar
Rochester
Administrator
15 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,859
Likes: 5,149
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by forrmark
This forum is on the internet. If you feel that all the opinions expressed here are useless, why are you here?
Because opinions on the forum are open to discussion, no matter how ridiculous. Whereas a Letter to the Editor in a printed Magazine has no such opportunity. It was hand-picked by the Editor, so it passed some level of approval, but certainly not the same thing as a qualified review. It's just a fart in the wind... unless the idea is moved online into a discussion forum. Like this one, I suppose.

But really, I think the larger context in Lego's comment is that this is a stupid premise for discussion, so the best you can hope for is that someone ridicule it.

***** Wonka, FTW.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 10:24 AM
  #12  
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 528
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Rochester
But really, I think the larger context in Lego's comment is that this is a stupid premise for discussion
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 10:27 AM
  #13  
mummy2's Avatar
mummy2
Registered Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 985
Likes: 144
From: Baltimore
Originally Posted by forrmark
I read a letter in Automobile magazine that said the G35 is a better car than the G37 and the Q50 is worse than both. I have a G37 so I don't know about the G35, never having driven one. If you have driven all three, is this true?
What makes the G35 better than the G37?
I'll answer your question. The G35 was actually faster than the G37 because it had more low end torque. More responsive transmission too. But people complained about the noise, vibration, harshness, and gas mileage of the 3.5 liter engine though, so the G37 was born.

Before you guys say well the G37 has more horse power so it's gotta be faster, you are wrong. Test drove quite a few G35's and I own a G37, and I'll tell you I wish i had the 35's low end power.

From Consumer Reports:

2007 G35 Journey

0-60. 5.4
45-65. 3.7
quarter mile. 14.0

2007 G35 X

0-30. 2.3
0-60. 5.6
45-65. 3.8
quarter mile. 14.2 at 100.6 mph

2009 G37 Journey

0-60. 5.6
45-65. 3.8
quarter mile. 14.1

2014 Q50 AWD

0-30. 2.3
0-60. 5.6
45-65. 4.3
quarter mile. 14.1 at 102.8 mph
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 10:53 AM
  #14  
alfredo24pr's Avatar
alfredo24pr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 796
Likes: 95
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by mummy2
I'll answer your question. The G35 was actually faster than the G37 because it had more low end torque. More responsive transmission too. But people complained about the noise, vibration, harshness, and gas mileage of the 3.5 liter engine though, so the G37 was born.

Before you guys say well the G37 has more horse power so it's gotta be faster, you are wrong. Test drove quite a few G35's and I own a G37, and I'll tell you I wish i had the 35's low end power.
Isn't that due to the 5AT's 3.69 gears vs the 7AT's 3.3?

From what I have read, a gear swap will "fix" that problem.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 10:55 AM
  #15  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,876
Likes: 4,951
It depends on the source, I've seen 0-60s as low as 5.2 for the 37 and 5.3 for the 35, having owned both it seems like the 37 has a bit more jump off the line but not having to shift as much the 35 times are very close. I wouldn't say one was noticeably faster than the other. Sometimes I miss the more decisive nature of the 5AT, but when filling up I appreciate the 7 speed.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.