G37 Sedan

New PR! 4.9 0-60, 13.33 1/4 mile

Old Jan 24, 2011 | 02:15 PM
  #16  
crazjayz's Avatar
crazjayz
Registered Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 499
Likes: 18
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by dopey
Motor trend or car & driver or one of the magazines got 4.9 with an IS350. Edmunds got really close as well. This was stock, so no, the IS350 is not slower. The A4 though is.
Originally Posted by Jayhawk815
I'm calling b.s. unless you can provide a link. C&D's best time was 5.1, while MT's and Edmund's best time was 5.2. I've never seen a stock IS350 post a 4.9 sec 0-60 time in any major publication.
Road & Track's IS350 0-60mph of 4.9sec

Last edited by crazjayz; Jan 24, 2011 at 02:25 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #17  
ozzypriest's Avatar
ozzypriest
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 13
From: Deep South MS
Okay, we're getting a little OT..

Here is the television show on which the Garage419 guys used a Mini Cooper, and the Dynolicious app's accuracy was compared to a mustang dyno, and then a dragstrip timed run at Englishtown - the $13 iPhone app was dean on with the dyno and timeslips - it's pretty amazing. And it was G-tech, not dashawk that was the comparison home timing device.

<iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0-DFbJQbeSY" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen></iframe>
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 03:21 PM
  #18  
Jayhawk815's Avatar
Jayhawk815
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 1
From: Dodge City, KS
Originally Posted by crazjayz
Eh, Road & Track doesn't count as a major publication! I stand corrected. Thread hijacking disengaged.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 03:35 PM
  #19  
Chico's Avatar
Chico
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
From: NYC
Test Notes: acceleration
Acceleration runs in the TL and G35 benefit
from mid- to high-rpm launches and require
more finesse than the IS 350’s floor-it-and go
automatic, supplementing its quick times
with stepless upshifts.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 09:38 PM
  #20  
Ibanez540r's Avatar
Ibanez540r
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 895
Likes: 9
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by Chico
Test Notes: acceleration
Acceleration runs in the TL and G35 benefit
from mid- to high-rpm launches and require
more finesse than the IS 350’s floor-it-and go
automatic, supplementing its quick times
with stepless upshifts.
That is because the Acura and G were both 6 speed manuals and the IS was an automatic. Don't forget all those tests were with a G35S before the improvements in the G37S 7AT and the akebono brakes. ... I think numbers would be a bit closer to the IS, but not quite equal..
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 10:23 PM
  #21  
eksigned's Avatar
eksigned
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 15
From: Pacific NW
Originally Posted by dopey
Motor trend or car & driver or one of the magazines got 4.9 with an IS350. Edmunds got really close as well. This was stock, so no, the IS350 is not slower. The A4 though is.
you're right. the is350 however though is geared for the 1/4 mile. have you seen one pull from top ends around 70+ mph? they simply...run out of steam.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 10:24 PM
  #22  
eksigned's Avatar
eksigned
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 15
From: Pacific NW
Originally Posted by eksigned
that sounds about right. dynolicious is awesome! by the way, op...can I ask why you went with hypertech over say, uprev/Osiris?
bump for op!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 12:36 AM
  #23  
ozzypriest's Avatar
ozzypriest
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 13
From: Deep South MS
yes, thank you eksigned - I chose Hypertech because it was cheap and easy - seriously, plus the gains looked better on paper than the COBB stage 1 - and now that Hypertech supports intakes and catbacks (at least informally, I've been told by a Hypertech engineer) all is good.

And if anybody bothers to watch the video, you'll see how accurate the Dynolicious app really is - it's not a toy.

and CV - the G8 was awesome, but the interior was almost as cheap as a pre-011 Charger (the new Chargers are awesome inside and out) but that G8 was fun as hell to drive. More fun than my G37. I had it stock with a canned tune from Cortex which also included a great tranny tune, and I could pop the rears loose and get a chirp if I floored it going 60. But mine had build quality issues, and I foresaw a future of much hanging out at Pontiac service bays, and I got rid of it for my second choice, the G37 (which has been a lot of fun in its own right). The G8 was much more visceral than my G37 - you could easily forgive it's crappy insides for the ride and power and handling.

However I couldn't forgive rear main seal leaks, constant control arm and ball joint issues, weird radio problems, AC issues, an ill-fitting driver's side door and heat shield flapping loose. And squeaky seals. It truly was a budget 5-series, right down to all the same build issues.

I am hoping the new Chevy Zeta sedan (Chevelle SS?) in 2012, which will be built in america, will fix all those issues so I can ****** one up. If gas isn't $4 gallon.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 12:27 AM
  #24  
crazjayz's Avatar
crazjayz
Registered Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 499
Likes: 18
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by ozzypriest
I am hoping the new Chevy Zeta sedan (Chevelle SS?) in 2012, which will be built in america, will fix all those issues so I can ****** one up. If gas isn't $4 gallon.
It won't be.


It'll be $5/gal.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 01:19 AM
  #25  
cvt's Avatar
cvt
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
have you overlayed your dynolicious runs? can we see how much you've imporoved?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 01:34 AM
  #26  
LiquidPlatg37S's Avatar
LiquidPlatg37S
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Nice numbers... Hypertech FTW...
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 03:17 AM
  #27  
ozzypriest's Avatar
ozzypriest
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 13
From: Deep South MS
for the request of overlays - too much info on the charts, so I grabbed a few from 'milestone' points, and am presenting them sequentially by date.

okay, here is a full run, pre-hypertech, when the engine was totally green, and I wasn't good at launching it
http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389237429/here we are a few months later, still pre-hypertech, engine is getting broken in, and I am getting used to that stupid throttle of infiniti's.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389841666/http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389841666/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/58714084@N04/, on Flickr

Now, fast forward a bit to hypertech-land - one of my better runs before a few nights ago

http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389236839/http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389236839/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/58714084@N04/, on Flickr

And then a month later, I think I downloaded a new tune from HT, and got this result:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389841204/http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389841204/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/58714084@N04/, on Flickr

I had another great run at 5.18 a few days later (from the above graph), and then, after my latest update and some great cold, dry weather (and new bridgestone hi-po tires, btw, with 245's on the rear) I got my PR:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389862570/http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389862570/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/58714084@N04/, on Flickr

so who knows? I do know that I went from 5.5 -5.6's to 5.2s and 5.3s on a regular basis with HT, and then my latest update gave me my holy grail, which was to get sub-5, and there you go. In fact, it was almost a GD 4.8 - I guess that's my next try. Hypertech and a broken-in engine that I drive the hell out of FW! Oh, and my inputted weight has stayed the same since I first started using DynoL as has my 1/4 mile 'strip' - but I'm showing a nice linear progression over time as the engine gets broken in, and the tunes get better. Oh, and here's my misc. results page, and the HP shown is DL's estimate at the crank - I have no way of accurately estimating drivetrain loss for the 7AT, so I let it grab crank numbers - 345 is still pretty nice with just a canned tune!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389278293/http://www.flickr.com/photos/58714084@N04/5389278293/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/58714084@N04/, on Flickr

Last edited by ozzypriest; Jan 26, 2011 at 03:27 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jfisher
Build Threads
89
Apr 25, 2017 01:22 PM
redlinernyc
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
10
Feb 29, 2016 11:06 PM
charneco
Private Classifieds
11
Feb 21, 2016 11:11 PM
Mattlorentzoe
G37 Sedan
10
Sep 4, 2015 10:41 AM
ZachThomas
Newbie Corner
2
Sep 3, 2015 01:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 AM.