G37 Sedan

2010 g37 fuel economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 06:38 PM
  #31  
G35leander's Avatar
G35leander
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer-Bob
G35Leander:

"you have to draw the line somewhere!"
I agree with that. I have experienced and became spoiled by the BMW DI TT engine performance in my 07 lease; but burning oil and coolant make it a big disappointment for long term ownership. So, this is why for 2010, I'm choosing the more reliable and economical route of choosing a Japanese brand with planned long term ownership (6+ years). I suspect I'll go back to my old driving habits of driving peakier Japanese engines and be just fine - it remains to be seen how long I'll have my withdrawal symptoms from big torque down low...
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 01:47 AM
  #32  
mw09g37's Avatar
mw09g37
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 726
Likes: 1
i completely agree. I mean I would much rather have a 300/300 than a 330/270. it'd be a much more exciting drive.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 12:25 AM
  #33  
Greg Lecewicz's Avatar
Greg Lecewicz
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
My new g37s coupe gets 10mpg!!!!

Originally Posted by mw09g37
if you see the sticker the numbers for the epa mpg ratings is crazy ( mean for any of them the 2008/2009/2010) they'll give a huge delta range: like expected 15-21 for city 19mpg and expected 24-32 for hwy 27mpg which gives the 22 mpg rating. .

I mean I can tell you from experience.

my commute is 13 miles each way. it's a mix of expressway (no traffic) and city streets
in my previous 2008 G35S 5AT Sedan I achieve 22mpg on the commute
in the 2008 G37S 6MT Coupe I achieve 20 mpg on the commute
in the 2009 G37S 7AT Sedan I achieve 17 mpg on the commute.
in the 2008 EX35S 5AT Loaner I achieve 19mpg on the commute.
in a IS350 6AT I get 23 mpg on the commute.

when i get to use the HWY bump all those numbers by 2mpg.


I mean it really really sucks how big this range is. I mean I say either some major tuning is in order or some better engine management.

personally I don't mind 17mpg. but my car better have more than 330 hp... I mean shoot m3s get better mileage than most of the 2009s out there.
What do you think causes 10mpg aver. on my new car. Is the computer screwd up. And NO I DON't ride the brake all the time!
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 02:07 AM
  #34  
c4racer's Avatar
c4racer
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
we are seeing 21mpg average in mixed driving - the speed average shows ~25 to give you an idea - probably more than 50% city driving. this is also with my wife driving and she tends to get at least -2mpg in any car compared to when I drive it. Lead foot and doesn't really drive with a thought towards economy. On one 80% freeway trip when the car had all of a few hundred miles on it, averaged 25-26mpg range. I felt that was pretty good. Should get better as it breaks in and gets up over 5K miles or so I would think.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 02:24 AM
  #35  
mw09g37's Avatar
mw09g37
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 726
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Greg Lecewicz
What do you think causes 10mpg aver. on my new car. Is the computer screwd up. And NO I DON't ride the brake all the time!

I dunno dude. I ask myself the same question. I keep track using the onboard, the fill up and obdII computer... and my fuel economy sucks...

I get better gas mileage (barely) when I floor it... I mean don't get it at all DS with a lot of accelerating is better than D slow acceleration.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 10:19 AM
  #36  
328HP's Avatar
328HP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
2010 G37xS

60 miles on the odometer, 10mpg average. Mainly local driving, less than 35mph. Improved from 7mpg when she had 20 miles. She will be on the highway this weekend, will update the group after one full tank but I expect the mpg's to go up at least 100% from where there are now after 1,000 miles.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #37  
JonfromCB's Avatar
JonfromCB
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 273
Likes: 2
From: Council Bluffs Iowa
Originally Posted by sonicloud
I am wondering if the +1 mpg on the 2010 G is the result of the new firmware for the 7 AT, if that's the case then I might consider bring mine in for the TSB for the rough down shift.
Increased mileage on 2010 models is based on "fleet mileage" standards
measured by EPA and CAFE standards. Nissan implemented their new oil mid 08 model year as their FF(factory fill) to increase their fleet mileage. since it was mid model year 08, it took 1 full model year for CAFE/EPA to verify increases..hence mileage increase did not show up on stickers
until 2010 models.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 12:02 PM
  #38  
Boomer-Bob's Avatar
Boomer-Bob
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 699
Likes: 10
From: In fear
I usually have the car in "D" sometimes "DS" once in awhile "M". I drive about 50 / 50 Freeway and surface. Passengers sometimes kiss the ground when they get out of the car. :-) I still get a shade better than 20 MPG with a 2009 7AT. (I don't need the A/C here much and usually drive more than 20 miles at a time.)
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 02:04 PM
  #39  
mw09g37's Avatar
mw09g37
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 726
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by JonfromCB
Increased mileage on 2010 models is based on "fleet mileage" standards
measured by EPA and CAFE standards. Nissan implemented their new oil mid 08 model year as their FF(factory fill) to increase their fleet mileage. since it was mid model year 08, it took 1 full model year for CAFE/EPA to verify increases..hence mileage increase did not show up on stickers
until 2010 models.
this is true. but I think there are just caveats to that determination too. although the EPA rates the 2010 at 19 to 28. or something. did you see the delta on those numbers? it's like 15-20 on the City and 24-32 on the highway. I'm bitching and moaning about these numbers cause I'm seeing 12-14 city and 21-28 highway.

but yeah the factory fill oil makes a big difference in the EPA rating. This is why I think although the ester oil is nice, but it's an incredible dis-service to any VVEL owner for forcing us to use it and have it not be synthetic. I mean It's got me to want to try out the 300V... but i'm locked into the infiniti maintenance plan.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 01:20 AM
  #40  
c4racer's Avatar
c4racer
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
I changed oil and filter at 1000 miles and put in Mobil 1 5W30. dunno if it has changed the mpg, but I expect the motor will continue to do better as it breaks in anyway regardless of what oil is in there.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #41  
TinsleyC's Avatar
TinsleyC
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 674
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by mark34
I get 17 from almost exclusively around town driving, only about 10% highway. I have to admit I was surprised, though I shouldn't have been. This was my move to a responsible car from my Cayman S... it got 16.5.
(G37S sedan, 2009)
I was very pleased with my mileage driving from Austin to Dallas last week. I've got a 2009 G37 sedan with 8,000 miles on it.

The temp was about 45, no wind, dry, and overcast. I don't know if there was a gradual drop or rise in the terrain, but overall the terrain was low and long hills as Texas can be. I was on 35 headed north.

In each test I drove about 5 miles with the cruise on. At the top of a hill I would lock the cruise at a speed and reset the mileage guage. I took my reading after about 5 miles of travel, at the top of another hill.

At 75 MPH, I got 31.2 MPG.
At 65 MPH, I got 35.5 MPG.

57 miles from home I filled it up with Shell premium and completed my trip. I reset the gas mileage guage and left the gas station. I used cruise most of the way, coming into Dallas on 35E, then up 75 into Dallas. I often had to turn off the cruise and change speeds, lanes, etc... in 6:30 PM traffic. When I got home, the mileage read 31.5 MPG for the last 57 miles! Love it.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #42  
328HP's Avatar
328HP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
2010 G37xS mileage to date

First tank 15.2mpg Refilled @ 280 miles

Second tank 18 mpg. Refilled @ around 580 miles

Currently 18.8 mpg, I did not reset when I filled up the 2nd tank so this is cumulative from when she had 280 miles.

All mixed driving, maybe 50 50

The thing I like about this trend is the car is hardly broken in, less than 700 miles on it, its in the middle of winter, less than 35 degrees since I got her and I am matching my 08 +40000 miles fuel mileage. it can only get better from here
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 10:11 AM
  #43  
Hi Alt G's Avatar
Hi Alt G
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 1
From: Laramie, WY
FWIW. I just did a round trip from home to Denver Airport and back (right around 300 miles). All but 7 miles were on interstate and dash showed 71.4 mph. Mostly on cruise control. I got 25.3 mpg. Car has about 3000 miles on it. Temps were in the 40's and 30's. Little wind. One major hill each way (total elevation gain was around 3400 ft; 7200ft up to 8600 down to 5280 and reverse).

Last edited by Hi Alt G; Feb 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 12:02 AM
  #44  
TinsleyC's Avatar
TinsleyC
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 674
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Hi Alt G
FWIW. I just did a round trip from home to Denver Airport and back (right around 300 miles). All but 7 miles were on interstate and dash showed 71.4 mph. Mostly on cruise control. I got 25.3 mpg. Car has about 3000 miles on it. Temps were in the 40's and 30's. Little wind. One major hill each way (total elevation gain was around 3400 ft; 7200ft up to 8600 down to 5280 and reverse).
I'm sure it was that elevation that reduced it down. My Texas hills were pretty flat.

On my trip I can see that my test area between Austin and Dallas dropped from about 700 to 550 feet above sea level (according to Google Earth), so I did have a little help there - but nothing like the climbs in your test.

Last edited by TinsleyC; Feb 9, 2010 at 12:21 AM. Reason: add more info
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 07:04 PM
  #45  
FatBoyG37S's Avatar
FatBoyG37S
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
2010 G37S Pre/Nav/Sport 20.2 MPG Mix driving

City 25%, Hwy 75%...City average speed 35mph...hwy average speed 75-80 mph...hope this help

Cheers!

DD
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.