G37 Coupe

AT really has an MT feel to it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 08:40 PM
  #31  
RedG37SNC's Avatar
RedG37SNC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Mike
Dangerous in a performance driving situation? Again, only if the driver lacks good technique.
Technique important but I'd prefer technology on my side as well.

Last edited by RedG37SNC; Jun 29, 2010 at 08:49 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 08:57 PM
  #32  
MSCA's Avatar
MSCA
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by RedG37SNC
You know I'd wager at least 7 out of 10 people on this board have some concern about performance.. hell that's why you bought a G37 and not a A5, IS250 or TL. The G had more HP and thrill. All I'm saying is that the best transmission tech today is not manual, it's a fast changing inteliigent semi-automatic transmission. It's faster than manual and you don't have to move your left foot or take a hand off the wheel. If you're after performance how could you want less?

Now if your a classic purist and like the involvement manual delivers that's fine... To me however the ideal transmission for a lux sport couple is a semi-automatic so you can have the best of both worlds which is the goal of the cars design. The G's current auto only marginally accomplishes this and as I see it is the greatest area in need of improvement...not HP.
The performance is nice, but that's not why I purchased this car. If performance was really a concern, the G37 wouldn't even be on my list. But just for the sake of argument, I can absolutely guarantee you that I drive my 6MT just as fast or faster than an otherwise identical 7AT. The whole "can't shift faster than an automatic" argument is weak because there are other factors at play here. A manual trans is a direct mechanical link with less parasitic drivetrain losses. That fact in itself gives the 6MT an advantage over the 7AT. The 7AT does have the advantage of an extra gear ratio, but I haven't compared the ratios between the two transmissions, so I'm not sure if it's really an advantage or not.

As for a semi-automatic transmission.....a purist wouldn't have it. It's just not the same thing. We NEED a clutch pedal. We NEED the engine to stall if we do nothing but hit the brake pedal and stop the car. It might not make sense to you, but believe me when I say that there are people who understand exactly what I'm talking about.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 09:00 PM
  #33  
MSCA's Avatar
MSCA
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by RedG37SNC
It seems we want the same things, I just don't think you're seeing that a semi automatic or DCT can meet your manual control needs just as well if not better actually. The only reason to hold on to MT is for nostalgia.
Nostalgia? Come on now..... you're obviously not a MT guy. If you were, you wouldn't say something so silly. There's simply no transmission on earth that gives you the complete control of your car the way a manual transmission does.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 09:05 PM
  #34  
MSCA's Avatar
MSCA
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Beer Magazine
Some are confusing terms and technology.

The G has a an automatic gear box with Torque converter.

The GTR has a dual clutches manual tranny. If you understand the difference you can't say they are "automatic" because they aren't. They are a computer operated clutch. And a dual clutch box is near seamless.

I got an AT because I wanted the color and chose MT on my last car. I can say it doesn't feel anything like MT. It's not bad but the response is slower and if you think the computer trying to save gas by going to the lowest RPM everywhere is like an MT...well I can't help you.

Yeah, the waters are muddy with all the different type of transmissions available today. It can be difficult to know exactly how a particular trans works without reading up on it. But to me, any transmission that has the ability to shift for itself is an automatic. Hell, remember how long ago BMW had their sequential gearboxes? They were basically a true manual trans with a clutch and all, but it could shift automatically...so in my mind it was still an automatic.

I've tried to warm up to many different versions of these "manumatic" transmissions, but none of the cars I've ever driven gave me nearly the enjoyment of driving a true manual trans car. There's just no way to replace the old tried and true MT in my opinion.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 09:07 PM
  #35  
MSCA's Avatar
MSCA
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Mike
Any car where the gears are shifted for you with no driver intervention (regardless of it has a manual mode) is an automatic. Whether it is a torque converter, DSG, SMG, tiptronic, etc. does not matter. It is still automatic

the English word automatic
derived from the Greek word automatos, αὐτόματος (self-moved ('automatic'); spontaneous)

A manual vehicle is one where the gears will not shift EXCEPT with driver intervention. A hydraulic sequential transmission is a manual. A traditional H gearbox is a manual. There is nobody doing the gear changing except yourself.

The GTR may have clutches, but it is still an automatic. Paddle shifted Ferraris are automatic. Exclusion of a clutch pedal does not make a car an automatic; there are clutchless manual transmissions.

F1 cars are a grey area, since the upshifts are done automatically, but the downshifts are not.
Wow, for once I agree with every word of your post. Amazing!
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 09:23 PM
  #36  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by RedG37SNC
Technique important but I'd prefer technology on my side as well.
Ever shift mid-turn while at the limit? It doesn't matter if the car is manual or automatic. You will lose control.

Unless it's a CVT.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 09:24 PM
  #37  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by MSCA
Wow, for once I agree with every word of your post. Amazing!
Truely amazing

Miracles do happen
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 09:53 PM
  #38  
Frankyg37s's Avatar
Frankyg37s
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: montreal canada
i love my 6mt cant wait for my new tranny
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 09:55 PM
  #39  
hispeed-lowdrag's Avatar
hispeed-lowdrag
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 5
From: Pensacola Beach, FL
Originally Posted by franky2222
i cant wait for my new tranny
gross





Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 10:00 PM
  #40  
RedG37SNC's Avatar
RedG37SNC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by MSCA
As for a semi-automatic transmission.....a purist wouldn't have it. It's just not the same thing. We NEED a clutch pedal. We NEED the engine to stall if we do nothing but hit the brake pedal and stop the car. It might not make sense to you, but believe me when I say that there are people who understand exactly what I'm talking about.
I'm not making a 7AT vs 6MT argument, I refering to a dual clutch automatic transmission with both a full auto and clutchless manual mode.

I understand the challenging aspect of operating a MT, the chance for failure, the proving of ones technique being better then anothers and therefore "better driver." I can see that. Kind of like the guys that like swords and hated guns.. killed the honor in fighting and evened the field of play. Maybe now you can understand why I called that nostalgic.

Racing today however seems just as competitive as before even without clutch pedals... I think they just go faster now. He'll in Nascar they pretty much never leave 4th while racing anyway.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:04 PM
  #41  
dillyyo's Avatar
dillyyo
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Xen
I'm sure I'm crazy

I know how to drive a manual, my last one was a WRX and I took a spirited canyon road drive to work every morning. My first test drive of a G was in a manual and I drove it like I stole something and having not driven stick in 8+ years me and the sales guy were impressed.

It's as if the AT wants to go fast, if you drop RPMs it has that 'manual feel', I can't explain it any other way, that has me reaching/thinking to downshift (so I paddle it), sort of the 'jerky' feeling that you are not driving the car properly/smoothly, which could be the case.

Am I crazy? DSRM?
The only thing the MT and AT would have in common is the apparent still learning manual driver. The 5AT is pretty bad on down shifts, at least mine is (2008 model). When you know how to properly shift a stick and rev match it is pretty flawless. Of course you have engine braking, but that "jerky" shifting is not a good thing especially when tracking the car where one is worried about cornering loads and matters related.

Just my .02

Let me clarify that in no way am I saying you are a crappy driver as I don't even know you, but rather that driving a stick around town normally is not like driving a car seriously hard where you might be challenging thresholds.

Last edited by dillyyo; Jun 29, 2010 at 11:07 PM. Reason: clarification
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:19 PM
  #42  
dillyyo's Avatar
dillyyo
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MSCA
The performance is nice, but that's not why I purchased this car. If performance was really a concern, the G37 wouldn't even be on my list. But just for the sake of argument, I can absolutely guarantee you that I drive my 6MT just as fast or faster than an otherwise identical 7AT. The whole "can't shift faster than an automatic" argument is weak because there are other factors at play here. A manual trans is a direct mechanical link with less parasitic drivetrain losses. That fact in itself gives the 6MT an advantage over the 7AT. The 7AT does have the advantage of an extra gear ratio, but I haven't compared the ratios between the two transmissions, so I'm not sure if it's really an advantage or not.

As for a semi-automatic transmission.....a purist wouldn't have it. It's just not the same thing. We NEED a clutch pedal. We NEED the engine to stall if we do nothing but hit the brake pedal and stop the car. It might not make sense to you, but believe me when I say that there are people who understand exactly what I'm talking about.
Couldn't agree with you more. I don't understand how some people claim the G to be a sports car. Maybe by definition, but any real sports car owner will tell you no way. Now keep in mind this does not include modded out G37s with redone suspensions and engines. I have yet to see how it would perform, but my guess is pretty nice, just more GT "sports car"
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:36 PM
  #43  
RedG37SNC's Avatar
RedG37SNC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by dillyyo
Couldn't agree with you more. I don't understand how some people claim the G to be a sports car. Maybe by definition, but any real sports car owner will tell you no way. Now keep in mind this does not include modded out G37s with redone suspensions and engines. I have yet to see how it would perform, but my guess is pretty nice, just more GT "sports car"
I would agree with and often have... none the less I would still want to see the car with a dual clutch auto/manual transmission. Basically just doing correctly what they started out to do in the first place.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:49 PM
  #44  
dillyyo's Avatar
dillyyo
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RedG37SNC
I would agree with and often have... none the less I would still want to see the car with a dual clutch auto/manual transmission. Basically just doing correctly what they started out to do in the first place.
Well that's the beauty of it as the car has an awesome GT exterior shell and now to see what that body design can do with suspension and power plant upgrades.

You know you like a car when you can't wait till the engine blows just so you have an excuse to build a long block up!

As far as the tranny goes I'm still kicking my self in the azz for ever thinking of my wife who barely ever touches the car. AT is not bad, but I want a stick when I upgrade with an SC or TT and suspension. with 80k on my G now trade in is not really an option.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:59 PM
  #45  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
KAHBOOM
Super Moderator of Pwnage
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 195
From: NC
Originally Posted by MSCA
The performance is nice, but that's not why I purchased this car. If performance was really a concern, the G37 wouldn't even be on my list. But just for the sake of argument, I can absolutely guarantee you that I drive my 6MT just as fast or faster than an otherwise identical 7AT. The whole "can't shift faster than an automatic" argument is weak because there are other factors at play here. A manual trans is a direct mechanical link with less parasitic drivetrain losses. That fact in itself gives the 6MT an advantage over the 7AT. .

If you look at the dynos posted on this board, and the 370 boards you will see there is negligible drivetrain loss diffrence between the 5AT and 6MT ... holds true also for 7AT and 6MT
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 AM.