Suggestions for Nominations
Thread Starter
Former Prez of LA G'Z
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 24
From: ~So.Cal~
Suggestions for Nominations
Okay, since last 4-5 threads were a nightmare. nogoodname007 and I agreeed to allow the COMMUNITY, to vote on how the rules should be. Any suggestions or ideas are welcomed.
Please, no more fighting and arguments. Just simple ideas.
Last day to suggest any ideas will be the last day of the month.
After that, the MAJORITY will have their idea/rules inserted for the nominations.
Please, no more fighting and arguments. Just simple ideas.
Last day to suggest any ideas will be the last day of the month.
After that, the MAJORITY will have their idea/rules inserted for the nominations.
5 cars each month winner picked by poll.
Nominees are picked from pool of people who want to participate by either a mod, vote or just randomly picked.
Seperate group for FI and NA.
If you are picked to run, win or loose then you cant run again for at least 2 months.
Personally I dont think there should be any seperate groups for sposored or not but whatever.
Nominees are picked from pool of people who want to participate by either a mod, vote or just randomly picked.
Seperate group for FI and NA.
If you are picked to run, win or loose then you cant run again for at least 2 months.
Personally I dont think there should be any seperate groups for sposored or not but whatever.
Trending Topics
iv argued that sponsored cars should be aloud because people work for those and it is not fair to discredit them... do i smell a little bit of jealousy? i mean if there are no sponsored cars i guess solo max choy and fireboy are all out...
FAIL
FAIL
dude, if you dont like the guys with sponsored cars, then dont vote for them. just because they earned themselves a sponsor(s) doesn't mean they should be excluded from the forum nominations.
i might be swayed to see the logic about FI against NA being "not fair", but by the same token, it's easily argued that sponsored against non-sponsored is "not fair". you have to look at it both ways, you know?
how about two groups, "NA/Non-Sponsored" & "ALL". whatever happens, happens.
how about two groups, "NA/Non-Sponsored" & "ALL". whatever happens, happens.
i might be swayed to see the logic about FI against NA being "not fair", but by the same token, it's easily argued that sponsored against non-sponsored is "not fair". you have to look at it both ways, you know?
how about two groups, "NA/Non-Sponsored" & "ALL". whatever happens, happens.
how about two groups, "NA/Non-Sponsored" & "ALL". whatever happens, happens.



^^^^