Edmunds: G37 vs 335i

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:12 AM

#16

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

In the more controlled environment of our instrumented testing facility, 4WAS doesn't seem to hamper the G37, and the car maintains 71.3 mph through the slalom.

The porky car slaloms better? If the 335 was smoother and more sporty shouldnt it have pulled better through slalom as well?

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:14 AM

#17

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by N50

I think it's a little misleading. They were testing a fully loaded G against a barebones 335i MT. Had both cars been loaded it would have been a different story. I see why, however, edmunds did what they did.

You cant test a 4WAS G against a non active steering BMW. I hope that 4WAS being mandatory is a bunch of crock....

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:14 AM

#18

N50

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 860

Likes: 0

From: 301, 269

I'm afraid that if Infiniti gets near 3 series prices too quickly, it could have a negative effect for sales of the G. Let's hope this isn't the case.

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:15 AM

#19

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

3,715-pound G37

Damn you need to join jenny craig for cars....

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:16 AM

#20

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

And there's plenty of headroom, something that can't be said of the sunroof-equipped G37 coupe.

So why couldnt they put a sunroof in the 335i? Selective omission?

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:17 AM

#21

N50

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 860

Likes: 0

From: 301, 269

Quote:

Originally Posted by bloodhound

You cant test a 4WAS G against a non active steering BMW. I hope that 4WAS being mandatory is a bunch of crock....

I agree. I think all edmunds was trying to show is if you want a fully loaded G, you only have to come up with $3800 to get a 335i MT (barebones). Trying to play up the fact that most people would rather get the "real thing" (even if it's lacking options) instead of the BMW "wanna-be". Although there where some positives, I think this review stings for Infiniti.

Last edited by N50; Jul 2, 2007 at 01:27 AM.

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:18 AM

#22

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

impressive ratings of 300 hp at 5,800 rpm and 300 lb-ft of torque at an incredibly modest 1,400 rpm

That torque is very impressive for 335

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:18 AM

#23

Yimbie

Yin-Yang and Life

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 867

Likes: 0

From: Apple Valley, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by bloodhound

You cant test a 4WAS G against a non active steering BMW. I hope that 4WAS being mandatory is a bunch of crock....

According to Infiniti specifications... the 4WAS G is an option on the G37 Sport, unless Infiniti changed it for some reason.

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:20 AM

#24

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

As with all Bimmer gearboxes, this one feels slightly glutinous as you move the lever through the gates. Compared to the G's shift action, though, the BMW has a lighter-effort feel and it snaps positively into gear.

The g37 weighs more than g35 and thats a negative for the g, but the 335 doesnt have as good a clutch as wat the put in the other bimmers, but its a positive for the BMW b/c its better than G37....

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:21 AM

#25

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yimbie

According to Infiniti specifications... the 4WAS G is an option on the G37 Sport, unless Infiniti changed it for some reason.

Or Edmunds had one of the selective inclusion/omission inclination....

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:23 AM

#26

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Found info on other page of website

Last edited by bloodhound; Jul 2, 2007 at 01:34 AM.

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:27 AM

#27

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

Due to its higher price and shorter features list, the 3 Series won this test by only 2.3 points. But contained within those points are all the details that make it a more intimate and involving driving partner.

Said scoring card for further details would be?.....

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:27 AM

#28

mygiantcircle

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 74

Likes: 0

btw, Infiniti of Gwinnet in ATL says they are getting 9 in August, all automatic...bleh...

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:29 AM

#29

bloodhound

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 269

Likes: 0

Quote:

one of our editors recorded in the notebook for this comparison. "I'm not sure what the price difference is, but the BMW feels $15,000 better."

lol wat are the chances this guy really didnt kno wat the price difference was?

Jul 2, 2007 | 01:29 AM

#30

Yimbie

Yin-Yang and Life

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 867

Likes: 0

From: Apple Valley, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by bloodhound

Or Edmunds had one of the selective inclusion/omission inclination....

Does anyone know why Edmunds had to include it in this comparison? I don't really see the purpose. The review would've turned out differently if they didn't include it as in the comparison test they blame the different feelings toward the G37 due to the 4WAS they included.

Last edited by Yimbie; Jul 2, 2007 at 01:31 AM.

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 11
Next
Last

Forum Jump