400HP Possible N/A?
#46
Premier Member
iTrader: (7)
No it's not. I read and used to think the same thing but there are some data logs posted on here by modme. You can see the signal to the throttle bodies going up and down in voltage the whole time he is driving. He was just driving around, up and down in speed and through the gears. It shows the throttle bodies do in fact throttle.
#47
Registered User
Thread Starter
No it's not. I read and used to think the same thing but there are some data logs posted on here by modme. You can see the signal to the throttle bodies going up and down in voltage the whole time he is driving. He was just driving around, up and down in speed and through the gears. It shows the throttle bodies do in fact throttle.
#48
Administrator
No it's not. I read and used to think the same thing but there are some data logs posted on here by modme. You can see the signal to the throttle bodies going up and down in voltage the whole time he is driving. He was just driving around, up and down in speed and through the gears. It shows the throttle bodies do in fact throttle.
Come to think about it, what's the point of a throttle valve anyways if it's going to be open all the time? An additional flow restrictor
#49
Premier Member
iTrader: (7)
First question: Good question. Somehow the designers felt it was either a good way to go or a the right thing to do. Two throttle bodies have been used before by others and they obviously must have their advantages in some applications. Funny thing, two smaller throttle bodies allow for finer throttle control than one big throttle body does. That's a little odd considering some of the publications out there say the VVEL allows for the throttle bodies to be held wide open while the intake valves do the throttling.
Second question: Even if the throttle bodies fully opened during normal operation, which they don't if you look at modme's data logs, there are still certain situations which the VVEL probably couldn't handle, such as idle and cold start-up.
The video's about the VVEL when it first came out said (or in an animation showed) the throttle bodies would be full open while the intake valves do the throttling.
The VVEL is really neat and has potential, but it's not nearly as dynamic as some believe.
#52
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
No it's not. I read and used to think the same thing but there are some data logs posted on here by modme. You can see the signal to the throttle bodies going up and down in voltage the whole time he is driving. He was just driving around, up and down in speed and through the gears. It shows the throttle bodies do in fact throttle.
#55
Premier Member
iTrader: (7)
Well ok, I just told you the operating ranges. To be even more exact, on one G37 on here it is 0.40v closed and 4.3v full open. Not every car is the same. The throttle bodies do in fact throttle.
I could always take a drill bit, boroscope, and a video camera and make a video of the throttle bodies in action for you. I'm not willing to do that to Her car (because I like to get laid), but I'm willing to do it to a rental or someone else's car.
The Nissan training video of the VVEL (animation) was just an introduction to the VVEL. That video said the TB's would just go full open. That was incorrect. It might work that way in theory, but it's not the way the VHR does it right now.
#58
Registered Member
Regarding VVEL and throttle bodies, I read somewhere (maybe on the 370Z forum) that varying the valve lift alone did not give enough "turn down" at lower throttle openings - meaning that they use the butterflys to meter below a certain throttle level. The idea is to reduce pumping losses and improve throttle response. In reality we have lag time in the (CANbus?) hardware connecting the different processors in the car.
#59
#60
Registered Member