2013 Sedan Mustang Dyno results: 338hp
Thread Starter
Registered Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 3
2013 Sedan Mustang Dyno results: 338hp
Car: 2013 G37 Sedan 7AT, 56k miles
Conditions: Sea level, 94 degrees, 70% humidity
Runs: Mustang Dyno in 4th gear with hood closed, hot engine (intake tubes were too hot keep your hand on them), single carpet drying type fan 4ft from front bumper.
Fuel: 93 octane + Boostane to reach 100 Octane
Mods:
ECUTEC remote tune by Seb
AAM 2.75" CAI (2.5" ID MAF)
Synolimit 63mm bored throttle bodies
Synolimit Ported upper and lower intake plenums
Motordyne ART pipes
Fast Intentions Cat Back (18" res)
370z rear end (3.69 gears)
One piece steel DS
19" G35 Forged Rays
Michelin Pilot 4S
Thread Starter
Registered Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 3
Registered Member
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 360
Bottom left of the pic shows: "Correction Method: Standard"
Many shops like to correct to standard, as it results in almost a 3% larger gain than the SAE J1349 standard.
Regardless, you still are making a lot of power!
Take it to the drag strip and see what it runs.
Your trap speed is the best way to measure HP
Many shops like to correct to standard, as it results in almost a 3% larger gain than the SAE J1349 standard.
Regardless, you still are making a lot of power!
Take it to the drag strip and see what it runs.
Your trap speed is the best way to measure HP
Registered Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 547
Likes: 33
Maybe you just have a crazy fast car. Those numbers seem almost too good to be true though. And doesn't mustang usually put out lower numbers than dynojet?
But reminds me of this guy on old e90post board. Had a stock N54 with tune only. Was trapping high 11's I think. Or at most low 12's. He just had a freak of nature car. Sometimes the factory just puts out a little monster along with the other cattle.
But reminds me of this guy on old e90post board. Had a stock N54 with tune only. Was trapping high 11's I think. Or at most low 12's. He just had a freak of nature car. Sometimes the factory just puts out a little monster along with the other cattle.
Thread Starter
Registered Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 3
Bottom left of the pic shows: "Correction Method: Standard"
Many shops like to correct to standard, as it results in almost a 3% larger gain than the SAE J1349 standard.
Regardless, you still are making a lot of power!
Take it to the drag strip and see what it runs.
Your trap speed is the best way to measure HP
Many shops like to correct to standard, as it results in almost a 3% larger gain than the SAE J1349 standard.
Regardless, you still are making a lot of power!
Take it to the drag strip and see what it runs.
Your trap speed is the best way to measure HP
Maybe you just have a crazy fast car. Those numbers seem almost too good to be true though. And doesn't mustang usually put out lower numbers than dynojet?
But reminds me of this guy on old e90post board. Had a stock N54 with tune only. Was trapping high 11's I think. Or at most low 12's. He just had a freak of nature car. Sometimes the factory just puts out a little monster along with the other cattle.
But reminds me of this guy on old e90post board. Had a stock N54 with tune only. Was trapping high 11's I think. Or at most low 12's. He just had a freak of nature car. Sometimes the factory just puts out a little monster along with the other cattle.
Maybe you just have a crazy fast car. Those numbers seem almost too good to be true though. And doesn't mustang usually put out lower numbers than dynojet?
But reminds me of this guy on old e90post board. Had a stock N54 with tune only. Was trapping high 11's I think. Or at most low 12's. He just had a freak of nature car. Sometimes the factory just puts out a little monster along with the other cattle.
But reminds me of this guy on old e90post board. Had a stock N54 with tune only. Was trapping high 11's I think. Or at most low 12's. He just had a freak of nature car. Sometimes the factory just puts out a little monster along with the other cattle.
