When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So is anyone running the KW V3 on sedan without sagging in the rear. I don't really have this issue with my Tein Basis so maybe I could just keep the Tein springs in the back.
Even the coupes have this problem. The KW's, like almost all G coil-overs, were designed for the Z34 platform. It apparently has a shorter distance to the top of the "shock" tower than the V36 platform.
As for Lego's comment, while the stock rear fender ach is lower than the front in relation to the axle, the bottom of the car is level. It seems this is not the case with the KW.
As for Lego's comment, while the stock rear fender ach is lower than the front in relation to the axle, the bottom of the car is level. It seems this is not the case with the KW.
Everyone measures f/r gap and says the car is droopy, and it is. On Swift’s, from the bottom of the ground effects f/r I’m eyeball level on my tape measure.
So many of y’all are obsessed with “stance” and fractions of an inch
Everyone measures f/r gap and says the car is droopy, and it is. On Swift’s, from the bottom of the ground effects f/r I’m eyeball level on my tape measure.
So many of y’all are obsessed with “stance” and fractions of an inch
KW offers a spacer but specifically voids the warrantee if you use. Go figure.
While I had to top out the rear damper, I like how the MeisterR looks. If my driveway were flatter, my car would be lower.
I am looking at a used set so the warranty would be void anyway and Bilstein does the same thing if we even use their suspension on our cars since they really only make a suspension for the Z and G coupe- it's just Tire Rack listing the same part number online as fitting our car.
It's good that most 370Z parts fit our car because hardly anyone makes aftermarket parts specifically for the G37 sedan.