G37 Sedan
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

It seems like upper cylinder lubricant works!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2015, 10:35 AM
  #1  
joeltender
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
joeltender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It seems like upper cylinder lubricant works!

I tried the lucas in my old 6mt maxima and had great results. I assumed the great mileage results were from the timing advance, gab mod etc.
Now ive started adding it to my 6mt g sedan and wow!
Not only have i noticed better throttle response and smoother idle, im 4 tanks in and with unchanged driving habits my combined mileage has increased from 22.6 to 24.5mpg. Might be worth a try guys.....

Last edited by joeltender; 06-27-2015 at 11:03 AM.
joeltender is offline  
Old 06-27-2015, 12:16 PM
  #2  
00Max00
Registered User
 
00Max00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
It is in your imagination, dude. Don't you think manufacturers would put it in their cars to get pass CAFE easier?
00Max00 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
telcoman (06-30-2015)
Old 06-27-2015, 12:40 PM
  #3  
joeltender
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
joeltender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Physics suggests otherwise. Modern fuels have had lubrication removed more and more to adhere to government environment regulations.
Doing 60/40 hwy city, occaisional redline pulls and 75ish with the ac on hwy and getting over 450 miles per tank out of a 6mt is proof for me.

Numerous hwy trips in my old maxima with 220000 miles+ on the odo using this i got 530+ out of a 18 gallon tank
joeltender is offline  
Old 06-27-2015, 09:15 PM
  #4  
Black Betty
Lexus Defector
iTrader: (60)
 
Black Betty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 21,148
Received 2,087 Likes on 1,267 Posts
Congratulations.
Black Betty is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Black Betty:
Detail (06-30-2015), twin_snails (07-03-2015)
Old 06-28-2015, 12:59 AM
  #5  
joeltender
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
joeltender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just thought id share my experience,
Using in quantities im saving 8$+ per tank. Also the preventative maintenance of it all makes it a good idea, especally for possible long term ownership
joeltender is offline  
Old 06-30-2015, 03:11 AM
  #6  
telcoman
Registered Member
 
telcoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,638
Received 161 Likes on 139 Posts
Originally Posted by joeltender
I tried the lucas in my old 6mt maxima and had great results. I assumed the great mileage results were from the timing advance, gab mod etc.
Now ive started adding it to my 6mt g sedan and wow!
Not only have i noticed better throttle response and smoother idle, im 4 tanks in and with unchanged driving habits my combined mileage has increased from 22.6 to 24.5mpg. Might be worth a try guys.....
Never used it and any additives are a waste of money in my opinion

Name:  2013-08-10MyPictures081013007_zps02a600c6.jpg
Views: 236
Size:  30.6 KB

I use regular instead and it works great.

Telcoman
telcoman is offline  
Old 06-30-2015, 12:21 PM
  #7  
blazeplacid
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
blazeplacid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 669
Received 39 Likes on 38 Posts
I worked in an Auto parts store a for three years while in college.

I've sold and used almost all of the major additives.
Almost all of them are junk.

We did sell a ton of it when gas was $4 a gallon though....
blazeplacid is offline  
The following users liked this post:
telcoman (06-30-2015)
Old 06-30-2015, 01:00 PM
  #8  
joeltender
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
joeltender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Searching "upper cylinder lubricant" and seeing some of the physical preventative maintenance benefits helps.
That was combined mileage, filled up sunday, did approx 100mi strictly hwy and my cpu read 30.9 mpg. While doing 75 mph. Now after the work stop n go commute im still getting 26.7
joeltender is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 01:54 AM
  #9  
twin_snails
Premier Member

iTrader: (2)
 
twin_snails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,067
Received 174 Likes on 114 Posts
Originally Posted by telcoman
Never used it and any additives are a waste of money in my opinion



I use regular instead and it works great.

Telcoman
Did you reset and roll a few miles on highway only to get that 29.1? I don't think it's possible to see 29+ in mixed driving in these cars. I'd do the 87, but with the heat, I don't care for all the timing that gets pulled by the ECU.
twin_snails is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 11:38 AM
  #10  
00Max00
Registered User
 
00Max00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
What 87, you mean regular gas? This is a performance engine designed for 93. It even prints clearly in the manual. Why would you handicap this engine for just saving a few dollars? I have hard time to understand the logic from some people here.
00Max00 is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 12:05 PM
  #11  
WillCo1
Registered Member
 
WillCo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 711
Received 68 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by blazep[B
[/B]lacid;3924602]I worked in an Auto parts store a for three years while in college.

I've sold and used almost all of the major additives.
Almost all of them are junk.

We did sell a ton of it when gas was $4 a gallon though....
You say almost all of them are junk...

Anything actually worth a damn?
WillCo1 is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 08:15 PM
  #12  
twin_snails
Premier Member

iTrader: (2)
 
twin_snails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,067
Received 174 Likes on 114 Posts
Originally Posted by 00Max00
What 87, you mean regular gas? This is a performance engine designed for 93. It even prints clearly in the manual. Why would you handicap this engine for just saving a few dollars? I have hard time to understand the logic from some people here.
Ha, yes...but I've never run 87 because the owners manual calls for premium so it's been on a steady diet of 93 octane for the last 5 years. 87 would knock in the Texas heat with 11.0:1 compression and the ECU would retard the timing a lot.
twin_snails is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 08:56 PM
  #13  
Redfire32
Ginger ninja

iTrader: (12)
 
Redfire32's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 1,998
Received 257 Likes on 229 Posts
I use the 93 gas nearly EVERYTIME I fill up. Only reason I ever use the mid-grade is if I happen to stop at a station that has ridiculously high prices for the 93 vs other stations in my town.

Manual calls for 93....I love my car....so I run the 93.
Redfire32 is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 05:03 AM
  #14  
telcoman
Registered Member
 
telcoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,638
Received 161 Likes on 139 Posts
Originally Posted by 00Max00
What 87, you mean regular gas? This is a performance engine designed for 93. It even prints clearly in the manual. Why would you handicap this engine for just saving a few dollars? I have hard time to understand the logic from some people here.
Do you believe everything you read?
If you advertise a vehicle engine has a certain HP then in order to confirm that statement then you may have to use a higher octane gasoline.
Do I care how much HP my engine has?
NO! I don't give a fvck. It gets me to work and on long road trips just fine
Both my current and previous Infiniti's have been great cars. Best I've ever owned.

Yes regular 97 octane! Been using it in every vehicle I've ever owned and never had a problem with it. Unless you are engaging in competition racing spending extra money on premium gasoline is a waste of money IMHO.
It is not a few dollars but thousands over time.

My 06 G35 at trade in time. Never a problem using 87 octane

Name:  GoodbyG35083112028.jpg
Views: 208
Size:  49.0 KB

Never a problem using regular 87 in my current 2012 G37S

Name:  Milestone%206%20G37S%20061915%20022_zpsicdxuqer.jpg
Views: 263
Size:  43.4 KB

I reset the vehicle computer every fill up

Name:  2014-122914MyPictures122914-036_zps6e738050.jpg
Views: 257
Size:  56.5 KB

Four fill ups from NJ to Florida on the way down and four fill ups on the return. The lower MPG on two fill ups in Florida was short trips in Florida mostly by the wife. It runs fine on regular both in Florida heat and New Jersey cold.

Another round trip to Florida from NJ all on 87 Octane

Name:  MPG016_zps4b503d5a.jpg
Views: 204
Size:  41.4 KB


Name:  2013-09--26MyPictures092613008_zpsec2f41cc.jpg
Views: 274
Size:  40.5 KB

In driving over 230k miles on both of my Infiniti's all on 87 octane except for a one month test of 91 and a one month test of 93 on my previous 06 G35 I have not had any problems using regular 87 octane.

I purchase almost all of my local gas here.

Name:  2014-122914MyPictures122914-035_zps84cef712.jpg
Views: 251
Size:  54.6 KB

Telcoman
telcoman is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 11:23 AM
  #15  
qmantran
Registered Member
 
qmantran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,138
Received 181 Likes on 141 Posts
Wow you're pretty lame for bragging about using 87 octane.

You're so proud of it that you even put it in your signature like it's a mod. Dated and priced. What a loser
qmantran is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by qmantran:
DevilsG37s (05-10-2016), Redfire32 (07-04-2015)


Quick Reply: It seems like upper cylinder lubricant works!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM.