G37 Sedan

Sedan Chat Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2017, 03:28 PM
  #11881  
MaQG37
Registered Member
iTrader: (4)
 
MaQG37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 992
Received 208 Likes on 166 Posts
I couldn't get any 93 this week due to the stupid gas shortage here locally. I will be running 87 this week and will be driving the car carefully. I thought about Octane booster but I'm not fully comfortable pushing the car untuned with FBO on 87 gas + octane booster.
Old 09-05-2017, 03:34 PM
  #11882  
future62
Registered User
 
future62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 559
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Rochester
Most CVT's suck, no argument from me. The only exception I've ever found is the CVT that Nissan was using in their Maxima since 2009. That is, until now. For some reason, the CVT connected to the 2.5 NA Boxer in the Forester is a perfect match. They've programmed it to really feel like you're driving a traditional 6AT. It's quite brilliant, combining fuel efficiency with a normal driving experience from a CVT. That said, I don't expect to ever use the flappy paddles. Kind of weird they're even there.
I knew I wasn't crazy. I had a 2015 rental... I swear, it might be one of the best autos I've ever used. On par with the ZF8 and worlds better than the Jatco 7AT. I almost considered buying one over the G but the chassis and looks put me off.

Transmissions really make or break a car. I almost bought a last gen Genesis sedan over the G but the transmission killed it for me. Shame too as that is a much more luxurious car. I really liked it.
Old 09-05-2017, 03:42 PM
  #11883  
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,862
Received 4,571 Likes on 3,422 Posts
The CVT in the new Honda CR-V was horrible, loud and slow. And the CVT in the Nissan Rogue was like nails on a chalkboard, it was truly that bad.

Here's a fascinating surprise: the transmission in the Hyundai Tuscon is a 7AT with a dual-clutch! And it was great! However, the car itself was not. (There's a great reason for a 10/100 drive-train warranty, if ever there was one.)

Oddly enough, the exact same CVT on the Forester XT Turbo was not the same experience as the 2.5 NA. The turbo lag and boost just didn't mesh well with that transmission. 80 less hp than the turbo, but I honestly feel we bought the better driver's car... insofar as you can call a Subaru Forester a "driver's car", LOL.
Old 09-05-2017, 03:49 PM
  #11884  
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,993
Received 505 Likes on 435 Posts
Originally Posted by 2GoRNot2G
We're currently looking for a new "dog hauler" for my wife and have also been looking at the Forester, along with the VW Atlas, Mazda CX9 and Dodge Durango RT. I think the CVT tranny killed the Forester for her and right now the Durango RT is at the top of her list.
Since those are all 7 passenger SUVs, might I suggest checking out the Ford Explorer? The 3.5 ecoboost V6 is a beast.

We recently traded ours in since my wife went from consulting/working from home back to an office job and we were going to end up 20,000 miles over her lease allocation.

She refused to even consider a car with a CVT, which unfortunately eliminated Nissan and Subaru. I would have liked to test drive a Forester XT. We ended up getting a 2017 Accord with the V6/6AT, which we're both happy with. I dunno why, but I prefer a naturally aspirated engine over a turbo for long term reliability
Old 09-05-2017, 04:06 PM
  #11885  
future62
Registered User
 
future62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 559
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts
I'm surprised the Forester XT was no good. In my experience though, CVTs, like everything automotive, get better with more horsepower. I drove a Fit CVT and an Accord CVT.... Maxima > Accord > Fit, entirely down to the power available. The Accord was surprisingly punchy for a 4 banger but I just hated how it looked. So needlessly huge.
Old 09-05-2017, 09:01 PM
  #11886  
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,862
Received 4,571 Likes on 3,422 Posts
Originally Posted by future62
I'm surprised the Forester XT was no good.
Well, it's a subjective opinion, so yours might be different. It just felt mismatched to the car, and mushy. And as for practicality, it only averages 23 mpg, while requiring 93 octane , all for approximately $4000 over the lesser engine... so there were contributing forces at work here.
Old 09-05-2017, 09:42 PM
  #11887  
xpcgamer
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
xpcgamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Florida.
Posts: 403
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Not gonna lie...this Hurricane is starting to worry me. Last big one I went threw was Andrew. It hit us down south but I remember looking for my buddies Aunt in a debry field. !st floor shutters are in and will do the 2nd floor later this week. **** gonna get real by Saturday. Hopefully something happens and it weakens a ton
Old 09-06-2017, 01:06 PM
  #11888  
2GoRNot2G
Premier Member

iTrader: (5)
 
2GoRNot2G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,360
Received 399 Likes on 330 Posts
Originally Posted by Lego_Maniac
Since those are all 7 passenger SUVs, might I suggest checking out the Ford Explorer? The 3.5 ecoboost V6 is a beast.

We recently traded ours in since my wife went from consulting/working from home back to an office job and we were going to end up 20,000 miles over her lease allocation.

She refused to even consider a car with a CVT, which unfortunately eliminated Nissan and Subaru. I would have liked to test drive a Forester XT. We ended up getting a 2017 Accord with the V6/6AT, which we're both happy with. I dunno why, but I prefer a naturally aspirated engine over a turbo for long term reliability

We're not specifically looking for a 3-row SUV, but we need room for 3 big dogs so with the 3rd row seats folded down there tends to be more cargo room in the 3-row vehicles. We've already looked at the Explorer sport and we both really liked it... especially the exterior styling which looks far nicer than just about anything else in its class. Unfortunately by the time you add all of the options my wife is looking for the Explorer is well above our budget.


I think the CX-9 is also out now since my wife tried to fit our biggest dog in it and she's too tall to even sit up in the back. That sloping roof-line may look good from the exterior but at the compromise of head room and cargo space.



So we've pretty much narrowed it down to the Dodge Durango RT. It just drives nicer and, funny enough, handles better than anything else we have driven. Plus it comes pretty well loaded up with options for $42K sticker and can be had for around $37K with dealer discounts. I'm still trying to talk her into a Grand Cherokee Trailhawk instead, which can be had with the same 5.7L Hemi V8 as the Durango RT, but looks WAY better than the Durango IMO... She's just concerned that there won't be enough space in the back for the dogs in the Grand Cherokee.
Old 09-06-2017, 01:20 PM
  #11889  
2GoRNot2G
Premier Member

iTrader: (5)
 
2GoRNot2G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,360
Received 399 Likes on 330 Posts
Originally Posted by xpcgamer
Not gonna lie...this Hurricane is starting to worry me. Last big one I went threw was Andrew. It hit us down south but I remember looking for my buddies Aunt in a debry field. !st floor shutters are in and will do the 2nd floor later this week. **** gonna get real by Saturday. Hopefully something happens and it weakens a ton

I have family down in the Lake Worth area and it's not looking good for anyone located in South Florida right now. Like you said, hopefully it looses some of its steam before it hits, but at least you have a little time to prepare. Good luck and stay safe.
Old 09-07-2017, 11:10 PM
  #11890  
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,862
Received 4,571 Likes on 3,422 Posts
We took delivery of my wife's new car tonight. I knew going into this that the Touring Edition was loaded with all kinds of high-end technology, and lane-detection warning was part of that. Imagine my surprise realizing that it just doesn't warn you when you drift off-center, it actually nudges your steering wheel back on track.



Holy crap.
Old 09-08-2017, 06:08 AM
  #11891  
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,993
Received 505 Likes on 435 Posts
Originally Posted by Rochester
We took delivery of my wife's new car tonight. I knew going into this that the Touring Edition was loaded with all kinds of high-end technology, and lane-detection warning was part of that. Imagine my surprise realizing that it just doesn't warn you when you drift off-center, it actually nudges your steering wheel back on track.



Holy crap.
Just wait until the collision avoidance kicks in and brakes for you
Old 09-08-2017, 02:26 PM
  #11892  
2GoRNot2G
Premier Member

iTrader: (5)
 
2GoRNot2G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,360
Received 399 Likes on 330 Posts
Originally Posted by Rochester
We took delivery of my wife's new car tonight. I knew going into this that the Touring Edition was loaded with all kinds of high-end technology, and lane-detection warning was part of that. Imagine my surprise realizing that it just doesn't warn you when you drift off-center, it actually nudges your steering wheel back on track.



Holy crap.
Eek. That's scary! Hopefully that's something you can disable. My wife won't even buy a car with start/stop (that can't be disable) let alone one that tries to drive the car for you.
Old 09-08-2017, 02:47 PM
  #11893  
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,862
Received 4,571 Likes on 3,422 Posts
Originally Posted by 2GoRNot2G
Eek. That's scary! Hopefully that's something you can disable. My wife won't even buy a car with start/stop (that can't be disable) let alone one that tries to drive the car for you.
It can be shut off, but it's on by default, so you have to shut it off every time you use the car. At least, I think that's the way it is, but I really need to read the manual. Most safety stuff is like that... on by default, just like Traction Control.

Start/Stop isn't about safety, it's fuel consumption. And yeah I agree, start/stop sucks. I hate it.

Last night we were watching how the headlights swivel with the steering wheel in the direction we're turning. That was kind of freaky. Even more so if you pull up to something reflective and turn the car on while the headlights are on auto... they actually swivel outside, inside and back to center for some crazy "start-up" process. Hahahaha, wow.

Last edited by Rochester; 09-08-2017 at 03:00 PM.
Old 09-08-2017, 05:27 PM
  #11894  
future62
Registered User
 
future62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 559
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts
My wife's '11 MKX has steering headlights. I'm jealous.... I need them more than she does!
Old 09-08-2017, 09:41 PM
  #11895  
slartibartfast
Super Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
slartibartfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 6,086
Received 836 Likes on 715 Posts
Turn off DSC. You can point the headlights anywhere you want.


Quick Reply: Sedan Chat Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 AM.