![]() |
It's been real G37 fam
4 Attachment(s)
I want to give a big shout out to all the people that's helped me out for the past 8 years I had my G37 coupe. A lot of troubleshooting and feedback from folks here was truly appreciated.
Bought the G brand new Oct 07 and sold Mar 16. Learned a lot here and met some cool people. Now onto the next. 11 E92 M3 6MT w/ 19k on the clock Attachment 134281 Old baby LOL Attachment 134282 Attachment 134283 Attachment 134284 |
Ah very nice trade up, enjoy it man.
|
Damn Slate.....be sure to check on us lower class people from time to time! lmao, gorgeous step up bro!
|
Originally Posted by Topher9425
(Post 4019745)
Damn Slate.....be sure to check on us lower class people from time to time! lmao, gorgeous step up bro!
Hoping to get a R33 in 2019 |
Nice upgrade. What are your thoughts on the car as it compares to the G?
|
Congrats OP, I sold mine and bought a G simply due to the engine fears associated with the S65 engine. They have connecting rod bearing clearance issues and it caused the engines to crap out. Probably rare but thats all they talked about on the M3 forum...the engine cost 20 to 25k to replace so get a blackstone report and keep your eye on it!
Love that high revving engine its intoxicating right!!?? |
Originally Posted by 04gtoryder
(Post 4019780)
Nice upgrade. What are your thoughts on the car as it compares to the G?
Cons - Thirsty *** girl (avg 13MPG 80% city) - noisy engine - maintenance is double (even though I do my own work) - No touch screen interface (iDrive blows) - Can't set stupid things like vanity lights, setting without coding the car Pros - Blast to drive V8 roars - Builds power all the way up to redline unlike the linear power on G's - Minimal body roll compared to the G (hugs the road) - Clutch system 100 times better - Responsiveness is also night and day - Easy to drive unlike the G which is very jerky - Much more spacious than my G coupe - Suspension and brake very responsive |
Originally Posted by G37sGraphite
(Post 4019784)
Congrats OP, I sold mine and bought a G simply due to the engine fears associated with the S65 engine. They have connecting rod bearing clearance issues and it caused the engines to crap out. Probably rare but thats all they talked about on the M3 forum...the engine cost 20 to 25k to replace so get a blackstone report and keep your eye on it!
Love that high revving engine its intoxicating right!!?? I thought the VQ was a blast until I met this V8 monster. Thing screams and puts a grin every time I WOT |
Nah they all had the problem just the 08s are older so more were feeling the effects of the clearance issues. BMW never did anything about it -there is a million page thread on the forum...Dont read it all or you will sell your car...lol
|
Originally Posted by G37sGraphite
(Post 4019793)
Nah they all had the problem just the 08s are older so more were feeling the effects of the clearance issues. BMW never did anything about it -there is a million page thread on the forum...Dont read it all or you will sell your car...lol
On the other hand my G from 0-135K miles never gave me any issues besides 1 o2 sensor, clutch master cylinder and thermostat being replaced. All makes have different issues. G had the notorious bad clutch system where the CSC fails like hot cakes. I replaced my master 2 times |
Originally Posted by SlateBlue G
(Post 4019791)
I see mostly 08's having the bearing issue. Planning on sending oil to blackstone on my next oil change at 25k
I thought the VQ was a blast until I met this V8 monster. Thing screams and puts a grin every time I WOT I was contemplating this car for a year and the engine issues were just rampant and it was so disappointing because if it wasn't for that, this would be THE perfect M3 IMO. I chose a Nismo 370z instead. Go on the forums and plenty of the newer years such as 2011 and 2012 cars have blown engines with low mileage too. Totally unacceptable on BMW's part. I hope you have a good one though and it doesn't give you any engine issues. Congrats! |
Originally Posted by redlinernyc
(Post 4019803)
Actually, all the years are prone to engine failure (08-13). I believe in 2010 BMW changed the material of the rings but the problem still exists. Because of the material used in the 08-09 years, it's easier to find in an oil analysis compared to 2010+. This is what I've read on the forums.
I was contemplating this car for a year and the engine issues were just rampant and it was so disappointing because if it wasn't for that, this would be THE perfect M3 IMO. I chose a Nismo 370z instead. Go on the forums and plenty of the newer years such as 2011 and 2012 cars have blown engines with low mileage too. Totally unacceptable on BMW's part. I hope you have a good one though and it doesn't give you any engine issues. Congrats! |
Congrats and happy trails. :thewave:
|
Originally Posted by Black Betty
(Post 4019806)
Congrats and happy trails. :thewave:
|
Originally Posted by SlateBlue G
(Post 4019805)
Thanks bro. Same reason I didn't go with the STI. Didn't want to worry about ringland issues. Was considering a 370z nismo but that would have been my 4th Nissan.
You do know there is a sure way to prevent the rod bearing issues from happening, right? It's a $2k fix but well worth it IMO if you plan on keeping the car. People on the m3 forums have been changing out the rod bearings as preventative maintenance and they never have to worry about the problem ever happening. B/c I'm the paranoid type, that's something I would do if I ever got that car. Just wanted to put that idea out there though. If you do get it done though, make sure you get it done from a reputable shop that knows of this issue. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands