Notices
Body Interior Exterior Lighting

Tinted and or smoke taillights and headlights

Old 02-28-2012, 03:52 PM
  #16  
esquesk
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
esquesk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mtrsprt
First of all, let me try to read what you wrote..... OK done.

Second of all.... Yours actually aren't too bad. I have seen much darker, and that's what I was referring more to.
Can you point me to one that is done rice-y?

Maybe it's me, but I typically associate rice with rattlecan mufflers, huge wing spoilers, underglow, and badly done lambo doors.

I'm having a hard time seeing how tinting out one's tail-lights would be considered rice. But hey, if you can show me one that proves me wrong, the more power to you.


Originally Posted by mtrsprt
Doing the ricer thing to these med/high end cars kills the value and makes them look ricey. IMHO.
Not sure how tint/overlays that can be easily removed kills the value of a car
Old 02-28-2012, 03:55 PM
  #17  
Chekov
Senior Citizen

 
Chekov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,984
Received 87 Likes on 66 Posts
As touched on in this and past threads, if there is a 1,000 feet rule in Texas (and I think there is) one should consider what that means. Let’s say the average car length is 13.5 feet. Allowing for a few feet between cars, that means tail lights would have to be still visible the equivalent of 64 car lengths ahead during the day. That would be a tall order for most smoked tail lights. So not only is safety a factor here, but I would expect any insurance company to deny a rear-end collision claim made by anyone with this mod.
Old 02-28-2012, 03:55 PM
  #18  
mtrsprt
Registered User
 
mtrsprt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Concord,NH
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by esquesk
Can you point me to one that is done rice-y?
Name:  DSC02314.jpg
Views: 5052
Size:  70.9 KB

To me, this looks TERRIBLE..........
Old 02-28-2012, 03:56 PM
  #19  
esquesk
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
esquesk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chekov
As touched on in this and past threads, if there is a 1,000 feet rule in Texas (and I think there is) one should consider what that means. Let’s say the average car length is 13.5 feet. Allowing for a few feet between cars, that means tail lights would have to be still visible the equivalent of 64 car lengths ahead during the day. That would be a tall order for most smoked tail lights. So not only is safety a factor here, but I would expect any insurance company to deny a rear-end collision claim made by anyone with this mod.
Only at night
Old 02-28-2012, 05:05 PM
  #20  
37hevn
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
37hevn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
i dont think the above g35 looks ricey. looks clean smooth and sleek like i said before. its not solid black
Old 02-28-2012, 05:07 PM
  #21  
mtrsprt
Registered User
 
mtrsprt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Concord,NH
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 37hevn
i dont think the above g35 looks ricey. looks clean smooth and sleek like i said before. its not solid black
Let me know how it looks when your 35 or older.
Old 02-28-2012, 05:33 PM
  #22  
37hevn
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
37hevn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
if youre 35 or older then anything can easily upset you and im not surprised. now that i know that i can let this go. thanks
Old 02-28-2012, 07:25 PM
  #23  
tejasg37x
Registered User
 
tejasg37x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Burleson, Tx
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 37hevn
if youre 35 or older then anything can easily upset you and im not surprised. now that i know that i can let this go. thanks
What he meant to say was: if you're 35 or older you make more reasonable decisions with your car and keep it classy.

If anyone calls being concerned with safety being easily upset, then they must belong in the group that thinks whatever I do to my car looks cool even if I ignore safety...

Plenty of times I've been behind cars with tinted tail lights that you could barely see when they brake in front of you...it's not cool.

Last edited by tejasg37x; 02-28-2012 at 07:32 PM.
Old 02-29-2012, 10:32 AM
  #24  
clownshoes
Registered User
 
clownshoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DashKid
I live at Dallas and yes it is illegal to have it period. Just like having no front plates are illegal in tx. Front plates and tinted lights are just couple reasons why the cop can pull you over.
Speaking of front plates in TX, whats the fine for a missing front plate? Is it different in SA vesus Dallas?

I was thinking of getting those balck and white custom TX plates if its the same price as a ticket.
Old 02-29-2012, 11:20 AM
  #25  
DashKid
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
DashKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas, TX (Las Colinas)
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by clownshoes
Speaking of front plates in TX, whats the fine for a missing front plate? Is it different in SA vesus Dallas?

I was thinking of getting those balck and white custom TX plates if its the same price as a ticket.
yeah well I don't have front plates but got pulled over by a state trooper on the way to Austin. Got pulled over at waco and the fine was $75 dollars. It was fix it or ticket thing. I just paid the fine because it doesn't go on my record.


It is correct sir. The fine are different by cities some cities charged a **** load for no front plate.
Old 02-29-2012, 11:39 AM
  #26  
esquesk
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
esquesk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think the G35 looks that bad either.

Safety is a whole different issue. This is just FYI for those of us who are in Cali - the general rule of thumb is 1,000 ft.

V C Section 24600 Taillamps

However, I have heard of people being cited under a different code.

Last edited by esquesk; 02-29-2012 at 12:02 PM.
Old 02-29-2012, 12:01 PM
  #27  
Chekov
Senior Citizen

 
Chekov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,984
Received 87 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by esquesk
I don't think the G35 looks that bad either.

Safety is a whole different issue. This is just FYI for those of us who are in Cali - the general rule of thumb is 500 ft.

V C Section 24600 Taillamps

However, I have heard of people being cited under a different code.
I believe your referenced link says that tail lights for vehicles manufactured after January 1, 1969 shall be plainly visible from all distances within 1,000 feet to the rear. Of course, that would cover all Infinitis.
Old 02-29-2012, 12:03 PM
  #28  
esquesk
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
esquesk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chekov
I believe your referenced link says that tail lights for vehicles manufactured after January 1, 1969 shall be plainly visible from all distances within 1,000 feet to the rear. Of course, that would cover all Infinitis.
Thanks Corrected.
Old 03-01-2012, 06:47 PM
  #29  
tejasg37x
Registered User
 
tejasg37x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Burleson, Tx
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Chekov
As touched on in this and past threads, if there is a 1,000 feet rule in Texas (and I think there is) one should consider what that means. Let’s say the average car length is 13.5 feet. Allowing for a few feet between cars, that means tail lights would have to be still visible the equivalent of 64 car lengths ahead during the day. That would be a tall order for most smoked tail lights. So not only is safety a factor here, but I would expect any insurance company to deny a rear-end collision claim made by anyone with this mod.
You are correct, the law is 1,000 feet in Texas...

TEX TN. CODE ANN. § 547.322 : Texas Statutes - Section 547.322: TAILLAMPS REQUIRED
Old 08-09-2018, 09:31 AM
  #30  
douby77
Registered User
 
douby77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 42
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 37hevn
due to lack of upload space i can only show you what mine looks like now
What percent is that. It looks gorgeous

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tinted and or smoke taillights and headlights



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.